Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems

Climate Change, Social Changes, Technological Development

Ed. by Fürst, Christine / Geneletti, Davide

1 Issue per year


Emerging Science

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-3669
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Using the Concepts of Resilience, Vulnerability and Adaptability for the Assessment and Analysis of Agricultural Systems

Daniel Callo-Concha
  • Corresponding author
  • Center for Development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn, Walter-Flex-Str. 3., 53113, Bonn, Germany. Tel: +49 228 731795, Fax: +49 228 731889
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Frank Ewert
  • Institute of Crop Science and Resources Conservation, University of Bonn, Katzenburgweg 5, 53115, Bonn, Germany
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2014-03-10 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cass-2014-0001

Abstract

Resilience, vulnerability and adaptability have emerged as dominant concepts in the study of disturbance and change of social-ecological systems. We analyze the conceptual, methodological and operational aspects in using these concepts for the assessment and analysis of agricultural systems and try to identify differences and possible overlaps between them. The analysis is performed considering a number of published studies on agricultural systems over a wide geographical range where these concepts have been applied. Our results show a clear conceptual overlap and often the exchangeable use of the concepts. Furthermore, the driving methodological and operational criteria for their application could not be separated unambiguously. It was, thus, difficult to identify guiding principles for the operational application of the individual concepts. We stress that the operationalization of these concepts requires consistency in the approaches and protocols to ensure their coherent use. We also argue that the conceptual and operational integration of resilience, vulnerability and adaptability would perhaps lead to a more complete portrayal of the behavior of agricultural systems in changing situations. But this requires more research including the development of operational protocols for which the premises of complexity, participation and functionality seem key.

Keywords : disruption; change; evaluation; operationalization; integration

References

  • [1] Dilley M., Budreau T., Coming to terms with vulnerability: a critique of the food security definition, Food Policy, 2001, 26, 229-247.Google Scholar

  • [2] Vogel C., Moser S.C., Kasperson R.E., Dabelko G.D., Linking vulnerability, adaptation, and resilience science to practice: Pathways, players, and partnerships, Global Environ. Chang., 2007, 17, 349-364.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [3] Janssens M.A., Ostrom E., Resilience, Vulnerability, and Adaptation: A cross-cutting theme of the International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change, Global Environ. Chang., 2006, 16, 237-239.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [4] Boko M., Niang I., Nyong A., Vogel C., Githeko A., Medany M., et al., Africa, In: Parry M.L., Canziani O.F., Palutikof J.P., van der Linden P.J., Hanson C.E. (Eds.), Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability Working Group II Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

  • [5] Holling C., Resilience and stability of ecological systems, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 1973, 4, 1-23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6] Gunderson L.H., Holling C.S., Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, Island Press, 2002.Google Scholar

  • [7] Berkes V.F., Colding J., Folke C., Navigating social-ecological systems, Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

  • [8] Walker B., Carpenter S., Anderies J., Abel N., Cumming G.S., Janssen M. et al., Resilience management in social-ecological systems: a working hypothesis for a participatory approach, Conserv. Ecol., 2002, 6, 14.Google Scholar

  • [9] Smit B., Wandel J., Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability, Global Environ. Chang., 2006, 16, 282-292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [10] Folke C., Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for socialecological systems analyses, Global Environ. Chang., 2006, 16, 253-267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11] Adger W.N., Hughes T.P., Folke C., Carpenter S.R., Rockstrom J. Social-Ecological Resilience to Coastal Disasters, Science, 2005, 309, 1036-1039.Google Scholar

  • [12] Gallopin G.C., Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity, Global Environ. Chang., 2006, 16, 293-303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13] Adger W. Vulnerability, Global Environ. Chang., 2006, 16, 268-281.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [14] Turner B.L., Kasperson R.E., Matson P.A., McCarthy J.J., Corell R.W., Christensen L., et al., A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science, Proc. Natl. Acad. .Sci. USA, 2003, 100, 8074-8079.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [15] Rounsevell M.D.A., Reginster, I. Araujo M.B., Carter T.R., Dendoncker N., Ewert F. et al., Scenario-Based Studies of Future Land Use in Europe, Agriculture, Ecosys. Environ., 2006, 145, 57-68.Google Scholar

  • [16] Kasperson R.E., Dow K., Archer E., Caceres D., Downing T., Elmqvist T., et al., Vulnerable people and places, In: Hassan R., Scholes R., Ash, N. (Eds.), Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing: Current State and Trends, Vol. 1. Island Press, 2005.Google Scholar

  • [17] IPCC, Climate Change 2007 Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, In: Parry M.L., Canziani O.F. Palutikof J.P., van der Linden P.J., Hanson C.E. (Eds.), Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

  • [18] Acosta-Michlik L., Espaldon V. Assessing vulnerability of selected farming communities in the Philippines based on a behavioural model of agent’s adaptation to global environmental change, Global Environ. Chang., 2008, 18, 554-563.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [19] Futuyama D.J., Evolutionary Biology, Sinauer Associates, 1997.Google Scholar

  • [20] Denevan W.M., Adaptation, variation and cultural geography, Prof. Geog, 1983, 35, 399-40.Google Scholar

  • [21] O’Brien M.J., Holland T.D., The Role of Adaptation in Archaeological Explanation, Am. Antiquity, 1992, 57(1): 36-59Google Scholar

  • [22] Butzer K.W., Adaptation to Global Environmental Change, Prof. Geog., 1980, 32, 269-278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [23] Pielke R.A., Rethinking the role of adaptation in climate policy, Global Environ. Chang., 1998, 8, 159-170.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [24] Torrico J.C., Janssens J.J. Rapid assessment methods of resilience for natural and agricultural systems, An. Acad. Bras. Cienc., 2010, 82, 1-11.Google Scholar

