Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Botanica Marina

Editor-in-Chief: Dring, Matthew J.

6 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 1.239
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.373

CiteScore 2016: 1.28

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.456
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.841

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 44, Issue 1 (Jan 2001)


A Comparative Study of the Harmful Dinoflagellates Cochlodinium polykrikoides and Gyrodinium impudicum Using Transmission Electron Microscopy, Fatty Acid Composition, Carotenoid Content, DNA Quantification and Gene Sequences

E. S. Cho / G. Y. Kim / B. D. Choi / L. L. Rhodes / T. J. Kim / G. H. Kim / J. D. Lee
Published Online: 2005-06-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/BOT.2001.008


The massive growth of the dinoflagellate alga Cochlodinium polykrikoides in Korean coastal waters was first observed in 1982. Thereafter the blooms associated with massive fish kills have been occurring annually, and C. polykrikoides is now regarded a harmful red tide organism in Korea. Recently, a new chain-forming Gyrodinium impudicum, usually occurring with Cochlodinium polykrikoides, was observed. Thus, we need to identify the toxic C. polykrikoides from the non-toxic Gyrodinium impudicum. Because of a similarity in morphology, it is difficult to distinguish the two species under the light microscope. In this study, comparisons were made using fine-scale features of transverse sections and biochemical analysis including rDNA sequencing targeted ITS regions. The observation of cellular arrangement and structure by transmission electron microscopy showed a similar distribution of the main components in both species, but location of the nucleus and distribution of the chloroplasts were different. Fatty acid composition showed that the long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid docosahexanoic acid was not present in Cochlodinium polykrikoides. These data suggest that fatty acid composition may be a useful biochemical indicator to distinguish the microalgae. The amount of total carotenoids in Gyrodinium impudicum was approximately 10 times higher than in Cochlodinium polykrikoides. The nuclear DNA content in Cochlodinium polykrikoides was twice as high as that in Gyrodinium impudicum (p < 0.06). Sequence analyses coding for the 5.8S rDNA and ITS regions showed quite different nucleotide alignments with only 55% similarity, the length of the ITS regions also differed. The genetic differences between the two microalgae will allow the development of species specific DNA probes for species differentiation.

About the article

Published Online: 2005-06-01

Published in Print: 2001-01-19

Citation Information: Botanica Marina, ISSN (Print) 0006-8055, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/BOT.2001.008.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Hyun-Gwan Lee, Hye Mi Kim, Juhee Min, Keunyong Kim, Myung Gil Park, Hae Jin Jeong, and Kwang Young Kim
ALGAE, 2017, Volume 32, Number 3, Page 189
José-Luis Giner, Harriette Ceballos, Ying-Zhong Tang, and Christopher J. Gobler
Chemistry & Biodiversity, 2016, Volume 13, Number 2, Page 249
Joung Han Yim, Sung Jin Kim, Se Hoon Ahn, and Hong Kum Lee
Biomolecular Engineering, 2003, Volume 20, Number 4-6, Page 273
Phil F. Culverhouse
Ecological Informatics, 2007, Volume 2, Number 4, Page 361
Yong-Woo Lee and Guebuem Kim
Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2007, Volume 71, Number 1-2, Page 309
Hyeon Ho Shin, Kazumi Matsuoka, Yang Ho Yoon, and Young-Ok Kim
Marine Micropaleontology, 2010, Volume 77, Number 1-2, Page 15
Casey C. Curtiss, Gregg W. Langlois, Lilian B. Busse, Fernanda Mazzillo, and Mary W. Silver
Harmful Algae, 2008, Volume 7, Number 3, Page 337
Patricia M Glibert, Jan H Landsberg, Joyce J Evans, Mohammad A Al-Sarawi, Muna Faraj, Mohammad A Al-Jarallah, Allison Haywood, Shahnaz Ibrahem, Phil Klesius, Christine Powell, and Craig Shoemaker
Harmful Algae, 2002, Volume 1, Number 2, Page 215
C.M. Mikulski, Y.T. Park, K.L. Jones, C.K. Lee, W.A. Lim, Y. Lee, C.A. Scholin, and G.J. Doucette
Harmful Algae, 2008, Volume 7, Number 3, Page 347
Chang-Hoon Kim, Gi-Hong Park, and Keun-Yong Kim
Fisheries and aquatic sciences, 2004, Volume 7, Number 3, Page 122
Juan José Dorantes-Aranda, Luz María García-de la Parra, Rosalba Alonso-Rodríguez, and Lourdes Morquecho
Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2009, Volume 58, Number 9, Page 1401
Eun-Seob Cho and Chang-Su Jeong
Journal of Life Science, 2007, Volume 17, Number 11, Page 1453
F. Gómez
Botanica Marina, 2003, Volume 46, Number 3
Gires Usup, Siti Zaleha Hamid, Pheng Koon Chiet, Cheng Kok Wah, and Asmat Ahmad
Phycologia, 2008, Volume 47, Number 1, Page 105
Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 2010, Volume 57, Number 4, Page 308
Jianjun Hou, Bangqin Huang, Jun Hu, Lizhen Lin, and Huasheng Hong
Journal of Applied Phycology, 2008, Volume 20, Number 1, Page 35
Guebuem Kim, Yong-Woo Lee, Dong-Joo Joung, Kyung-Ryul Kim, and Kuh Kim
Geophysical Research Letters, 2006, Volume 33, Number 13

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in