Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences Technical Sciences

The Journal of Polish Academy of Sciences

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 1.156
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.238

CiteScore 2016: 1.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.457
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.239

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-1917
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 61, Issue 1 (Mar 2013)

Issues

Doing Hirsch proud; shaping H-index in engineering sciences

L. Czarnecki
  • Corresponding author
  • Building Research Institute, 1 Filtrowa St., 00-611 Warsaw, Poland Faculty of Civil Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, 16 Armii Ludowej Ave., 00-637 Warsaw, Poland
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ M.P. Kaźmierkowski
  • Institute of Control and Industrial Electronics, Warsaw University of Technology, 75 Koszykowa St., 00-662 Warsaw
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ A. Rogalski
  • Institute of Applied Physics, Military University of Technology, 2 Kaliskiego St., 00-908 Warsaw, Poland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2013-05-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bpasts-2013-0001

Abstract

The h-index concept has been analysed in aspects of a contemporary tendency of parameterisation of everything and as the potential measure of the knowledge progress, which recognises individuals, institutions and Engineering sub-disciplines that best generate new knowledge. Considerations have been presented at the level of universality of knowledge which implies permanent progress and on the base of careful thoughts of the domestic experience. The h-nature of things has been described, and several axiomatic characterisations of the Hirsch index have been gathered. The mechanism how to increase the h-index has been presented. Some similarities between h-index and the journal impact factor (JIF) have been stressed. Also the universal role of H-index in ranking countries in all areas and in Engineering has been exampled in extended tables.

The Glänzel’s model which connects the h-index with two fundamental scientometric indicators: number of publications and the rate of citation, has been analysed. Following the Microsoft Academic Search, the lists of 15 top scientists from various academic disciplines and separately in Engineering have been composed. It has been found that the population of the best keeps basically the same relations between the h-index and a number of publication, and between the h-index and a citation number. However, even the best in Engineering should publish 2 times a year or more papers to receive the same h-index as top scientists in overall domains.

The h-index distribution of domestic Engineering sub-disciplines has been presented and analysed in statistic categories. The suitable hhistograms and the cumulative probability density function (CPDF) have been elaborated for 21 sub-disciplines and thereupon the Engineering sub-disciplines have been arranged into three clusters. It has been demonstrated that Engineering as the whole and Engineering sub-disciplines are underestimated, compared to other academic disciplines. The adequate normalisation factors have been suggested.

Several other conclusions considered the h,H-indices as the measure of the knowledge progress addressed to individual researchers and to collective, e.g., journals, institutions, organisations, countries, adequately have been written. The h,H-indices are the general measure of the position of the given subject (person or organisation) but cannot be universal.

Keywords : bibliometric indicators; citations; citation metrics; h-index; H-index; country rank; SCImago indicator; disciplines; domestic Engineering sub-disciplines; statistics

  • [1] L. Czarnecki, “Challenges towards civil engineering environment in a light of scientific policy assumptions” Engineeringand Construction 9, 499-502 (2011), (in Polish).Google Scholar

  • [2] J.E. Iglesias and C. Pecharroman, “Scaling the h-indexes for Different Scientific ISI Fields”, Scientometrics 73 (1), 303-320 (2007).Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [3] www.beggerbrains.comGoogle Scholar

  • [4] E. Ecco, The Infinity of Lists, Mac Lehose Press, London, 2009Google Scholar

  • [5] B.E. Lautrup “Measure for measures”, Nature 444, CD-ROM (2006).Google Scholar

  • [6] M. Porter, “Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life”, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1995.Google Scholar

  • [7] C.K. Życzkowski ,“Citation graph, weighted impact factors and performance indices”, Scientometrics 85, 301-315 (2010).Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [8] A. Sawicki ,“Picture of the Polish science after MNiSW ranking”, Academic Forum 11, CD-ROM (2010), (in Polish).Google Scholar

  • [9] P. Heymann, A. Paepcke, and H. Garcia-Molina, “Tagging Human Knowledge”, http://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/956/2/ltocsuper-preprint.pdf (2009).Google Scholar

  • [10] A.W. Harzing and R. van der Wall ,“Comparing the Google Scholar h-index with the ISI Journal Impact Factor”, Researchin Int. Management Products and Services for Academics 1, www.harzing.com/hindexjournals.htm (2008).Google Scholar

  • [11] A.W. Harzing and R. van der Wall, “A google scholar h-index for journals: a better metric to measure journal impact in economics and business”, www.harzing.com (2007).Google Scholar

  • [12] J.K. Vanclay, “Impact factor: outdated artifact or stepping-stone to journal certification”, Scientometrics doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0561-0 (2012).Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [13] R. Rousseau,“Updating the journal impact factor or total overhaul?”, Scientometrics doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0649-1 (2012).Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [14] E. Garfield, “Citation indexes to science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas”, Science 122 (3159), 108-111 (1955).Google Scholar

