Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Botanica Marina

Editor-in-Chief: Dring, Matthew J.

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.989
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.204

CiteScore 2017: 1.00

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.297
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.454

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 57, Issue 3


Amalthea and Galene, two new genera of Halymeniaceae (Rhodophyta) from New Zealand

Roberta D’Archino
  • Corresponding author
  • National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd, Private Bag 14-901, Wellington 6241, New Zealand
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Wendy A. Nelson
  • National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd, Private Bag 14-901, Wellington 6241, New Zealand
  • School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92-019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Giuseppe C. Zuccarello
  • School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2014-05-15 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bot-2014-0008


New Zealand foliose red algae belonging to the family Halymeniaceae were examined with a focus on species that have been placed in the genera Halymenia and Cryptonemia. Phylogenetic analyses of plastid-encoded rbcL and morphological observations were undertaken. Samples from northern New Zealand, referred to as Halymenia latifolia, were compared genetically with H. latifolia from its type locality in France. The New Zealand material was clearly separate from the genus Halymenia and from H. latifolia, and was found to be closely related to Halymenia abyssicola from Mexico. The new genus Amalthea is described to accommodate the New Zealand taxon. Samples referred to Cryptonemia sp. from New Zealand formed a well-supported clade with Cryptonemia rotunda from Korea and Japan. This clade was distinct from the clade containing the generitype Cryptonemia lomation from France and other species of Cryptonemia. We propose a new genus Galene to include three species from New Zealand, two of which are described as new here and transfer Cryptonemia rotunda to this new genus.

Keywords: Amalthea gen. nov.; Cryptonemia; Galene gen. nov.; Halymenia; rbcL; taxonomy


  • Abbott, I.A. 1998. Some new species and new combinations of marine red algae from the Central Pacific. Phycol. Res. 46: 97–109.Google Scholar

  • Acleto, C.O. 1973. Las algas marinas del Perú. Bol. Soc Peruana Bot. 6: 1–164.Google Scholar

  • Adams, N.M. 1994. Seaweeds of New Zealand. Christchurch, Canterbury University Press. pp. 360.Google Scholar

  • Agardh, J.G. 1876. Species Genera et Ordines Algarum, Vol. 3. Part 1. Epicrisis systematis Florideanum. Weigel, Leipzig. pp. 724.Google Scholar

  • Balakrishnan, M.S. 1961. Studies on Indian Cryptonemiales III. Halymenia C. A. Ag. J. Madras Univ., Section B 31: 183–217.Google Scholar

  • Calderon, M.S., G.H. Boo and S.M. Boo. 2014. Morphology and phylogeny of Ramirezia osornoensis gen. & sp. nov. and Phyllymenia acletoi sp. nov. (Halymeniales, Rhodophyta) from South America. Phycologia 53: 23–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chiang, Y.M. 1970. Morphological studies of red algae of the family Cryptonemiaceae. University of California Press Vol. 58, California. pp. 95.Google Scholar

  • D’Archino, R., W.A. Nelson and G.C. Zuccarello. 2010. Psaromenia (Kallymeniaceae, Rhodophyta): a new genus for Kallymenia berggrenii. Phycologia 49: 73–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • D’Archino, R., W.A. Nelson and G.C. Zuccarello. 2011. Diversity and complexity in New Zealand Kallymeniaceae (Rhodophyta): recognition of the genus Ectophora and description of E. marginata sp. nov. Phycologia 50: 241–255.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • D’Archino, R., W.A. Nelson and G.C. Zuccarello. 2012. Stauromenia australis, a new genus and species in the family Kallymeniaceae (Rhodophyta) from southern New Zealand. Phycologia 51: 451–460.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gargiulo, G.M., F. De Masi and G. Tripodi. 1986. Structure and reproduction of Halymenia asimetrica sp. nov. (Rhodophyta) from the Mediterranean Sea. Phycologia 25: 144–151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gargiulo, G.M., M. Morabito and A. Manghisi. 2013. A re-assessment of reproductive anatomy and postfertilization development in the systematics of Grateloupia Halymeniales, Rhodophyta). Cryptogamie Algol. 34: 3–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Guimarães, S.M.P.B and M.T. Fujii. 1998. Two species of foliose Halymenia (Halymeniaceae, Rhodophyta) from Brazil. Bot. Mar. 41: 495–504.Google Scholar

  • Guiry, M.D. and G.M. Guiry. 2014. AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication. National University of Ireland, Galway. Available at: http://www.algaebase.org. Accessed on January 14, 2014.

