Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems

Climate Change, Social Changes, Technological Development

Ed. by Inostroza, Luis / Fürst, Christine

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Ecosystem Services – Examples of Their Valuation Methods in Czech Republic and Slovakia

Zuzana Sarvašová / Miroslav Kovalčík / Zuzana Dobšinská / Jaroslav Šálka / Vilém Jarský
Published Online: 2014-12-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cass-2014-0008


This literature review deals with the understanding of ecosystem services related to the question of their applicability and appropriate methods for their valuation. We distinguish between ecological valuation methods that aim to assess the significance of landscape characteristics, conventional economic, i.e. monetary valuation and non-monetizing valuation or assessment. Ecological evaluation methods derive values by following a cost of production approach which neglects consumer preferences. Economic valuation methods focus on the exchange value of ecosystem services, i.e. they are based on consumer preferences, but do not adequately take into account the complex internal structure of ecosystems. We conclude that – from the view of implementation of ecosystem services for policy support and consulting – successful valuation approaches should particularly consider the relationships between economic, ecological and social aspects of ecosystem services’ provision.

Keywords : Ecosystem services; ecosystem processes; ecosystem functions; ecological, sociocultural and economic value of ecosystems; cost of production; exchange value; consumer preferences


  • [1] Costanza R., d’Arge R., de Groot R.S., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., et al., The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387, 253–260. Google Scholar

  • [2] Daily G.C. (Ed.), Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC, 1997. Google Scholar

  • [3] Carpenter S.R., Turner M., Opening the black boxes: Ecosystem science and economic valuation. Ecosystems 2000, 3, 1–3. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [4] Farber S., Costanza R., Wilson M., Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ., 2002, 41, 375–392. Google Scholar

  • [5] Chee Y.E., An ecological perspective on the valuation of ecosystem services. Biol. Conserv., 2004, 120, 549–656. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6] Heal G.M., Barbier E.B., Boyle K.J., Covich A.P., Gloss S.P., Hershner C.H., et al., Valuing ecosystem services: Toward better environmental decision making. The National Academies Press, Washington, 2005. Google Scholar

  • [7] De Groot R.S., Wilson M.A., Boumans R.M.J., A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol. Econ., 2002, 41, 393–408. Google Scholar

  • [8] Lyons K.G., Brigham C.A., Traut B.H., Schwartz M.W., Rare species and ecosystem functioning. Conserv. Biol., 2005, 19, 1019–1024. Google Scholar

  • [9] Hermann A., Schleifer S., Wrbka T., The concept of ecosystem services regarding landscape research: A review. Living Rev. Landscape Res. 2011, 5, 1 http://www.livingreviews.org/ lrlr-2011-1. Google Scholar

  • [10] Hector A., Joshi J., Scherer-Lorenzen M., Schmid B., Spehn E.M., Wacker L., et al., Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: Reconciling the results of experimental and observational studies. Funct. Ecol., 2007, 21, 998–1002. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11] Gómez-Baggethun E., de Groot R., Lomas P.L., Montes C., The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecol. Econ., 2010, 69, 6, 1209-1218. Google Scholar

  • [12] De Groot R.S., Functions of Nature: Evaluation of Nature in Environmental Planning, Management and Decision Making. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen, 1992. Google Scholar

  • [13] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current States and Trends. Island Press, Washington, DC, 2005. Google Scholar

  • [14] De Groot R.S., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L., Willemen L., Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol. Complexity, 2010, 7, 260–272. Google Scholar

  • [15] Howarth R., Farber S., Accounting for the value of ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ., 2002, 41, 421–429. Google Scholar

  • [16] Howarth R.B., Wilson M.A., A theoretical approach to deliberative valuation: Aggregation by mutual consent. Land Econ., 2006, 82 (1), 1–16. Google Scholar

  • [17] Limburg K.E., O’Neil R.V., Costanza R., Farber S., Complex systems and valuation. Ecol. Econ., 2002, 41, 409–420. Google Scholar

  • [18] Liu S., Costanza R., Farber S., Troy A., Valuing ecosystem services. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2010, 1185, 54–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05167.x CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [19] National Research Council, Valuing Ecosystem Services: Toward Better Environmental Decision-Making. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2005. Google Scholar

  • [20] US Environmental Protection Agency Science Advisory Board, Valuing the Protection of Ecological Systems and Services, 2009, http://www.epa.gov/sab. Google Scholar

  • [21] TEEB, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundation. Earthscan, Cambridge, 2010. Google Scholar

