Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Botanica Marina

Editor-in-Chief: Dring, Matthew J.


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.919
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.336

CiteScore 2018: 1.22

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.399
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.672

Online
ISSN
1437-4323
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 62, Issue 5

Issues

Commercialization of Irish moss aquaculture: the Canadian experience

James S. CraigieORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4020-6914 / M. Lynn Cornish
  • Acadian Seaplants Limited, Dr. J.S. Craigie Research Center, 4 Bren Street, Cornwallis, NS B0S 1H0, Canada
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Louis E. Deveau
Published Online: 2019-09-04 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bot-2019-0017

Abstract

Irish moss traditionally has been valued for its hydrocolloid composition. Recognition that natural harvests would not meet the expected demands for its biomass led to experimental pilot-scale cultivation based on principles used in agriculture. Innovative technologies and systems for aquaculture management were devised when those from agriculture or mariculture were not directly transferrable. Periods of rapid progress and of consolidation due to disruptive external events were encountered, a cycle not uncommon during the introduction of a new technology. Certain key decisions in the background matrix that ultimately led to Irish moss cultivation are reviewed together with an overview of the main critical events that affected progress. The Chondrus crispus aquaculture as practiced today is essentially a modified form of precision agriculture operating year-round with c. 3.4 ha of on-land culture tanks and up to 75 employees during the peak season. Beginning with new Irish moss seedstock from the library/nursery, the crop is generated through a closely controlled, vertically integrated system of cultivation that after approximately 18 months increases the biomass more than 50,000-fold. After harvesting it is processed into the final food-grade products to meet the stringent demands of the export market.

This article offers supplementary material which is provided at the end of the article.

Keywords: aquaculture; Chondrus crispus; cultivation; food products; Irish moss

References

  • Adnan, H. and H. Porse. 1987. Culture of Eucheuma cottonii and Eucheuma spinosum in indonesia. Hydrobiologia 151/152: 355–358.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Andrews, J.H. 1976. The pathology of marine algae. Biol. Rev. 52: 211–253.Google Scholar

  • Anon. 1967. Minutes: Meeting to Further the Development of the Canadian Marine Plants Industry. Industrial Development Service, Department of Fisheries of Canada, Halifax, N.S., 5 and 6 April 1967.Google Scholar

  • Bidwell, R.G.S., J. McLachlan and N.D.H. Lloyd. 1985. Tank cultivation of Irish moss. Bot. Mar. 28: 87–97.Google Scholar

  • Bixler, H.J. and H. Porse. 2011. A decade of change in the seaweed hydrocolloid industry. J. Appl. Phycol. 23: 321–335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bliss, A. 1985. Carrageen. In: Notes and Queries 32: 382–384. Available at: http://nq.oxfordjournals.org/content/32/3/382 (accessed March 21, 2019).Crossref

  • Bourarab, K., P. Potin, J. Correa and B. Kloareg. 1999. Sulfated oligosaccharides mediate the interaction between a marine red alga and its green algal pathogenic endophyte. Plant Cell 11: 1635–1650.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buchholz, C.M., G. Krause and B.H. Buck. 2012. Seaweed and man. In: (C. Wiencke and K. Bishof, eds) Seaweed ecophysiology & ecology, Edition: Ecological Studies, Chapter 22. Springer. pp. 471–493.Google Scholar

  • Buggeln, R.G. and J.S. Craigie. 1973. The physiology and biochemistry of Chondrus crispus Stackhouse. In: (M.J. Harvey and J. McLachlan, eds) Chondrus crispus. Proc. N.S. Inst. Sci., Supplement to volume 27. pp. 81–102.Google Scholar

  • Buschmann, A.H., C. Camus, J. Infante, A. Neori, Á. Israel, M.C. Hernandez-Gonzales, S.V. Pereda, J.L. Gomez-Pinchetti, Á. Goldberg, N. Tadmor-Shalev and A.T. Critchley. 2017. Seaweed production: overview of the global state of exploitation, farming and emerging research activity. Eur. J. Phycol. 52: 391–406.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, L.C-M., J.S. Craigie, E.L. McCandless, J.L. McLachlan, A.C. Neish, P.F. Shacklock and J.A. Walter. 1975. Algal polysaccharide production. United States Patent No. 3,879,890, April 29, 1975.

