Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Botanica Marina

Editor-in-Chief: Dring, Matthew

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 1.239
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.373

CiteScore 2016: 1.28

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.608
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.664

Online
ISSN
1437-4323
See all formats and pricing
In This Section
Volume 47, Issue 4 (Jul 2004)

Issues

Annual variation in leaf photosynthesis and leaf nutrient content of four Mediterranean seagrasses

Susana Enríquez
  • Unidad Académica Puerto Morelos, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Apdo. Postal 1152, Cancún 77500, Quintana Roo, Mexico
/ Nuria Marbà
  • Centro de Estudios Avanzados de Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), Camí de Sta. Bárbara s/n, 17300 Blanes (Girona), Spain
/ Just Cebriàn
  • Centro de Estudios Avanzados de Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), Camí de Sta. Bárbara s/n, 17300 Blanes (Girona), Spain
/ Carlos M. Duarte
  • Centro de Estudios Avanzados de Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), Camí de Sta. Bárbara s/n, 17300 Blanes (Girona), Spain
Published Online: 2005-06-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/BOT.2004.035

Abstract

We examine here the annual variation in leaf photosynthesis and nutrient status of four temperate seagrass species: Posidonia oceanica, Cymodocea nodosa, Zostera noltii, and Zostera marina. We also examine the relationship between leaf photosynthesis and seasonal plant growth and productivity. The four seagrass species examined co-occurred in a shallow protected cove on the NE Spanish Mediterranean coast. The results presented give evidence of large annual variation in the leaf physiological status of these four seagrasses, as well as the occurrence of significant differences in the seasonal pattern among species. We found two contrasting seasonal patterns characterized by optimal leaf photosynthesis in summer (represented by C. nodosa), and winter-autumn (represented by P. oceanica and Z. noltii). These contrasting patterns corresponded with a differential plant dependence on climate fluctuations (described by temperature and irradiance) vs. speciesspecific nutrient status (described by leaf nutrient content). As plant nutrient status results from speciesspecific differences in nutrient requirements, nutrient uptake efficiency, and internal nutrient economy, we conclude that the variation among species found in leaf nutrient content derives from species-specific responses to environmental forcing. Consequently, we can infer that an important fraction of the seasonal variability that seagrasses show may be related to species-specific responses. We also found significant differences among species in the coupling between leaf photosynthesis and plant growth and productivity. Both aspects, speciesspecific responses to environmental forcing and speciesspecific coupling between leaf photosynthesis and plant growth may result in differential seasonal patterns of growth and productivity among seagrass species.

Keywords: leaf photosynthetic status; nutrient status; plant growth; seagrasses; seasonality

About the article

Published Online: 2005-06-01

Published in Print: 2004-07-01



Citation Information: Botanica Marina, ISSN (Online) 1437-4323, ISSN (Print) 0006-8055, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/BOT.2004.035. Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Giancarlo Fascella, Enzo Montoneri, Marco Ginepro, and Matteo Francavilla
Scientia Horticulturae, 2015, Volume 197, Page 90
[3]
Lázaro Marín-Guirao, Jaime Bernardeau-Esteller, Juan Manuel Ruiz, and José Miguel Sandoval-Gil
Biological Invasions, 2015, Volume 17, Number 7, Page 1989
[4]
Nadine Schubert, María Florencia Colombo-Pallota, and Susana Enríquez
Limnology and Oceanography, 2015, Volume 60, Number 1, Page 286
[5]
J Clavier, L Chauvaud, E Amice, P Lazure, M van der Geest, P Labrosse, A Diagne, A Carlier, and S Chauvaud
Marine Ecology Progress Series, 2014, Volume 501, Page 11
[6]
O. Mascaró, J. Romero, and M. Pérez
Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2014, Volume 142, Page 23
[7]
L. Marín-Guirao, J.M. Ruiz, J.M. Sandoval-Gil, J. Bernardeau-Esteller, C.M. Stinco, and A. Meléndez-Martínez
Aquatic Botany, 2013, Volume 109, Page 14
[8]
Orazio Sortino, Mauro Dipasquale, Enzo Montoneri, Lorenzo Tomasso, Paola Avetta, and Alessandra Bianco Prevot
Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2013, Volume 33, Number 2, Page 433
[9]
I. Olivé, J. J. Vergara, and J. L. Pérez-Lloréns
Marine Biology, 2013, Volume 160, Number 2, Page 285
[10]
Marta García-Sánchez, Nathalie Korbee, Isabel Ma Pérez-Ruzafa, Concepción Marcos, Belén Domínguez, Félix L. Figueroa, and Ángel Pérez-Ruzafa
Marine Environmental Research, 2012, Volume 79, Page 37
[11]
Jennifer Hauxwell, Just Cebrian, and Ivan Valiela
Aquatic Botany, 2006, Volume 84, Number 1, Page 17
[12]
Jan E. Vermaat
Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2009, Volume 11, Number 2, Page 137
[13]
Marco Antonio May-Kú, Pedro-Luis Ardisson, and Uriel Ordóñez-López
Botanica Marina, 2010, Volume 53, Number 5
[15]
Susana Enríquez and Norma I. Pantoja-Reyes
Oecologia, 2005, Volume 145, Number 2, Page 234
[16]
Valerio Zupo, Maria Cristina Buia, Maria Cristina Gambi, Maurizio Lorenti, and Gabriele Procaccini
Marine Ecology, 2006, Volume 27, Number 4, Page 328

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in