  • [22] Kareiva P., Tallis H., Ricketts T.H., Daily G.C., Polasky S., Natural Capital. Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services. Oxford University Press, 2011. Google Scholar

  • [23] UK National Ecosystem Assessment, The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis of the Key Findings, UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, 2011. Google Scholar

  • [24] Polasky S., Theory of ecosystem services, In: Ecosystem Services Seminar Series, 2011 http://www.moore.org/ecosystemservicesseminar. html. Google Scholar

  • [25] European Commission. Our life insurance, our natural capital: An EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. COM (2011) 244 final, Brussels. Google Scholar

  • [26] Hauck J., Görg C., Varjopuro R., Ratamäki O., Jax K., Benefits and limitations of the ecosystem services concept in environmental policy and decision making: Some stakeholder perspectives. Environ. Sci. Policy, 2013, 25 13–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [27] Oslo Mandate, 2011, http://www.forestnegotiations.org/sites/ default/files/oslo2011_mandate_14-16june2011.pdf. Google Scholar

  • [28] Vyskot I. (Ed.)., Quantification and Evaluation of Forest Functions on the Example of the Czech Republic, Ministry of Environment of the Czech Republic, Prague, 2003, 218 Google Scholar

  • [29] Carpenter S.R., Mooney H.A., Agard J., Capistrano D., DeFries R.S., Diaz S., et al., Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 2009, 106 (5), 1305–1312. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [30] Freeman A.M., The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values. Resources for the Future, Washington DC, USA, 1993. Google Scholar

  • [31] Willis K.G., Corkindale J.T. (Eds.), Environmental Valuation: New Perspectives, CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom, 1995. Google Scholar

  • [32] O’Connor M., Spash C., Valuation and the Environment: Theory, Method and Practice, Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA, 1999. Google Scholar

  • [33] Renn O., Webler T., Wiedemann P. (Eds.), Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (The Netherlands), 1995. Google Scholar

  • [34] Kahn J.R., The Economic Approach to Environmental and Natural Resources. Thomson-Southwestern, Mason, OH, 2005. Google Scholar

  • [35] Haase G., Zur Ableitung und Kennzeichnung von Naturraumpotentialen. Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen 1978, 122, 113–125 (in German) Google Scholar

  • [36] Neef E., Landscapes as the integration field of human regional work, Geologie en Mijnbouw 1983, 62, 531–534. Google Scholar

  • [37] Bastian O., Schreiber K.F. Analyse und ökologische Bewertung der Landschaft Google Scholar

  • [in German]. 2nd ed., Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg–Berlin, 1999. Google Scholar

  • [38] Hueting R. Moet de natuur worden gekwantificeerd? (Should nature be quantified?). Economica Statistische Berichten 1970, 55 (2730), 80–84. Google Scholar

  • [39] Helliwell D.R. Valuation of wildlife resources. Regional Studies 1969,3, 41–49 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [40] Odum E.P., Odum H.T., Natural areas as necessary components of man’s total environment, In: Transactions of the Thirty Seventh North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 1972, 37, 178–189. Google Scholar

  • [41] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC, 2003. Google Scholar

  • [42] Turner R.K., Paavola J., Cooper P., Farber S., Jessamy V., Georgiou S., Valuing nature: Lessons learned and future research directions, Ecol. Econ., 2003, 46, 492–510. Google Scholar

  • [43] Haines-Young R.H., Potschin M.P., The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In: Raffaelli, D., Frid, C. (Eds.), Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis. Cambridge University Press, 2010. Google Scholar

  • [44] Maes J., Egoh B., Willemen L., Liquete C., Vihervaara P., Schägner J.P. et al. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosystem Services 2012, 1(1), 31–39. Google Scholar

  • [45] Huberman D., A Gateway to PES: Using Payments for Ecosystem Services for Livelihoods and Landscapes. Markets and Incentives for Livelihoods and Landscapes Series No. 1, Forest Conservation Programme, International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Gland, 2008. Google Scholar

  • [46] Greiber T. (Ed.), Payments for Ecosystem Services. Legal and Institutional Frameworks. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. 2009, 296. Google Scholar

  • [47] Wunder S., Payments for environmental services: Some nuts and bolts, CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 42, Center for International Forestry Research, Jakarta, 2005. Google Scholar

  • [48] Sukhdev P., Policy and management tools for ecosystem services, In: Ecosystem Services Seminar Series, 2011, http:// www.moore.org/ecosystemservicesseminar.html. Google Scholar