  • Chen, L.C-M., K. Morgan and F.J. Simpson. 1982. Selection of tetrasporophytes of Irish moss. Bot. Mar. 25: 35–36.Google Scholar

  • Chopin, T. 1986. The red alga Chondrus crispus stackhouse (Irish moss) and carrageenans – a review. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences No. 1514. Charlottetown, P.E.I., Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada.Google Scholar

  • Chopin, T. and R. Ugarte. 2006. The seaweed resources of Eastern Canada: 46 p. In: (A.T. Critchley, M. Ohno and D.B. Largo, eds) World seaweed resources. An authoritative reference system. A multimedia, interactive DVD-ROM. ETI Bioinformatics Publishers, Amsterdam. ISBN: 90 75000 80 4.Google Scholar

  • Collén, J., M.L. Cornish, J. Craigie, E. Ficko-Blean, C. Hervé, S.A. Krueger-Hadfield, C. Leblanc, G. Michel, P. Potin, T. Tonon and C. Boyen. 2014. Chondrus crispus – a present and historical model organism for red seaweeds. Adv. Bot. Res. 71: 53–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Correa, J.A. and J. McLachlan. 1991. Endophytic algae of Chondrus crispus (Rhodophyta). III. Host specificity. J. Phycol. 27: 448–459.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Correa, J.A. and J. McLachlan. 1994. Endophytic algae of Chondrus crispus (Rhodophyta). V. Fine structure of the infection by Acrochaete operculata (Chlorophyta). Eur. J. Phycol. 29: 33–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Craigie, J.S. 1980. Metal analysis of seawater and fertilizers from the MCL pilot plant at Charlesville, N.S. Atlantic Regional Laboratory Technical Report for Marine Colloids Canada Limited. 10 pp.Google Scholar

  • Craigie, J.S. 1990a. Cell walls. In: (K.M. Cole and R.G. Sheath, eds) Biology of the red algae. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 221–257.Google Scholar

  • Craigie, J.S. 1990b. Irish moss cultivation: some reflections. In: (C. Yarish and C.A. Penniman, eds) Economically important plants of the Atlantic: their biology and cultivation. Marine Sciences Institute, University of Connecticut at Avery Point, Groton, CT. pp. 37–52.Google Scholar

  • Craigie, J.S. 1999. Background and principles of seaweed aquaculture. Bull. Aquacult. Canada 99–1: 1–7.Google Scholar

  • Craigie, J.S. 2007. Aquaculture of Irish moss a nova scotian success story. Aquaculture Association of Nova Scotia, Annual Meeting, Halifax, N.S., Keynote address, January 26.Google Scholar

  • Craigie, J.S. and J.A. Correa. 1996. Etiology of infectious diseases in cultivated Chondrus crispus (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta). Hydrobiologia 326/327: 97–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Craigie, J.S. and P.F. Shacklock. 1989. Culture of Irish moss. In: (A.D. Boghen, ed) Cold-water aquaculture in Atlantic Canada. Canadian Institute for Research on Regional Development, Moncton, NB, Canada. pp. 243–270.Google Scholar

  • Craigie, J.S. and P.F. Shacklock. 1995. Culture of Irish moss. In: (A.D. Boghen, ed), Cold-water aquaculture in Atlantic Canada. 2nd edition. Canadian Institute for Research on Regional Development, Moncton, NB, Canada. pp. 363–390.Google Scholar

  • Deveau, L.E. and J.R. Castle. 1976. The industrial development of farmed marine algae: the case history of Eucheuma in the Philippines. In: (T.V.R. Pillay and W.A. Dill, eds) Advances in aquaculture, Chapter V. Culture of algae and seaweeds. Kyoto, Japan. FAO Technical Conference on Aquaculture. pp. 409–415.Google Scholar

  • Doty, M.S. 1973. Farming the red seaweed, Eucheuma, for carrageenan. Micronesia 9: 59–73.Google Scholar

  • Doty, M.S. 1987. The production and use of Eucheuma. In: (M.S. Doty, J.F. Caddy and B. Santelices, eds) Case study of seven commercial seaweed resources. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 281. Rome, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. pp. 123–161.Google Scholar

