Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Botanica Marina

Editor-in-Chief: Dring, Matthew J.

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 1.239
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.373

CiteScore 2017: 1.00

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.297
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.454

Online
ISSN
1437-4323
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 45, Issue 4

Issues

Monthly Monitoring of Domoic Acid Producer Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries (Hasle) Hasle Using Species-Specific DNA Probes and WGA Lectins and Abundance of Pseudo-nitzschia Species (Bacillariophyceae) from Chinhae Bay, Korea

E. S. Cho / H. J. Hur / H. S. Byun / S. G. Lee / L. L. Rhodes / C. S. Jeong / J. G. Park
Published Online: 2005-06-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/BOT.2002.037

Abstract

A twelve-month field survey of the genus Pseudo-nitzschia was carried out in Chinhae Bay, an area of commercial culturing and harvesting of oysters. The study used molecular DNA probes and WGA lectins to determine monthly species abundance and relate this to environmental conditions and nutrients. Ten species of Pseudo-nitzschia were identified during the study: Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries, P. pungens, P. multistriata, P. delicatissima, P. cuspidata, P. subfraudulenta, P. granii, P. fraudulenta, P. subpacifica, and an unidentified Pseudo- nitzschia sp. Of the Pseudo-nitzschia species, Pseudo-nitzschia pungens had the highest cell abundance, followed by P. delicatissima and P. multistriata. The presence of Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries was correlated with domoic acid (DA) contamination of shellfish, for example at Stations (Stn) P2, P3 and P4. Where Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries was recorded, trace levels of DA were detected, but at Stn P1 neither Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries nor DA were detected during the period of this study. Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries is regarded as the most toxic of the DA-producing species known in Korea. Korean isolates of Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries were strongly labeled by WGA lectin and the Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries species-specific DNA probe, and were distributed in seawater of lower temperature (≤ 15 °C) and linked with lower nutrient concentrations, although cell numbers were significantly lower than for Pseudo-nitzschia pungens. The use of the probes puD1, deD1 and frD1 led to the recognition of Pseudo-nitzschia pungens, P. delicatissima and P. fraudulenta, respectively. Although Pseudo-nitzschia species varied depending on month and sampling site, most were present at higher cell densities in lower temperature waters except for Pseudo-nitzschia multistriata. It was demonstrated that these methods provide a simple and rapid technique for the identification of a variety of Pseudo-nitzschia in Korean waters, and offer the opportunity for a series of real-time species detection in the future.

About the article

Published Online: 2005-06-01

Published in Print: 2002-07-04


Citation Information: Botanica Marina, Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages 364–372, ISSN (Print) 0006-8055, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/BOT.2002.037.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Justin D. Liefer, Alison Robertson, Hugh L. MacIntyre, William L. Smith, and Carol P. Dorsey
Harmful Algae, 2013, Volume 26, Page 20
[2]
Juan Blanco, Filomena Livramento, and Isabel Menezes Rangel
Toxicon, 2010, Volume 55, Number 2-3, Page 541
[3]
Domenico D’Alelio, Alberto Amato, Alexander Luedeking, and Marina Montresor
Harmful Algae, 2009, Volume 8, Number 2, Page 225
[4]
Irena Kaczmarska, Jennifer L. Martin, James M. Ehrman, and Murielle M. LeGresley
Harmful Algae, 2007, Volume 6, Number 6, Page 861
[5]
Gonzalo Álvarez, Eduardo Uribe, Sonia Quijano-Scheggia, Américo López-Rivera, Carmen Mariño, and Juan Blanco
Harmful Algae, 2009, Volume 8, Number 6, Page 938
[6]
Inna V. Stonik, Tatiana Yu. Orlova, and Nina Lundholm
Diatom Research, 2011, Volume 26, Number 1, Page 121
[7]
Tatiana Yu. Orlova, Inna V. Stonik, Nina A. Aizdaicher, Stephen S. Bates, Claude Léger, and Johanna Fehling
Botanica Marina, 2008, Volume 51, Number 4
[8]
I. V. Stonik, T. Yu. Orlova, and A. A. Begun
Ocean Science Journal, 2008, Volume 43, Number 1, Page 25
[9]
S. Loureiro, C. Jauzein, E. Garces, Y. Collos, J. Camp, and D. Vaque
Journal of Plankton Research, 2009, Volume 31, Number 4, Page 399
[10]
Katherine A. Hubbard, Gabrielle Rocap, and E. Virginia Armbrust
Journal of Phycology, 2008, Volume 44, Number 3, Page 637
[11]
Jianjun Hou, Bangqin Huang, Jun Hu, Lizhen Lin, and Huasheng Hong
Journal of Applied Phycology, 2008, Volume 20, Number 1, Page 35
[12]
M. Martin-Cereceda, R. Williams, A. Guinea, and G. Novarino
Protoplasma, 2007, Volume 232, Number 1-2, Page 69

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in