  • Guiry, M.D. and L.M. Irvine. 1974. A species of Cryptonemia new to Europe. Br. Phycol. J. 9: 225–237.Google Scholar

  • Guindon, S. and O. Gascuel. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52: 696–704.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hernández-Kantun, J.J., A.R. Sherwood, R. Riosmena-Rodriguez, J.M. Huisman and O. De Clerck. 2012. Branched Halymenia species (Halymeniaceae, Rhodophyta) in the Indo-Pacific region, including descriptions of Halymenia hawaiiana sp. nov. and H. tondoana sp. nov. Eur. J. Phycol. 47: 421–432.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huisman, J.M., O. De Clerck, W.F. Prud’homme Van Reine and M.A. Borowitzka. 2011. Spongophloea, a new genus of red algae based on Thamnoclonium sect. Nematophorae Weber-vn Bosse (Halymeniales). Eur. J. Phycol. 46: 1–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hommersand, M.H. and S. Fredericq. 1997. Characterization of Myriogramme livida, Myriogrammeae trib. nov. (Delesseriaceae, Rhodophyta). J. Phycol. 33: 106–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hommersand, M.H., G.L. Leister, M.E. Ramírez, P.W. Gabrielson and W.A. Nelson. 2010. A morphological and phylogenetic study of Glaphyrosiphon gen. nov. (Halymeniaceae, Rhodophyta) based on Grateloupia intestinalis with descriptions of two new species: Glaphyrosiphon lindaueri from New Zealand and Glaphyrosiphon chilensis from Chile. Phycologia 49: 554–573.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kawaguchi, S. 1993. Taxonomic notes on the Halymeniaceae (Rhodophyta) from Japan, II. Halymenia rotunda Okamura. Jpn. J. Phycol. 41: 303–313.Google Scholar

  • Kawaguchi, S., K. Lewmanomont and K.J. McDermid. 2002. Morphology of Halymenia maculata J. Agardh from Vietnam. In: (I.A. Abbott, ed.) Taxonomy of economic seaweeds with reference to some Pacific species. Vol. 8, La Jolla: California Sea Grant College Program, La Jolla, CA. pp. 259–266.Google Scholar

  • Kawaguchi, S., S. Shimada, H.W. Wang and M. Masuda. 2004. The new genus Yonagunia Kawaguchi & Masuda (Halymeniaceae, Rhodophyta), based on Y. tenuifolia Kawaguchi & Masuda sp. nov. from southern Japan and including Y. formosana (Okamura) Kawaguchi & Masuda comb. nov. from southeast Asia. J. Phycol. 40: 180–192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kim, M.S., S.Y. Kim and W.A. Nelson. 2010. Symphocladia lithophila sp. nov. (Rhodomelaceae, Ceramiales), a new Korean red algal species based on morphology and rbcL sequences. Bot. Mar. 53: 233–241.Google Scholar

  • Kim, S.Y., T.H. Seo, J.K. Park, G.H. Boo, K.M. Kim and S.M. Boo. 2012. Cryptonemia rotunda (Halymeniales) and Schizymenia apoda (Nemastomatales), two new records of red algae from Korea. Algae 27: 1–8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kraft, G.T. 1977. The morphology of Grateloupia intestinalis from New Zealand, with some thoughts on generic criteria within the family Cryptonemiaceae (Rhodophyta). Phycologia 16: 43–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kylin, H. 1956. Die Gattungen der Rhodophyceen. Lund: C.W.K. Gleerups. i-xv, 1–673 pp. 458 figs.Google Scholar

  • Lin, S.-M., H.-Y. Liang and M.H. Hommersand. 2008. Two types of auxiliary cell ampullae in Grateloupia (Halymeniaceae) including G. taiwanensis sp. nov. and G. orientalis sp. nov. from Taiwan based on rbcL gene sequence analysis and cystocarp development. J. Phycol. 44: 196–214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nelson, W.A. 2012. Phylum Rhodophyta: red algae. In: (D.P. Gordon, ed.) New Zealand inventory of biodiversity. Vol. 3. Canterbury University Press, Canterbury. pp. 327–346.Google Scholar

  • Nelson, W.A. and L. Phillips. 1996. The Lindauer legacy: current names for the Algae Novae-Zelanicae Exsiccatae. New Zeal. J. Bot. 34: 553–582.Google Scholar

  • Nelson, W.A., L.E. Phillips and N.M. Adams. 1998. Algal type material and historical phycological collections in the herbarium of the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa (WELT). Tuhinga 10: 63–85.Google Scholar

  • Okamura, K. 1936. Nippon Kaiso Shi (in Japanese). Uchida-Rokakuho, Tokyo.Google Scholar

  • Posada, D. and K.A. Crandall. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817–818.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Posada, D. and K.A. Crandall. 2001. Selecting the best-fit model of nucleotide substitution. Syst. Biol. 50: 580–601.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rambaut, A. and A.J. Drummond. 2007. Tracer v1.4. Available at: http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer.

