Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems

Climate Change, Social Changes, Technological Development

Ed. by Fürst, Christine / Geneletti, Davide

1 Issue per year


Emerging Science

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-3669
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Ecosystem services for connecting actors – lessons from a symposium

Paul Opdam
  • Corresponding author
  • Wageningen University Department of Land Use Planning, Alterra, Nature and Society Group, Wageningen, The Netherlands
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Christian Albert
  • Corresponding author
  • Institute of Environmental Planning, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Department Environmental Politics, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Leipzig, Germany
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Christine Fürst
  • Corresponding author
  • Center for Development Research (ZEF), Department of Ecology and Natural Resources Management, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Adrienne Grêt-Regamey
  • Corresponding author
  • ETH Zürich, Planning of Landscape and Urban Systems (PLUS), Institut für Raum- und Landschaftsentwicklung (IRL), Zürich, Switzerland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Janina Kleemann
  • Corresponding author
  • Center for Development Research (ZEF), Department of Ecology and Natural Resources Management, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Dawn Parker / Daniele La Rosa / Katja Schmidt
  • Corresponding author
  • Universität Potsdam, Institut für Erd- und Umweltwissenschaften, Potsdam-Golm, Germany
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Grace B. Villamor
  • Corresponding author
  • Center for Development Research (ZEF), Department of Ecology and Natural Resources Management, University of Bonn, Germany
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Ariane Walz
  • Corresponding author
  • Wageningen University Department of Land Use Planning, Alterra, Nature and Society Group, Wageningen, The Netherlands
  • Institute of Earth and Environmental Science, Potsdam University, Potsdam, Germany
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-06-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cass-2015-0001

Abstract

This paper is a communication from the corresponding symposium at the Global Land Project Open Science Meeting, Berlin, March 2014. We explored the assumption that the ecosystem services-(ES) concept has the potential to support communication and collaboration between actors in land use planning. If true, the concept could facilitate collaborative planning processes. We analyse how to evolve a planning context in which governance networks at the local landscape level gain importance in decision making, while the central government delegates power. From case studies presented during the symposium we learned that the ES-concept has been explored for application in local land use planning around the world. However, whether ES are recognized as a useful planning concept depends on individual actor preferences and cultural and contextual factors, such as the actual nature-human relationship and gender differences. Also, successful application requires the support of novel assessment, design and visualization tools, which are designed to foster collaboration and social learning. The potential of the concept to contribute to collaborative relationships needs further investigation.

Keywords : Local land use planning; community-based learning; governance networks; market mechanism; individual and cultural variation; perception of value

References

  • [1] Hauck J., Schweppe-Kraft B., Albert C., Görg C., Jax K., Jensen R., et al., The Promise of the Ecosystem Services-concept for Planning and Decision-Making, GAIA, 2013, 22, 232-236 Google Scholar

  • [2] Hermann A., Schleifer S., Wrbka T., The concept of ecosystem services regarding landscape research: a review, Living Rev. Landscape Res., 2011, 5, 1-37 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [3] Termorshuizen J., Opdam P., Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development, Landsc. Ecol., 2009, 24, 1037-1052 Google Scholar

  • [4] Daily G.C., Polasky S., Goldstein J., Kareiva P.M., Mooney H.A., Pejchar L., et al., Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver, Front. Ecol. Environ., 2009, 7, 21-28 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5] Opdam P., Using ecosystem services in community based planning: science is not ready to deliver, In: Fu B., Jones B. K. (Eds.), Landscape Ecology for Sustainable Environment and Culture, Springer Verlag, 2013 Google Scholar

  • [6] Ruckelshaus M., McKenzie E., Tallis H., Guerry. A., Daily G., Kareiva P., et al., Notes from the field: Lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real world decisions, Ecol. Econ., 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolecon.2013.07.009 CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [7] von Haaren C., Albert C., Integrating Ecosystem Services and Environmental Planning: Limitations and Synergies, International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 2011, 7, 150-167 Google Scholar