  • [15] E. Garfield, “The agony and the ecstasy - the history and meaning of the journal impact factor” Int. Congress on PeerReview and Biomedical Publication 1,www.eugengarfield.org (2005).Google Scholar

  • [16] A. Rogalski, M. Kaźmierkowski, and L. Czarnecki, “Technical sciences in international rankings”, Academic Forum 9, 34-38 (2012), (in Polish).Google Scholar

  • [17] A. Osielawska,“Evaluation measures of journals and scientists”, EBIB 8, CD-ROM (2008), www.ebib.info/2008/-99a.php?osielawskaGoogle Scholar

  • [18] Kuan-Teh Jeang “Impact factor, H-index, peer comparisons and retrovirology: is it time to individualize citation metrics?”, Retrovirology 4 (42), www.retrovirology.com/content/4/1/42 (2007).Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [19] N. Adler and A.W. Harzing,“When knowledge wins: transcending the sense and nonsense of academic ranking”, Academyof Management Learning and Education 1, www.harzing.com (2009).Google Scholar

  • [20] P.A. Lawrence “Lost in publication: how measurement harms science” Ethics Sci. Environ. Polit. 8, 9-11 (2008).Google Scholar

  • [21] P.A. Lawrence “Rank injustice: the misallocation of credit is endemic in science”, Nature 415, 835-836 (2002).Google Scholar

  • [22] J.E. Hirsch “An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output”, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., PNAS 102, 46: 16569 (2005).Google Scholar

  • [23] R. Kierzek “Polish science in Hirsch index”, Science Matters 6-7, 137 (2008), (in Polish).Google Scholar

  • [24] J.E. Hirsch “Does the h-index have predictive power?”, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 2, 7080646 (2007).Google Scholar

  • [25] SJR - Scimago J. and Country Rank Retrieved, http://www.scimajor.com (2012).Google Scholar

  • [26] G.J. Woeginger, “An axiomatic characterization of the Hirsch index”, Material Social Sciences 56, 224-232 (2008).Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [27] M. Kosmulski, “I-a bibliometric Index”, Academic Forum 11, 31 (2011), (in Polish).Google Scholar

  • [28] G. Prathap, “Hirsch - type indices for ranking institutions scientific research output”, Current Science 91 (11), 1439 (2006).Google Scholar

  • [29] P.D. Batista, “Is it possible to compare researcher with different scientific interests?”, Scientometrics 68 (1), 179-189 (2006).Google Scholar

  • [30] E. Lillquist and S. Green, “The discipline dependence of citation statistics”, Scientometrics 84, 749-768 (2010).Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [31] I. Podlubny, “Comparison of scientific impact expressed by the number of citations in different fields of science”, Scientometrics 64 (1), 95-99 (2005).Google Scholar

  • [32] K. Sangwal “On the relation between citation of publication output and hirsch index h of authors: conceptualization of tapered hirsch index ht, circulation area radius r and citation acceleration”, Scientometrics 93, 987-1004 (2012).Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [33] S. Alonso, “H-index: a review focused on its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields” J. Informetrics 3, 273-289 (2009).Google Scholar

  • [34] W. Gl¨anzel “On the h-index - a mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact”, Scientometrics 67 (2), 315-321 (2006).Google Scholar

  • [35] W. Gl¨anzel “H-index concatenation”, Scientometrics 77 (2), 369-372 (2008).Google Scholar

  • [36] E. Csajbok, “Hirsch index for countries based on essential science indicators data”, Scientometrics 73 (1), 91-117 (2007).Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [37] Microsoft Academic Search, http://academic.research.microsoft.com/.Google Scholar

  • [38] Chemistry World www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/News/2007/- April/23040701.asp.(2011).Google Scholar

  • [39] The h-index for Computer Science www.cs.ucla.edu/-palsberg/h-numi/.Google Scholar

  • [40] G. Gugliota “The genius index: one scientists crusade to rewrite reputation rules”, Wired Magazine, www.wired. com/culture/geekipedia/magazine/17-06/mf-impactfactor?- currentP/(2009).Google Scholar

  • [41] A. Sidiropoulous, D. Katsaros, and Y. Monolopoulos, “Generalized h-index for revealing latent facts in social networks of citations”, Scientometrics 72 (2), 253-280 (2007).Google Scholar

  • [42] M. Żylicz, “Parametric evaluation today and tomorrow”, Academic Forum 6, http://www.forumakad.pl/archiwum/2006/06/22 ocena parametryczna.html (2006).Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-05-01

Published in Print: 2013-03-01


Citation Information: Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Technical Sciences, ISSN (Print) 0239-7528, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bpasts-2013-0001.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in