  • Edwards, M., D. Hanniffy, S. Heesch, J. Hernández-Kantún, M. Moniz, B. Quéguineur, J. Ratcliff, A. Soler-Vila and A. Wan. 2012. Macroalgae Fact-sheets. (by A. Soler-Vila and M. Moniz, eds). Ryan Institute, NUI Galway.Google Scholar

  • Enright, C.T. 1978. Competitive interaction between Chondrus crispus (Rhodophyceae) and Ulva lactuca (Chlorophyceae) in Chondrus aquaculture. Proc. Int. Seaweed Symp. 9: 209–218.Google Scholar

  • Enright, C.T. and J.S. Craigie. 1981. Effects of temperature and irradiance on growth and respiration of Chondrus crispus Stackh. Proc. Int. Seaweed Symp. 10: 271–276.Google Scholar

  • FAO 2018a. The global status of seaweed production, trade and utilization, by F. Ferdouse, Z. Yang, S.L. Holdt, P. Murúa and R. Smith, FAO Consultants. Globefish Research Programme Volume 124. Rome. 120 pp. Available at: https://www.fao.org/3/ca1121en.pdf (accessed June 3, 2019).

  • FAO. 2018b. (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Available at: http://www.fao.org/3/i9540en.pdf.

  • Ffrench, R.A. 1970. The Irish moss industry: Canadian Atlantic. pp. xi, 230. Ottawa, Department of Fisheries and Forestry, Industrial Development Branch, Fisheries Service.Google Scholar

  • Frazer, W. 1864. Elements of materia medica: containing the chemistry and natural history of drugs, their effects, doses, and adulterations, with observations on all the new remedies recently introduced into practice, and on the preparations of the British pharmacopœia. 2nd edition. John Churchill and Sons, London. pp. 388–389.Google Scholar

  • Gellenbeck, K.W. 2011. Utilization of algal materials for nutraceutical and cosmeceutical applications – what do manufacturers need to know? J. Appl. Phycol. 24: 309–313.Google Scholar

  • Genicot, S., A. Préchoux, G. Correc, N. Kervarec, G. Simon and J.S. Craigie. 2018. Carrageenans: new tools for new applications. In: (S. LaBarre and S.S. Bates, eds) Blue biotechnology: production and use of marine molecules. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. Chapter 12, pp. 369–414.Google Scholar

  • Gridgeman, N.T. 1979. Biological sciences at the National Research Council of Canada: the early years to 1952. Wilfred Laurier Press, Waterloo, ON. December 24, pp. 153.Google Scholar

  • Haas, P. and T.G. Hill. 1921. On carrageen. Chondrus crispus. Ann. Appl. Biol. 7: 352–362.Google Scholar

  • Hafting, J.T., J.S. Craigie, D.B. Stengel, R.R. Loureiro, A.H. Buschmann, C. Yarish, M.D. Edwards and A.T. Critchley. 2015. Prospects and challenges for industrial production of seaweed bioactives. J. Phycol. 51: 821–837.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harvey, M.J. and J. McLachlan (eds). (1973). Chondrus crispus. Proc. N. S. Inst. Sci. 127 Supplement, 155 pp.Google Scholar

  • Hughes, G.C. 1983. Studies of Petersenia pollagaster, a fungal parasite of Chondrus crispus, Irish moss. NRC Contract 080-198/0-6316, Final Report, 1 December 1983. 97 pp.Google Scholar

  • Humm, H.J. 1951. The red algae of economic importance: agar and related phycocolloids. In: (D.K.Tressler and J. McW. Lemon, eds) Marine products of commerce. Reinhold Publishing Corp, New York. pp. 47–93.Google Scholar

  • Indergaard, M.P. 2017. The First International Seaweed Symposium held in Edinburgh, UK, 1952: applied seaweed science coming of age. J. Appl. Phycol. 29: 2165–2173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jouanneau, D., M. Guibet, P. Boulenguer, J. Mazoyer and W. Helbert. 2010a. Enzymatic degradation of hybrid ι-/v- carrageenans by Alteromonas fortis ι-/v- carrageenase. Carbohydr. Res. 345: 934–940.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jouanneau, D., M. Guibet, P. Boulenguer, J. Mazoyer, M. Smietana and W. Helbert. 2010b. New insights into the structure of hybrid ι-/μ-carrageenan and its alkaline conversion. Food Hydrocolloids 24: 452–461.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kim, J.K., C. Yarish, E.K. Hwang, M. Park and Y. Kim. 2017. Seaweed aquaculture: cultivation technologies, challenges and its ecosystem services. Algae 32: 1–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Laite, P. and M. Ricohermoso. 1981. Revolutionary impact of Eucheuma cultivation in the south china sea on the carrageenan industry. Proc. Int. Seaweed Symp. 10: 595–600.Google Scholar

