Editor-in-Chief: Dring, Matthew J.
IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.919
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.336
CiteScore 2018: 1.22
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.399
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.672
Filamentous (e.g., Chaetomorpha spp.) and flattened or tubular (e.g., Ulva spp. and Enteromorpha spp.) green algal morphotypes were collected from the intertidal mudflat within the Yaquina Bay Estuary (Newport, OR, USA) and used to compare an in situ volumetric biomass estimator to the traditional dry weight methodology. Immediately following collection, wet volumes of each sample by morphotype were determined in situ using a modified graduated cylinder and a plunger. Samples were returned to the laboratory, dried to a constant weight, and then weighed. Both biomass estimators were compared using a linear regression technique. We found that dry weight was linearly related to volume (r2 = 0.78 to 0.88) for both morphotypes indicating that volume was an accurate predictor of biomass. We suggest the use of this technique, when appropriate, will enable researchers to quickly estimate macroalgal biomass in situ with savings in both time and expense.
Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.