Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access December 29, 2017

Mapping landscape units in Galicia (Spain): A first step for assessment and management?

  • Eduardo Corbelle-Rico EMAIL logo and José María Tubío Sánchez

Abstract

In the beginning of 2015, the Regional Administration of Galicia (NW Spain) set the requirements for a map of landscape units: it had to be produced in less than 3 months, it should cover the whole territory of the region (29,574 km²), and it should be useful for management at a scale of 1:25,000. With these objectives in mind, we pro- posed a semiautomatic mapping methodology entirely based on the use of free software (GRASS GIS) and already available cartographic information. Semi-automatic classification of different land-use patterns was at the heart of the proposed process. Consultation with experts of different academic background took place along the project. This consultation process allowed to identify both problems and opportunities. As it could be expected, the diverse epistemic community represented by the expert panel implied that one of the main challenges was to reach consensus on the understanding of the concept of landscape and the decisions leading to the mapping methodology proposed in this paper. This initiated a very interesting debate that, in our view, was centred around three main issues: the approach to the landscape, the purpose of the mapping exercise, and the ability to include subjectivity into the analysis.

References

[1] Corbelle Rico, E., Crecente Maseda, R., Urbanización, forestación e abandono. Cambios recentes na paisaxe de Galicia, 1985-2005, Revista Galega de Economía, 2014, 23, 35-5210.15304/rge.23.1.2445Search in Google Scholar

[2] Brown, G., Brabyn, L., An analysis of the relationships between multiple values and physical landscapes at a regional scale using public participation GIS and landscape character classification, Landscape and Urban Planning, 2012, 107, 317-33110.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.007Search in Google Scholar

[3] Capotorti, G., Guida, D., Siervo, V., Smiraglia, D., Blasi, C., Ecological classification of land and conservation of biodiversity at the national level: The case of Italy, Biological Conservation, 2012, 147, 174-18310.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.028Search in Google Scholar

[4] Chuman, R., Romportl, D., Multivariate classification analysis of cultural landscapes: An example from the Czech Republic, Landscape and Urban Planning, 2010, 98, 200-20910.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.003Search in Google Scholar

[5] Kienast, F., Frick, J., van Strien, M.J., Hunziker, M., The Swiss Landscape Monitoring Program - A comprehensive indicator set to measure landscape change, Ecological Modelling, 2015, 295, 136-15010.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.008Search in Google Scholar

[6] The Countryside Agency and Scottish Natural Heritage, Landscape Character Assessment. Guidance for England and Scotland, 2002Search in Google Scholar

[7] Wascher, D.M. (Ed.), European Landscape Character Areas. Typologies, Cartography and Indicators for the Assessment of Sustainable Landscapes, Final Project Report as deliverable from the EU’s Accompanying Measure project European Landscape Character Assessment Initiative (ELCAI), Landscape Europe, 2005Search in Google Scholar

[8] Mücher, C.A., Klijn, J.A., Wascher, D.M., Schaminée, J.H., A new European Landscape Classification (LANMAP): A transparent, flexible and user-oriented methodology to distinguish landscapes, Ecological Indicators, 2010, 10, 87-10310.1016/j.ecolind.2009.03.018Search in Google Scholar

[9] Jasiewicz, J., Netzel, P., Stepinski, T.F., Landscape similarity, retrieval, and machine mapping of physiographic units, Geomorphology, 2014, 221, 104-11210.1016/j.geomorph.2014.06.011Search in Google Scholar

[10] Soto, S., Pintó, J., Delineation of natural landscape units for Puerto Rico, Applied Geography, 2010, 30, 720-73010.1016/j.apgeog.2010.01.010Search in Google Scholar

[11] van Eetvelde, V., Antrop, M., A stepwise multi-scaled landscape typology and characterisation for trans-regional integration, applied on the federal state of Belgium, Landscape and Urban Planning, 2009, 91, 160-17010.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.12.008Search in Google Scholar

[12] Vallés, M., Galiana, F., Bru, R., Towards Harmonisation in Landscape Unit Delineation: An Analysis of Spanish Case Studies, Landscape Research, 2013, 38, 329-34610.1080/01426397.2011.647896Search in Google Scholar

[13] GRASS Development Team, Geographic Resources Analysis Support System (GRASS) Software, Version 7.0. Open Source Geospatial Foundation. USA, 2015Search in Google Scholar

[14] Jasiewicz, J., Netzel, P., Stepinski, T., GeoPAT: A toolbox for pattern-based information retrieval from large geospatial databases, Computers & Geosciences, 2015, 80, 62-7310.1016/j.cageo.2015.04.002Search in Google Scholar

[15] Goodman, S.N., Fanelli, D., Loannidis, J.P., What does research reproducibility mean?, Science Translational Medicine, 2016, 8, 1210.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027Search in Google Scholar

[16] Nosek, B.A. et al., Promoting an open research culture, Science, 2015, 348, 1422-142510.1126/science.aab2374Search in Google Scholar

[17] Dirección Xeral de Conservación da Natureza, Plan Director da Rede Natura 2000 de Galicia. Anexo VII. Xeorreferenciación e valoración dos compoñentes da biodiversidade. Consellería de Medio Rural, Xunta de Galicia, 2011Search in Google Scholar

[18] Rodríguez Guitián, M.A., Ramil Rego, P., Clasificaciones climáticas aplicadas a Galicia: revisión desde una perspectiva biogeográfica, Recursos Rurais, 2007, 3, 31-5310.15304/rr.id5318Search in Google Scholar

[19] Ramil Rego, P., Rodríguez Guitián, M.A., Rubinos Román, M., Ferreiro da Costa, J., Hinojo Sánchez, B., Blanco López, J.M. et al., La expresión territorial de la biodiversidad. Paisajes y hábitats, Recursos Rurais, 2005, 2, 109-128Search in Google Scholar

[20] Forman, R.T.T., Godron, M., Landscape ecology, John Wiley & Sons, 1986Search in Google Scholar

[21] Cha, S., Comprehensive Survey on Distance/Similarity Measures between Probability Density Functions, International Journal of Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 2007, 1, 300-307Search in Google Scholar

[22] Tress, B., Tress, G., Décamps, H., d’Hauteserre, A.M., Bridging human and natural sciences in landscape research, Landscape and Urban Planning, 2001, 57, 137-14110.1016/S0169-2046(01)00199-2Search in Google Scholar

[23] Price, C., Subjectivity and objectivity in landscape evaluation: an old topic revisited. The economic value of landscape, New York: Routledge, 2012Search in Google Scholar

[24] Antrop, M., A brief history of landscape research, In: Howard, P., Thompson, I., Waterton, E., Atha, M. (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Landscape Studies, London: Routledge, 2013Search in Google Scholar

[25] Tress, G., Tress, B., Fry, G., Analysis of the barriers to integration in landscape research projects, Land Use Policy, 2007, 24, 374-38510.1016/j.landusepol.2006.05.001Search in Google Scholar

[26] Meijers, E., Stead, D., Policy integration: what does it mean and how can it be achieved? A multi-disciplinary review, Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change: Greening of Policies-Interlinkages and Policy Integration, Berlin, 2004Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-11-25
Accepted: 2017-9-5
Published Online: 2017-12-29
Published in Print: 2017-12-20

© 2018

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Downloaded on 29.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cass-2017-0008/html
Scroll to top button