  • Lewis, J.G., N.F. Stanley and G.G. Guist. 1988. Commercial production and applications of algal hydrocolloids. In: (C.A. Lembi and J.R. Waaland, eds) Algae and human affairs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 205–236.Google Scholar

  • Li, W., T. Zhang, X. Tang and B. Wang. 2010. Oomycetes and fungi: important parasites of marine algae. Acta Oceanol. Sinica 29: 74–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lim, J.R. and H. Porse. 1981. Breakthrough in the commercial culture of Eucheuma spinosum in Northern Bohol, Philippines. Proc. Int. Seaweed Symp. 10: 601–606.Google Scholar

  • Loucks, R.H. 1984. Commercial aquaculture of Chondrus crispus by acadian seaplants limited and the national research council of canada. Commercially Confidential Report by Loucks Oceanology Limited., March 1984.Google Scholar

  • Lundgren, G. 1981. Opening address to the symposium. Proc. Int. Seaweed Symp. 10: 3–4.Google Scholar

  • MacFarlane, C.I. 1956. Irish moss in the maritime provinces. Bulletin published by the Nova Scotia Research Foundation, Halifax, Nova Scotia. pp. 20.Google Scholar

  • MacFarlane, C.I. 1966. A report on some aspects of the seaweed industry in the Maritime Provinces of Canada. Department of Fisheries, Industrial Development Service, Ottawa. pp. 24.Google Scholar

  • MacFarlane, C.I. 1968. The cultivation of seaweeds in Japan and its possible applications in the maritime provinces of Canada. Industrial Development Services, Department of Fisheries of Canada, Ottawa, ON. pp. 96. www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/library/1144.pdf.

  • MacRae, J.S. 1977. The First Quarter Century. Published by the Staff Association, Atlantic Regional Laboratory, NRCC, Halifax, NS, September 1977. pp. 114.Google Scholar

  • Marshall, S.M., L. Newton and A.P. Orr. 1949. A study of certain British seaweeds and their utilization in the preparation of agar. Ministry of Health and Ministry of Supply, HM Stationery Office. pp. 184.Google Scholar

  • McHugh, D.J. 1987. Production and utilization of products from commercial seaweeds. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. FAO Technical Paper No. 288, FAO, Rome. pp. 194. (accessed March 17, 2016).Google Scholar

  • McLachlan, J.L. 1991. Chondrus crispus (Irish moss), an ecologically important and commercially valuable species of red seaweed of the North Atlantic Ocean. In: (J. Mauchline and T. Nemoto, eds) Marine biology: its accomplishment and future prospect. Elsevier, New York, University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo. pp. 217–233.Google Scholar

  • Mitchell, M.E. and M.D. Guiry. 1983. Carrageen: a local habitation or a name? J. Ethnopharmacol. 9: 347–351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Molina, F.I. 1986. Petersenia pollagaster (Oomycetes): an invasive pathogen of Chondrus crispus (Rhodophyceae). Chapter 15. In: (S.T. Moss, ed) The biology of marine fungi. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 165–176.Google Scholar

  • Molina, F.I., G.C. Hughes and J.S. Craigie. 1988. Temperature influenced infection rates in the Chondrus crispusPetersenia pollagaster pathosystem: a regression analysis. Mar. Biol. 97: 431–433.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moseley, C.M. 1990. The effect of cultivation conditions on the yield and quality of carrageenans in Chondrus crispus. In: (I. Akatsuka, ed) Introduction to Applied Phycology. SBP Academic Publishing bv, The Hague, The Netherlands. pp. 565–574.Google Scholar

  • Naylor, J. 1976. Production, trade and utilization of seaweeds and seaweed products. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. No. 159: FAO Rome. pp. 73.Google Scholar

