Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Baltic Screen Media Review

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2346-5522
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Politics of Imperceptibility: Philosophy, Post-Feminism and New Media Arts

Audrone Žukauskaite
Published Online: 2015-12-05 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bsmr-2015-0005

Abstract

The essay discusses Deleuze and Guattari’s notion of becoming-imperceptible and raises the question to what extent it can be interpreted in terms of feminist politics and seen as a specific strategy for new media arts. Although the notion of becoming-imperceptible was condemned by second wave feminists, recent post-feminists representing the third wave argue not for politics of visibility but for politics of invisibility. Examining the practices of Lithuanian feminist media artists, the essay argues that becoming-imperceptible in new media arts means not an escape from visibility or a drive toward annihilation but a new conceptual strategy: becoming-imperceptible creates the potential for social and political change. This new conceptual strategy can be related to the new quality of the image: in this regard there is a close affinity between Deleuze and Guattari’s notion of becoming-imperceptible and the notion of the crystalline image which appears in Deleuze’s film theory: both notions engender duration, temporality and qualitative change. Therefore the essay claims that the crystalline image does not represent the world but recreates this world through multiple, changing and virtual images.

References

  • Braidotti, R. 1994. Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

  • Braidotti, R. 2005. Metamorphoses: Towards a Materialist Theory of Becoming. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

  • Braidotti, R. 2006. Transpositions: On Nomadic Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

  • Braidotti, R. 2006. ‘The ethics of becoming-imperceptible’.” - C. V. Boundas (ed.), Deleuze and Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 133-159.Google Scholar

  • Deleuze, G. 2008. Cinema 2: The Time-Image. Trans. H. Tomlinson; R. Galeta. London, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

  • Deleuze, G.; Guattari, F. 2004a. Anti-Oedipus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. R. Hurley,; M. Seem; H. R. Lane. London, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

  • Deleuze, G.; Guattari. F. 2004b. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. B. Massumi. London, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

  • Deleuze, G.; Parnet, C. 2006. Dialogues II. Trans. H. Tomlinson, B. Habberjam. New York, London: Continuum.Google Scholar

  • Grosz, E. 1994. Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

  • Grosz, E. 2000. ‘Deleuze’s Bergson: Duration, the virtual and a politics of the future’. -I. Buchanan, C. Colebrook (eds.), Deleuze and Feminist Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 214-234.Google Scholar

  • Grosz, E. 2005. Time Travels: Feminism, Nature, Power. Crow’s Nest: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

  • Phelan, P. 1996. Unmarked: The Politics of Performance. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Rodowick, D. N. 1997. Gilles Deleuze’s Time Machine. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

  • Weinstein, J. 2008. ‘Introduction part II’. - C. Colebrook, J. Weinstein (eds.), Deleuze and Gender. Deleuze Studies, vol. 2. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 20-33.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2015-12-05

Published in Print: 2013-10-01


Citation Information: Baltic Screen Media Review, ISSN (Online) 2346-5522, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bsmr-2015-0005.

Export Citation

© 2015. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in