  • [49] Izakovičová Z., Babicová D., Špulerová J., Valkovcová Z., Prehľad, popis metód a postupov a algoritmov (vzorcov a ich premenných) kvantifikácie a hodnotenia úžitkov krajinotvornej funkcie lesných a poľnohospodárskych ekosystémov, ÚKE SAV Bratislava. 2008, 44, (in Slovak) Google Scholar

  • [50] Múdry P., Metodika hodnotenia krajinnej zelene a jej uplatnenie v ekologickom hodnotení územia, PhD thesis, VŠLD, Zvolen, 1983, 169, (in Slovak) Google Scholar

  • [51] Ulrychová D., Hodnotenie mimolesnej drevinnej vegetácie v ekosystémoch poľnohospodárskej krajiny, PhD thesis, Prif UK, Bratislava, 1995,80 (in Slovak) Google Scholar

  • [52] Rózová Z., Ecological aspects of greenery projects for rural-type settlements, Ekológia, Bratislava, 1994, 13 (1), 63–75. Google Scholar

  • [53] Sláviková D., Ochrana rozptýlenej zelene v krajine..Metodickonámetová príručka 9, SZOPK Bratislava, 1987, 124 (in Slovak) Google Scholar

  • [54] Sláviková D., Funkčná účinnosť krajinnej zelene v krajinných typoch Slovenska, Správa pre záverečnú oponentúru etapy čiastkovej výskumnej úlohy VI-6-4/04.1, VŠLD Zvolen, 1990, 77 (in Slovak) Google Scholar

  • [55] Míchal I., Praktické rámce hodnocení krajinného rázu I. Typologciké rámce, Ochrana přírody, ročník 1997, 52, 1, 4–10 (in Czech) Google Scholar

  • [56] Míchal, I., Praktické rámce hodnocení krajinného rázu II. Estetické hodnocení, Ochrana přírody, 1997, 52, 2, 35–41 (in Czech) Google Scholar

  • [57] Ruzicka M., Miklos L., Landscape ecological planning (LANDEP) in the process of territorial planning, Ekologia, CSSR, 1982, 1(3), 297–312. Google Scholar

  • [58] Barbier E.B., Acreman M.C., Knowler D., Economic Valuation of Wetlands: A Guide for Policy Makers and Planners. Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland, 1997. Google Scholar

  • [59] Barbier E.B., Valuing ecosystem services as productive inputs. Econ. Policy 2007, 49, 178–229. Google Scholar

  • [60] Phaneuf D.J., Smith V.K., Recreation demand models In: Mäler K., Vincent J., Handbook of Environmental Economics, vol. 2. North-Holland, Amsterdam., 2005. Google Scholar

  • [61] Philip L.J., MacMillan D.C., Exploring values, context and perceptions in contingent valuation studies: The CV market stall technique and willingness to pay for wildlife conservation, J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 2005, 48 (2), 257–274. Google Scholar

  • [62] Wilson M.A., Howarth R.B., Valuation techniques for achieving social fairness in the distribution of ecosystem services, Ecol. Econ., 2002, 41, 431–438. Google Scholar

  • [63] Spash C.L., How much is that ecosystem in the window? The one with the bio-diverse trail, Environ. Values, 2008, 17, 259–284. Google Scholar

  • [64] Aldred J., Jacobs M., Citizens and wetlands: Evaluating the Ely citizen’s jury, Ecol. Econ., 2000, 34, 217–232. Google Scholar

  • [65] Gregory R., Wellman K., Bringing stakeholder values into environmental policy choices: A community-based estuary case study. Ecol. Econ., 2001, 39, 37–52. Google Scholar

  • [66] Clemen R.T., Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis, PWS Kent Publishing, Boston, 1996. Google Scholar

  • [67] Arvai J.L., Gregory R., Testing alternative decision approaches for identifying cleanup priorities at contaminated sites. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2003, 37, 1469–1476. PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [68] Boyd J., What’s nature worth? Using indicators to open the black box of ecological valuation. Resources. Summer 2004 (154). Google Scholar

  • [69] Stoms D.M., Comer P.J., Crist P.J., Grossman D.H., Choosing surrogates for biodiversity conservation in complex planning environments, J. Conserv. Plan., 2005, 1, 26-39. Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2014-02-25

Accepted: 2014-07-25

Published Online: 2014-12-12

Citation Information: Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems, Volume 1, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 2300-3669, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cass-2014-0008.

Export Citation

© 2014 Zuzana Sarvašová et al.. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Jana Špulerová, František Petrovič, Peter Mederly, Matej Mojses, and Zita Izakovičová
Land, 2018, Volume 7, Number 2, Page 74

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in