Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Baltic Screen Media Review

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2346-5522
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Tallinn Film Cluster: Realities, Expectations and Alternatives

Indrek Ibrus / Külliki Tafel-Viia / Silja Lassur / Andres Viia
Published Online: 2015-12-05 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bsmr-2015-0002

Abstract

The article takes a close look at the entrepreneurial practices of the Estonian film industry and at how these particular practices may be understood to influence the evolution of the film production cluster in Tallinn. It asks how these processes of institutional evolution of the local film industry may be understood to influence the specific nature of audiovisual culture in contemporary Estonia. The article is based on a study that was conducted in mid 2012. The study consisted of interviews with the representatives of the local film industry, including respondents from production companies (“studios”), post-production companies and distributors. The second phase of the study was a confirmative roundtable with the select group that included the previously interviewed filmmakers and a few additional industry insiders. The key research questions were: (1) what are the existing co-operation practices between companies like and (2) considering the further evolution of the industry cluster in Tallinn, what are the companies’ specific expectations and needs. The current status of the cluster’s competitiveness was evaluated by using Michael Porter’s model for analyzing conditions of competition (Porter’s diamond). Also, development perspectives of the cluster were evaluated, considering the needs and expectations of entrepreneurs. Key results of the research were divided into two basic categories: (1) current state of clustering of AV enterprises and (2) perspectives and alternatives of further development of the AV cluster.

References

  • Atkinson, R.; Flint, J. 2004. ‘Snowball sampling’. - M. S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, T. F. Liao (eds.), Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods, Vol 1. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1044-1045.Google Scholar

  • Banks, M.; Lovatt A.; O’Connor J.; Raffo, C. 2000. ‘Risk and trust in the cultural industries’. - Geoforum, 31, 453-464.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boix, R.; Lazzeretti L.; Hervàs J. L.; Miguel B. 2011. ‘Creative clusters in Europe: a microdata approach’. Paper presented at the European Congress of Regional Science Association International, ERSA, Barcelona.Google Scholar

  • Burmeister, K.; Neef, A.; Albert, B.; Glockner, H. 2002. Zukunftsforschung und Unternehmen. Praxis, Methoden, Perspektiven. Essen: Z punkt GmbH Büro für Zukunftsgestaltung.Google Scholar

  • Castells, M. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Davis, C. H.; Creutzberg, T.; Arthurs D. 2009. ‘Applying an innovation cluster framework to a creative industry: The case of screen-based media in Ontario.’ - Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 11, 201-214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deuze, M. 2007. Media Work. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

  • Evans, G. 2009a. ‘Creative cities, creative spaces and urban policy’. - Urban Studies, 45, 5&6, 1003-1040.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Evans, G. 2009b. ‘From cultural quarters to creative clusters - creative spaces in the new city economy’. - Legner, M.; Ponzini, D. (eds.), The Sustainability and Development of Cultural Quarters: International Perspectives. Stockholm: Institute of Urban History, 32-59.Google Scholar

  • European Commission 2013. Preparing for a Fully Converged Audiovisual World: Growth, Creation and Values. Green Paper, COM (2013), 231.Google Scholar

  • Gill, R. 2007. Technobohemians or the New Cybertariat? New Media Work in Amsterdam a Decade after the Web.Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.Google Scholar

  • Gordon, I. R; McCann, P. 2000. ‘Industrial clusters: complexes, agglomerations and/or social networks’. - Urban Studies, 37, 513-533.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Granovetter, M. 1985. ‘Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness’. - American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harrison, B. 1992. ‘Industrial districts: old wine in new bottles?’ - Regional Studies, 26, 469-483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heijden, K. van der 1996. Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

  • Hoover, E. M. 1948. The Location of Economic Activity.New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

  • Hsieh, H.-F.; Shannon, S. E. 2005. ‘Three approaches to qualitative content analysis’. - Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277-1288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Laherand, M.-L. 2008. Kvalitatiivne uurimisviis. Tallinn.Google Scholar

  • Lazzeretti L.; Boix, R.; Capone, F. 2008. Do Creative Industries Xluster? Mapping Creative Local Production Systems in Italy and Spain. Working Paper 08.05. Departament d’Economia Aplicada, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona.Google Scholar

  • Lorenzen, M. 2007. Creative Encounters in the Film Industry: Content, Cost, Chance, and Collection, Creative Encounters Working Papers No. 3. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.Google Scholar

  • Marshall, A. 1925. Principles of Economics. 8th edn.London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar

  • Mccann, P. 1995. ‘Rethinking the economics of location and agglomeration’. - Urban Studies, 32, 563-577.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moses, L. 1958. ‘Location and the theory of production’. - Quarterly Journal of Economics, 78, 259-272.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Porter, M. E. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar

  • Porter, M. E. 1998. ‘Clusters and the new economic competition’. - Harvard Business Review, 76, 77-90.Google Scholar

  • Porter, M. E. 2001. ‘The competitive advantage of nations’. - Harvard Business Review, March-April, 73-93.Google Scholar

  • Potts, J.; Cunningham, S.; Hartley, J.; Ormerod, P. 2008. ‘Social network markets: A new definition of the creative industries’. - Journal of Cultural Economy, 32, 167-185.Google Scholar

  • Potts, J.; Keane, M. 2011. ‘Creative clusters and innovation’. - Potts, J., Creative Industries and Economic Evolution. Chelthenham: Edward Elgar, 152-161.Google Scholar

  • Pratt, A. 2004. ‘Creative clusters: towards the governance of the creative industries production system?’ - Media International Australia 112, 50-66.Google Scholar

  • Roodhouse, S. 2006. Cultural Quarters: Principles and Practice. Bristol: Intellect.Google Scholar

  • Sölvell, Ö.; Lindqvist, G.; Ketels, C. 2003. The Cluster Initiative Greenbook. Stockholm: Ivory Tower.Google Scholar

  • Tafel-Viia, K.; Viia, A.; Terk, E.; Ibrus, I.; Lassur, G. 2011.Google Scholar

  • Väike- ja mikroloomeettevõ tete arengutsükkel. Tallinn: Tallinn University’s Estonian Institute for Futures Studies. van Dijk, J. 2006. The Network Society. 2nd edn. London: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Wirtz, B. W. 2001. ‘Reconfi guring of value chains in converging media and communications markets’. - Long Range Planning, 34, 489-506. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2015-12-05

Published in Print: 2013-10-01


Citation Information: Baltic Screen Media Review, Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 6–27, ISSN (Online) 2346-5522, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bsmr-2015-0002.

Export Citation

© 2015. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in