  • [8] Portman M.E., Ecosystem services in practice: Challenges to real world implementation of ecosystem services across multiple landscapes – A critical review, Appl. Geogr., 2013, 45, 185-192 Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [9] Fürst, C., Pietzsch, K., Frank, S., Witt, A., Koschke, L., Makeschin F., How to better consider sectorial planning information in regional planning - example afforestation and conversion, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2012, 55, 1-29 Google Scholar

  • [10] Albert C., Hauck J., Buhr N., von Haaren C., What ecosystem services information do users want? Investigating interests and requirements among landscape and regional planners in Germany, Landsc. Ecol., 2014, 29, 1301-1313 Google Scholar

  • [11] Cowell R., Lennon M., The utilisation of environmental knowledge in land-use planning: drawing lessons for an ecosystem services approach, Environ. Plann. C Gov. Policy, 2014, 32, 263-282, DOI: 10.1068/c12289j CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [12] Opdam P., Incorporating multiple ecological scales into the governance of landscape services, In: Padt F., Opdam P., Polman N., Termeer C., (Eds.), Scale-Sensitive Governance of the Environment, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK, 2014 Google Scholar

  • [13] Frank S., Fürst C., Witt A., Koschke L., Makeschin F., Making use of the ecosystem services-concept in regional planning— trade-offs from reducing water erosion, Landsc. Ecol., 2014, 29, 1377-1391, DOI: 10.1007/s10980-014-9992-3 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [14] Fürst C., Frank S., Witt A., Koschke L., Makeschin, F., Assessment of the effects of forest land use strategies on the provision of Ecosystem Services at regional scale, J. Environ. Manage., 2013, 127, 96-116 CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [15] Seppelt R., Lautenbach S., Volk M., Identifying trade-offs between ecosystem services, land use, and biodiversity: a plea for combining scenario analysis and optimization on different spatial scales, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 2013, 5, 458-463 Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [16] Armitage D.R., Plummer R., Berkes F., Arthur R.I., Charles A.T., Davidson-Hunt I.J., et al., Adaptive co-management for social– ecological complexity, Front. Ecol. Environ., 2009, 7, 95–102 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [17] Opdam P., Nassauer J., Wang Z., Albert C., Bentrup G., Castella J-C., et al., Science for action at the local landscape scale, Landsc. Ecol., 2013, 28, 1439-1445 Google Scholar

  • [18] Helming K., Diehl K., Geneletti D., Wiggering H., Mainstreaming ecosystem services in European policy impact assessment, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 2013, 40, 82-87 Google Scholar

  • [19] Waylen K.A., Young J., Expectations and experiences of diverse forms of knowledge use: the case of the UK National Ecosystem Assessment, Environ. Plann. C Gov. Policy, 2014, 32, 229-246 Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [20] Newell P., Pattberg P., Schroeder H., Multi-actor governance and the environment, Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 2012, 37, 365-387 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [21] Newig J., Koontz T. M., Multi-level governance, policy implementation and participation: the EU’s mandated participatory planning approach to implementing environmental policy, Journal of European Public Policy, 2014, 21, 248-267 Google Scholar

  • [22] Lane M. B., McDonald G., Community-based Environmental Planning: Operational Dilemmas, Planning Principles and Possible Remedies, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2005, 48, 709-731 Google Scholar

  • [23] Berkes F., Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning, J. Environ. Manage., 2009, 90, 1692-1702 CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [24] Fürst C., Opdam P., Inostroza L., Luque S., A balance score card tool for assessing how successful the ecosystem services concept is applied in participatory land use planning, Special Issue: Integrating Ecosystem Services in Land use planning and Decision-Making Practice, Landsc. Ecol., 2014, 29, 1435-1446 Google Scholar

