Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Central and Eastern European Review

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1752-7503
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Technology Parks in Poland As an Element of Public Proinnovation Policy—Selected Results from Empirical Research

Marek Wróblewski
  • Corresponding author
  • University of Wrocław, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of International Studies ul. Koszarowa 3, 51-149 Wrocław, Poland
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ dr hab. prof. UWr. Leszek Kwieciński
  • Professor University of Wroclaw, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of International Studies, ul. Koszarowa 3, 51-149 Wrocław, Poland
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2018-01-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/caeer-2018-0001

Abstract

Nowadays, regional pro-innovation policy concentrates on the creation of endogenous economic resources that are intended to become the main driving force for regional economic growth. In current economic conditions, this resource refers primarily to the paradigm of the knowledge economy. Hence the crucial importance of regional policy is to support the development of innovative enterprises. At the same time, a prerequisite for the more dynamic development of innovative enterprises, and thus the development of the region, is to implement efficient pro-innovation policy instruments. Therefore the main research aim of this paper is to define how the technology parks in Poland, as a regional tool of the public pro-innovation policy, could stimulate innovations as well as competitiveness of SME. The article will be based mostly on the empirical approach, presenting selected results of the nationwide research project financed by the National Science Centre of Poland. The obtained initial empirical data suggest that technology parks in Poland expand highly-specialized services for their tenant enterprises to a very limited extent and focus on basic and routine aspects of their operations (rental, day-to-day administration of premises and equipment etc). In effect, the technology parks in Poland have played so far a very limited role in practice as a stimulus of innovativeness of SME. The study used the method of systemic analysis and also the empirical method (PAPI) for primary data collections.

Keywords: technology parks; pro-innovation public policy; international competitiveness; innovation

References

  • Allen J. (2007), Third generation science parks, Manchester Science Park Ltd. Manchester. Arrow K., ‘Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention’, in Groves, H.M. (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, NBER.Google Scholar

  • Bartkiewicz P., Dębowski H. (2010), Ocena wpływu polityki spójności na wzrost konkurencyjności i innowacyjności polskich przedsiębiorstw i gospodarki. Raport końcowy, Instytut Badań Strukturalnych [An evaluation of a sustained development policy’s influence on the increase of competitiveness andGoogle Scholar

  • innovation in the Polish economy and companies. The end report, The Institute of Structural Analysis], Warsaw. Cornell University, INSEAD and the World Intellectual Property Organization, WIPO, The Global Innovation Index 2015, Effective Innovation Policies for Development, Geneva.Google Scholar

  • Działalność innowacyjna przedsiębiorstw w latach 2012-2015 [The innovative activities of enterprises in the years 2012-2015], GUS, Warsaw 2015. European Commission, Innovation Union Scoreboard 2015, Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, Brussels.Google Scholar

  • Gmurczyk J. (2014), Innowacyjność polskiej gospodarki. Stan obecny i rekomendacje [The Innovation of the Polish economy. The current state and recommendations], The Civic Institute, Warsaw.Google Scholar

  • Hausner J. (2008), Zarządzanie publiczne [Public governance], Scholar, WarszawaGoogle Scholar

  • Hauser J. (ed.) (2015), Państwo i my. Osiem grzechów głównych Rzeczpospolitej, Wyd. Fundacja gospodarki i administracji publicznej [The state and us. Eight cardinal sins of the Republic of Poland, Publisher by The Foundation for the economy and public administration], Cracow.Google Scholar

  • Jessop B. (2002), The Future of the Capitalist State, Cambridge Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar

  • Jessop B. (2007), Promowanie dobrego rządzenia i ukrywanie jego słabości, [w:] Zarządzanie publiczne Nr 2, [The promotion of good management and the hiding of its weaknesses, [in:] Public management no 2], Scholar, Warsaw.Google Scholar

  • Jessop B., Sum N.-L. (2006), Beyond the Regulation Approach. Putting the Capitalist State in its Place, Northampton.Google Scholar

  • Kooiman J. (2000), ’Societal governance. Levels, modes and order soft socialpolitical interaction’, in Debating Governance: Authority Steering and Democracy, Oxford.Google Scholar

  • Książek E. (2011), ‘Ewolucja i zmiana zakresu usług parku na rzecz lokatorów i klientów’, in Matusiak K.B. (red.), Strategiczne obszary rozwoju parków technologicznych [‘The evolution and change of the range of services of a park in view of tenants and customers’, in Matusiak K.B. (ed.), The strategic areas of the development of technology parks], PARP, Warsaw. Google Scholar

  • Kwieciński L. (2005), Parki technologiczne jako element polityki badawczorozwojowej w Polsce i w krajach Unii Europejskiej [Technology parks as an element of the Research and Development Policy in Poland and the EU countries], Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.Google Scholar

  • Luhmann N. (2007), Systemy społeczne. Zarys ogólnej teorii [Social systems. An outline of the general theory] Nomos, Warsaw.Google Scholar

  • Majone G. (2004), The proofs, arguments, and persuasion in the political process, Scholar, Warsaw.Google Scholar

  • Matusiak K.B. (2011), ‘Wyzwania strategiczne rozwoju parków technologicznych’, inGoogle Scholar

  • Matusiak K.B. (red.), Strategiczne obszary rozwoju parków technologicznych [‘The strategic challenge of the development of technology parks’, in Matusiak K.B. (ed.), The strategic areas of the development of technology parks], Wyd. PARP, Warsaw.Google Scholar

  • Mazur S. (2015), ‘Założenia teoretyczne i metodologiczne nauk o polityce publicznej’, in Wrocławskie Studia Politologiczne Nr 18/2015 [‘The theoretical and methodological assumptions of the public policy science’, in Wrocław Studies in Politology no 18/2015], Wyd. Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław.Google Scholar

  • Nelson R. (1959), The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research, The Journal of Political, No 67.Google Scholar

  • OECD (2010), The Innovation Policy Mix In OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar

  • Teubner G. (1993), Law as an Autopoietic System, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

  • Weresa M. (2014), Polityka innowacyjna [Innovation policy], Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warsaw.Google Scholar

  • Wilke H. (2007), Tragedia państwa. Prolegomena do teorii państwa i policentrycznego społeczeństwa, in Zarządzanie publiczne Nr 1 [‘The state’s tragedy. A prolegomena to the theory of state and a poly-centre society’, in Public management no 1], Scholar, Warsaw.Google Scholar

  • Williamson O.E. (2000), ‘The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead’, in The Journal of Economic Literature, 38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-01-23

Published in Print: 2017-12-20


Citation Information: Central and Eastern European Review, Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 1–26, ISSN (Online) 1752-7503, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/caeer-2018-0001.

Export Citation

© 2018. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in