  • [25] Adaptation, Encyclopedia Britannica, 2010.Google Scholar

  • [26] Gunderson L.H., Interactions between social resilience and ecological crises, In: Berkes F., Colding J., Folke C. (Eds.), Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change, Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

  • [27] Stringer L.C., Dougill A.J., Fraser E., Hubacek K., Prell C., Reed M.S., Unpacking “participation” in the adaptive management of social-ecological systems: a critical review, Ecol. Soc., 2006, 11, 39.Google Scholar

  • [28] Folke C., Colding J., Berkes F., Synthesis: building resilience and adaptive capacity in social-ecological systems, In Berkes F., Colding J., Folke C. (Eds.), Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change, Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

  • [29] Walker B., Meyers J.A., Thresholds in ecological and social- ecological systems: a developing database, Ecol. Soc., 2004, 9, 3.Google Scholar

  • [30] Van der Leeuw S., Vulnerability and the integrated study of socio-natural phenomena, IHDP Update, 2/01, 6-7, 2001.Google Scholar

  • [31] Young O.R., Berkhout F., Gallopin G.C., Janssen M.A., Ostrom E., van der Leeuw S., The globalization of socio-ecological systems: An agenda for scientific research, Global Environ. Chang., 2006, 16, 304-316.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [32] Chapin F.S., Kofinas G., Folke C., Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship, Springer, 2009Google Scholar

  • [33] Vogel C., Resilience, vulnerability and adaptation: A crosscutting theme of the International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change, Global Environ. Chang., 2006, 16, 235-236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [34] Jackson L., van Noordwijk M., Bengtsson J., Foster W., Lipper L., Pulleman M., et al., Biodiversity and agricultural sustainagility: from assessment to adaptive management, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sust., 2010, 2, 80-87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [35] Funtowicz S., Ravetz J., Costanza R., Post-Normal Science, In: Cutler J.C. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Earth, Environmental Information Coalition, National Council for Science and the Environment, Washington D.C., USA, 2008.Google Scholar

  • [36] Allison H.E., Hobbs R.J., Resilience, adaptive capacity, and the “Lock-in trap” of the Western Australian agricultural region, Ecology and Society, 2004, 9, 3.Google Scholar

  • [37] Saldana-Zorrilla S.O., Stakeholders’ views in reducing rural vulnerability to natural disasters in Southern Mexico: Hazard exposure and coping and adaptive capacity, Global Environ. Chang., 2008, 18, 583-597.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [38] Luers A., Lobell D., Sklar L., Addams C.L., Matson P., A method for quantifying vulnerability, applied to the agricultural system of the Yaqui Valley Mexico, Global Environmental Change, 2003, 13:255-267Google Scholar

  • [39] Belliveau S., Smit B., Bradshaw B., Multiple exposures and dynamic vulnerability: Evidence from the grape industry in the Okanagan Valley Canada, Global Environ. Chang., 2006, 16, 364-378.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [40] Tyler N., Turi J., Sundset M., Strom K., Sara M., Reinert E., et al., Saami reindeer pastoralism under climate change: Applying a generalized framework for vulnerability studies to a sub-arctic social-ecological system, Global Environ. Chang., 2007, 17, 191-206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [41] Liu C., Golding D., Gong G., Farmers’ coping response to the low flows in the lower Yellow River: A case study of temporal dimensions of vulnerability, Global Environ. Chang., 2008, 18, 543-553.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [42] Milestad, R., Hadatsch S., Organic farming and social-ecological resilience: the alpine valleys of Solktaler Austria, Conserv. Ecol., 2003, 8, 3.Google Scholar

  • [43] Carpenter S., Walker B., Anderies J.M., Abel N., From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what?, Ecosystems, 2001, 4, 765-781Google Scholar

  • [44] Carr E.R., Between structure and agency: Livelihoods and adaptation in Ghana’s Central Region, Global Environ. Chang., 2008, 18, 689-699.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [45] Bertalanffy L. von, An Outline of General System Theory, Brit. J. Phil. Sci., 1950, 1, 134-165.Google Scholar

  • [46] Hart R., Conceptos basicos sobre agroecosistemas. CATIE. Turrialba, Costa Rica, 1985.Google Scholar

  • [47] Giampietro M., Multi-scale integrated analysis of agroecosystems, CRC Press, 2003.Google Scholar

  • [48] Gallopin G.C., Human dimensions of global change: linking the global and the local processes, Int. Soc. Sci. J., 1991, 130, 707-718.Google Scholar

  • [49] Marquardt K., Burning Changes. Action research with Farmers and Swidden Agriculture in the Upper Amazon, PhD thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden, 2008.Google Scholar

  • [50] Leakey R., Living with the Trees of Life: Towards the Transformation of Tropical Agriculture, CABI, 2012.Google Scholar

  • [51] Callo-Concha D., Denich M., A framework to assess multifunctionality in agricultural land-use systems applying multicriteria and multivariate analyses and stakeholders participation. Case study: biodiversity in agroforestry systems of Tome-Acu, northern Brazil (in press).Google Scholar

  • [52] Callo-Concha D., M. Denich, Operationalizing environmental services of agroforestry systems: Functional biodiversity assessment in Tome-Acu, Para, Brazil. In Montagnini F. (Ed.) Agroforestry as a Tool for Landscape Restoration: challenges and opportunities for success, Nova Science Publishers, 2010: 143-156. Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2014-03-10


Citation Information: Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems, ISSN (Online) 2300-3669, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cass-2014-0001.

Export Citation

© 2014 Daniel Callo-Concha, Frank Ewert. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Nicolas Urruty, Delphine Tailliez-Lefebvre, and Christian Huyghe
Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2016, Volume 36, Number 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in