  • [25] Martinico F., La Rosa D., Privitera R., Green Oriented Urban Development for urban ecosystem services provision in a medium sized city in Southern Italy, iForest, 2014, 7, 385-395, http://dx.doi.org/10.3832/ifor1171-007 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [26] Villamor G.B., van Noordwijk M., Djanibekov U., Chiong-Javier M.E., Catacutan D., Gender differences in land-use decisions: shaping multifunctional landscapes?, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 2014, 6, 128-133 CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [27] Albert C., Aronson J., Fürst C., Opdam P., Integrating ecosystem services in landscape planning: requirements, approaches, and impacts, Landsc. Ecol., 2014, 29, 1277-1285 Google Scholar

  • [28] von Haaren C., Albert C., Barkmann J., de Groot R.S., Spangenberg J., Schröter-Schlaack C., et al., From Explanation to Application: Introducing a Practice-Oriented Ecosystem Services Evaluation (PRESET) Model Adapted to the Context of Landscape Planning and Management, Landsc. Ecol., 2014, 29, 1335-1346 Google Scholar

  • [29] Chan K. M. A., Guerry A. D., Balvanera P., Klain S., Satterfield T., Basurto X., et al., Where are Cultural and Social in Ecosystem Services? A Framework for Constructive Engagement, Bioscience, 2012, 62, 744-756 Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [30] Daniel C.D., Muhar A., Arnberger A., Aznar O., Boyd J.W., Chan K.M.A., et al., Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem service agenda, PNAS, 2012, 109, 8812-8819 Google Scholar

  • [31] Hernández-Morcillo M., Plieninger T., Bieling C., An empirical review of cultural ecosystem service indicators, Ecol. Indic., 2013, 29, 434-444 Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [32] Liu J., Opdam P., Valuing ecosystem services in communitybased landscape planning: introducing a wellbeing-based approach. Special Issue Integrating Ecosystem Services in Land use planning and Decision-Making Practice, Landsc. Ecol., 2014, 29, 1347-1360 Google Scholar

  • [33] Grêt-Regamey A., Burlando P., Girot Ch., Lin E. S., Shaad D., Vollmer D., Digital methods and collaborative platforms for informing design values with science, In: Wissen Hayek U., Fricker P., Buhmann E. (Eds.), Peer Reviewed Proceedings of Digital Landscape Architecture Conference 2014 at ETH Zurich, (21-23 May, 2014, Zurich, Switzerland), Herbert Wichmann Verlag, VDE VERLAG GMBH, Berlin/Offenbach, 2014, 46-56 Google Scholar

  • [34] Star S.L., This is not a boundary object: reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology and Human Values, 2010, 35, 601-617 Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [35] Abson D. J., von Wehrden H., Baumgärtner S., Fischer J., Hanspach J., Härdtle W., et al., Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability, Ecol. Econ., 2014, 103, 29-37 Google Scholar

  • [36] Opdam P., Westerik J., Vos C., De Vries B., The role and Evolution of Boundary concepts in transdisciplinary landscape planning, Planning Theory and Practice, 2015, 16, 63-78 Google Scholar

  • [37] Grêt-Regamey A., Celio E., Klein T.M., Wissen Hayek U., Understanding ecosystem services trade-offs with interactive procedural modeling for sustainable urban planning, Landsc. Urban. Plan., 2013, 109, 107-116 Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2014-05-08

Accepted: 2015-02-02

Published Online: 2015-06-01


Citation Information: Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems, ISSN (Online) 2300-3669, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cass-2015-0001.

Export Citation

© 2015 Paul Opdam et al.. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Matthias Bürgi, Panna Ali, Afroza Chowdhury, Andreas Heinimann, Cornelia Hett, Felix Kienast, Manoranjan Kumar Mondal, Bishnu Raj Upreti, and Peter H. Verburg
Sustainability, 2017, Volume 9, Number 8, Page 1371
[2]
Matthias Schröter, Christian Albert, Alexandra Marques, Wolke Tobon, Sandra Lavorel, Joachim Maes, Claire Brown, Stefan Klotz, and Aletta Bonn
BioScience, 2016, Page biw101

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in