  • Needler, A.W.H. 1947. Irish moss industry of the maritime provinces. Atlantic Biological Station General Series Circular 10: 1–5. Fisheries Research Board of Canada.Google Scholar

  • Neish, A.C. 1968. Marine agriculture – the prospects are good for crops from the Sea. Sci. Forum 1: 15–16.Google Scholar

  • Neish, A.C. 1971. Vegetative propagation of Irish moss (Chondrus crispus). Proceedings Meeting on the Atlantic Seaweeds Industry, October 5–6, 1971. Industrial Development Branch, Fisheries Services, Ottawa. pp. 31–32.Google Scholar

  • Neish, A.C. and C.H. Fox. 1971. Greenhouse experiments on the vegetative propagation of Chondrus crispus (Irish moss). National Research Council of Canada, Atlantic Regional Laboratory Technical Report no. 12.Google Scholar

  • Neish, A.C., P.F. Shacklock, C.H. Fox and F.J. Simpson. 1977. The cultivation of Chondrus crispus, factors affecting growth under greenhouse conditions. Can. J. Bot. 55: 2263–2271.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Neish, I.C. 1976a. An overview of progress in the Irish moss cultivation program of Marine Colloids Limited. October 12, 1976, Applied Marine Research Limited, I.C. Neish 1976. Confidential Report for Marine Colloids Limited, Dartmouth, N.S. pp. 17.Google Scholar

  • Neish, I.C. 1976b. Role of mariculture in the Canadian seaweed industry. J. Fish. Res. Bd Canada 33: 1007–1014.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nussinovitch, A. 1997. Carrageenans. In hydrocolloid applications. Gum technology in the food and other industries. Chapman & Hall, Springer, Blackie Academic & Professional, London. pp. 40–62.Google Scholar

  • O’Neill, A.N. 1955. Derivatives of 4-O-β-D-galactopyranosyl-3,6-anhydro-D-galactose from kappa-carrageenin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77: 6324–6326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Painter, T.J. 1983. Algal polysaccharides. In: (G.O. Aspinall, ed) The polysaccharides. Elsevier. pp. 195–285.Google Scholar

  • Parker, H.S. 1976. Seaweed farming in the sulu sea. Oceans. Number 2: 12–19. A Publication of the Oceanic Society, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar

  • Percival, E. and R.H. McDowell. 1967. Chemistry and enzymology of marine algal polysaccharides. Academic Press, London and New York. pp. 219.Google Scholar

  • Pereira, J. 1840. The elements of materia medica. London, Longman, part 2, pp. 564.Google Scholar

  • Pereira, R. and C. Yarish. 2008. Mass production of marine macroalgae. In: (E.J. Jørgensen and B.D. Fath, Editor-in-Chief) Ecological engineering. Vol. [3] of Encyclopedia of Ecology, 5 vols. Elsevier, Oxford. pp. 2236–2247.Google Scholar

  • Pereira, R., C. Yarish and A.T. Critchley. 2012. Seaweed aquaculture for human foods in land-based and IMTA systems. In: (B.A. Costa-Pierce and G.G. Page, eds) Sustainability science in aquaculture. In: (B.A. Costa-Pierce, ed) Ocean farming and sustainable aquaculture science and technology. Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology. Springer Science, N.Y. pp. 9109–9128.Google Scholar

  • Pringle, J.D. and A.C. Mathieson. 1987. Chondrus crispus Stackhouse. In: (M.S. Doty, J.F. Cady and B. Santelices, eds) Case study of seven seaweed resources. Rome, FAO Fisheries Technical Report 281. pp. 49–122.Google Scholar

  • Rees, D.A. 1972. Shapely polysaccharides. The eighth Colworth medal lecture. Biochem. J. 126: 257–273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rebours, C., E. Marinho-Soriano, J.A. Zertuche-González, L. Hayashi, J.A. Vásquez, P. Kradolfer, G. Soriano, R. Ugarte, M.H. Abreu, I. Bay-Larsen, G. Hovelsrud, R. Rodven and D. Robledo. 2014. Seaweeds: an opportunity for wealth and sustainable livelihood for coastal communities. J. Appl. Phycol. 26: 1939–1951. Epub 2014 May 03.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ricohermoso, M.A. and L.E. Deveau. 1979. Review of commercial propagation of Eucheuma (Florideophyceae) clones in the Philippines. Proc. Int. Seaweed Symp. 9: 525–531.Google Scholar