  • Ramírez, M.E. and B. Santelices. 1991. Catálogo de las algas marinas bentónicas de la costa temperada del Pacífico de Sudamérica. Monografías Biológicas 5: 1–437.Google Scholar

  • Ronquist, F. and J.P. Huelsenbeck. 2003. MrBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Russell, L.K., C.L. Hurd, W.A. Nelson and J.E. Broom. 2009. An examination of Pachymenia and Aeodes (Halymeniaceae, Rhodophyta) in New Zealand and the transfer of two species of Aeodes in South Africa to Pachymenia. J. Phycol. 45: 1389–1399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Saunders, G.W., A. Chiovitti and G.T. Kraft. 2004. Small-subunit rRNA gene sequences from representatives of selected families of the Gigartinales and Rhodymeniales (Rhodophyta). 3. Recognizing the Gigartinales sensu stricto. Can. J. Bot. 82: 43–74.Google Scholar

  • Schneider, C.W., C.E. Lane and G.W. Saunders. 2010. Notes on the marine algae of the Bermudas. 11. More additions to the benthic flora and a phylogenetic assessment of Halymenia pseudofloresii (Halymeniales, Rhodophyta) from its type locality. Phycologia 49: 154–168.Google Scholar

  • Stamatakis, A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688–2690.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thiers, B. 2014. Index herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium. Available at: http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/. Accessed on January 2014.

  • Wang, H.W., S. Kawaguchi, T. Horiguchi and M. Masuda. 2000. Reinstatement of Grateloupia catenata (Rhodophyta, Halymeniaceae) on the basis of morphology and rbcL sequences. Phycologia 39: 228–237.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wang, H.W., S. Kawaguchi, T. Horiguchi and M. Masuda. 2001. A morphological and molecular assessment of the genus Prionitis J. Agardh (Halymeniaceae, Rhodophyta). Phycol. Res. 49: 251–261.Google Scholar

  • Wittmann, W. 1965. Aceto-iron-haematoxylin-chloral hydrate for chromosome staining. Stain Tech. 40: 161–164.Google Scholar

  • Womersley, H.B.S. and J. A. Lewis. 1994. Family Halymeniaceae Bory 1828: 158. In: The Marine Benthic Flora of Southern Australia’. Part IIIA. Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra. pp. 167–218.Google Scholar

  • Yagi, S. 1938. On the marine algae of Susaki, prov. Izu, and its vicinity III. Sci. Pap. Inst. Algol. Res., Fac. Sci., Hokkaido Imp. Univ., Vol. II: 131–153.Google Scholar

  • Yoon, H. S., J. D., Hackett, G. Pinto and D. Bhattacharya. 2002. The single, ancient origin of chromist plastids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 15507–15512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zuccarello, G.C. and G.M. Lokhorst. 2005. Molecular phylogeny of the genus Tribonema (Xanthophyceae) using rbcL gene sequence data: monophyly of morphologically simple algal species. Phycologia 44: 384–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zuccarello, G.C., G. Burger, J.A. West and R.J. King. 1999. A mitochondrial marker for red algal intraspecific relationships. Mol. Ecol. 8: 1443–1447.Google Scholar

About the article

Corresponding author: Roberta D’Archino, National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd, Private Bag 14-901, Wellington 6241, New Zealand, e-mail:

Received: 2014-02-10

Accepted: 2014-04-24

Published Online: 2014-05-15

Published in Print: 2014-06-01

Citation Information: Botanica Marina, Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages 185–201, ISSN (Online) 1437-4323, ISSN (Print) 0006-8055, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bot-2014-0008.

Export Citation

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Roberta D’Archino, Showe-Mei Lin, Paul W. Gabrielson, and Giuseppe C. Zuccarello
European Journal of Phycology, 2016, Volume 51, Number 1, Page 83
Wendy Nelson, Kate Neill, Roberta D’Archino, Tara Anderson, Jenny Beaumont, and Jenn Dalen
Marine Biodiversity, 2015, Volume 45, Number 4, Page 797

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in