  • Shacklock, P.F. and G.B. Croft. 1981. Effect of grazers on Chondrus crispus in culture. Aquaculture 22: 331–342.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shacklock, P.F. and R.W. Doyle. 1983. Control of epiphytes in seaweed cultures using grazers. Aquaculture 31: 141–151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shacklock, P.F., D. Robson and F.J. Simpson. 1973. The propagation of Irish moss in tanks. Comparative growth at different locations, 1973. Technical Report No. 19, Atlantic Regional Laboratory, National Research Council of Canada.Google Scholar

  • Shacklock, P.F., D.R. Robson and F.J. Simpson. 1975. The propagation of Irish moss in tanks. Comparative growth at different locations, 1974. Technical Report No. 20, Atlantic Regional Laboratory, National Research Council of Canada.Google Scholar

  • Simmonds, P.L., A.G. Findlay and D.G. Laing. 1854. On some undeveloped and unappreciated articles of raw produce from different parts of the world. J. Soc. Arts 3: 33–48. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41323542 (accessed May 10, 2018).

  • Simpson, F.J., A.C. Neish, P.F. Shacklock and D.R. Robson. 1978. The cultivation of Chondrus crispus. The effect of pH on growth and production of carrageenan. Bot. Mar. 21: 229–235.Google Scholar

  • Simpson, F.J. and P.F. Shacklock. 1979. The cultivation of Chondrus crispus. The effect of temperature on growth and carrageenan production. Bot. Mar. 22: 295–298.Google Scholar

  • Smith, D.B. and W.H. Cook. 1953. Fractionation of carrageenin. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 45: 232–233.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, H.M. 1905. The seaweed industries of Japan: The utilization of seaweeds in the United States. Bull. US Bureau Fish. 24: 169–181.Google Scholar

  • Snaith, W.E., C.I. MacFarlane and H.D. Johnston. 1969. Some notes on the marine plants industry in Canada. Ottawa, Department of Fisheries and Forestry, Industrial Development Branch, November 1969, 11 pp., plus Appendix, 2 pp.Google Scholar

  • Stanford, E.C.C. 1862. On the economic applications of seaweed. J. Soc. Arts, 10: 185–195.Google Scholar

  • Stanley, N.F. 1987. Production, properties and uses of carrageenan. In: (D.J. McHugh, ed) Production and utilization of products from commercial seaweeds. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Rome, FAO Technical Paper No. 288, Chapter 3, pp.194.Google Scholar

  • Stanley, N.F. 1990. Carrageenans. In: (P. Harris, ed) Food gels. Elsevier, London, New York. pp. 79–119.Google Scholar

  • Staples, L. and J.S. Craigie. 1989. Control of Petersenia pollagaster in Chondrus crispus cultures. Technical Report No. 59, Atlantic Research Laboratory, National Research Council of Canada., 12 p., 1 Figure. NRCC No. 30155. Commercially confidential.Google Scholar

  • Staples, L.S., P.F. Shacklock and J.S. Craigie. 1995. Rapid growth of clones of the red alga Chondrus crispus: applications in assays of toxic substances and in physiological studies. Mar. Biol. 122: 471–477.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stévant, P., C. Rebours and A. Chapman. 2017. Seaweed aquaculture in Norway: recent industrial developments and future perspectives. Aquacult. Int. 25: 1373–1390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stoloff, L. 1949. Irish moss – from art to an industry. Econ. Bot. 3: 428–435.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stortz, C.A. 2005. Carrageenans. Structural and conformational studies. In: (K.J. Yarema, ed) Handbook of carbohydrate engineering. Taylor and Francis, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. pp. 211–245.Google Scholar

  • Tacon, A.G.J. 2018. Global trends in aquaculture and compound aquafeed production. The Magazine of the World Aquaculture Society 49: 33–46.Google Scholar

  • Taylor, A.R.A. and L.C.-M. Chen. 1994. Chondrus Stackhouse. In: (I. Akatsuka, ed) Biology of economic algae. The Hague, SPB Academic Publishers bv. pp. 35–76.Google Scholar

  • Tseng, C.K. 1947. Seaweed resources of North America and their utilization. Econ. Bot. 1: 69–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tseng, C.K. 1981a. Marine phycoculture in China. Proc. Int. Seaweed Symp. 10: 123–152.Google Scholar

  • Tseng, C.K. 1981b. Commercial cultivation. In: (C.S. Lobban and M.J. Wynne, eds) The biology of seaweeds. University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles. pp. 680–725.Google Scholar

  • Turner, D. 1808. Fuci, sive, plantarum fucorum generi a botanicis ascriptarum icons, descriptions et historia. Arch, London, Volume 1, p. 160. Available at: https://books.google.com.books.about (accessed March 06, 2018).

  • Valderrama, D., J. Cai, N. Hishamunda and N. Ridler (eds). 2013. Social and economic dimensions of carrageenan seaweed farming. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper 580. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. pp. 217.Google Scholar

  • Weinberger, F. and P. Potin. 2010. Red algal defences in the genomics age. In: (J. Seckbach and D.J. Chapman, eds) Red algae in the genomic age. Cellular origin, life in extreme habitats and astrobiology, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 457–477.Google Scholar

  • Witt, H.J. 1985. Nature’s most versatile hydrocolloid. In: (R.R. Colwell, E.R. Pariser and A.J. Sinskey, eds) Biotechnology of marine polysaccharides. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington. pp. 345–360.Google Scholar

  • Woodward, F.N. 1966. The seaweed industry of the future. Proc. Int. Seaweed Symp. 5: 55–69.Google Scholar

  • Yaphe, W. 1959. The determination of κ-carrageenin as a factor in the classification of the Rhodophyceae. Can. J. Bot. 37: 751–757.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yaphe, W. and B. Baxter. 1955. The enzymic hydrolysis of carrageenin. Appl. Microbiol. 3: 380–383.Google Scholar

  • Young, E.G. and J.L. McLachlan. 1966. Foreward. Proc. Int. Seaweed Symp. 5: xi–xii.Google Scholar

About the article

James S. Craigie

James S. Craigie PhD, Queen’s University, ON, is Researcher Emeritus, National Research Council of Canada (NRCC) and Science Advisor to Acadian Seaplants Limited. As a former editor (Journal of Phycology), President of the Canadian Society of Plant Physiologists, and Adjunct Professor (Dalhousie University, Halifax), he has received various awards (Botanical Society of America, Phycological Society of America, Marinalg International, Province of Nova Scotia, Queen Elizabeth II Golden Jubilee Award, and the NRCC Centennial Award (1916–2016). Algal metabolites, their principal polysaccharides, and land-based, high-productivity aquaculture of seaweeds are among his current interests.

M. Lynn Cornish

A graduate of Dalhousie University (Faculty of Agriculture) with a BSc in Agricultural Soils, M. Lynn Cornish has worked in agriculture as a private consultant, and currently manages her own production-oriented farming operation. Lynn is a long-term employee at Acadian Seaplants Limited, where she oversees annual production of the seedstock inoculum for the company. In addition, she provides technical assistance for the sales and marketing teams. Following her MSc in Biology at St. Francis Xavier University, she continues to research and write scientific reviews on special topics concerning the health benefits of dietary seaweeds.

Louis E. Deveau

Louis E. Deveau is Chairman and Founder of Acadian Seaplants Limited, a Nova Scotian seaweed biotech company, an Officer of the Order of Canada, and the recipient of four honorary doctorate degrees. Inducted into the Nova Scotia Business Hall of Fame, Mr. Deveau continues to receive government and industry recognition as an entrepreneur, innovator and businessman. As former President of Marine Colloids Canada Ltd.; Philippine Marine Inc., Manila; Gel Mex, Mexico, and vice-president of Marine Colloids Inc., he brings more than 50 years of experience and dedication to the seaweed industry.


Received: 2019-03-26

Accepted: 2019-08-06

Published Online: 2019-09-04

Published in Print: 2019-09-25


Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest regarding this article.


Citation Information: Botanica Marina, Volume 62, Issue 5, Pages 411–432, ISSN (Online) 1437-4323, ISSN (Print) 0006-8055, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bot-2019-0017.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Supplementary Article Materials

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in