Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Payne, Deborah A. / Schlattmann, Peter / Tate, Jillian R.


IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 3.017
Rank 5 out of 30 in category Medical Laboratory Technology in the 2014 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.873
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.982
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 2.238

Online
ISSN
1437-4331
See all formats and pricing

 


Select Volume and Issue

Issues

Long-Term Variability of Serum Lipoprotein(a) Concentrations in Healthy Fertile Women

Roselyne Garnotel / Frédérique Monier / Fabrice Lefèvre / Philippe Gillery

Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages 317–321, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.1998.053, June 2005

Publication History

Published Online:
2005-06-01

Abstract

Lipoprotein(a) is a unique lipoprotein with atherothrombogenic properties. Although its blood concentration is mainly genetically determined, various factors exist which may cause variability. These may influence the clinical use of the results. We studied lipoprotein(a) biological variation by a rate nephelometric assay over a period of two years in a population of healthy fertile women. The study was performed in 12 volunteers, healthy subjects with various lipoprotein( a) concentrations, by monthly determinations during one year and a single determination one year later, together with measurements of total, high density lipoprotein and high density lipoprotein2 cholesterol, triglycerides and apolipoproteins A1 and B. The intra-individual variability of lipoprotein(a) ranged between 4 to 20%, with three subjects showing a coefficient of biological variation higher than 15 %. In absolute terms, the difference between two determinations could represent 0.44 g/l or 50 % of the mean value. This study suggests that physiological lipoprotein( a) variations should be taken into account for clinical purposes, especially in patients in need of thorough risk evaluation.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Rainer Vormittag, Thomas Vukovich, Milena Stain, Stephan Lehr, Erich Minar, and Ingrid Pabinger
Thrombosis Research, 2007, Volume 120, Number 1, Page 15
[2]
J. A. Goudevenos, E. Th. Bairaktari, K. G. Chatzidimou, H. J. Milionis, D. P. Mikhailidis, and M. S. Elisaf
Current Medical Research and Opinion, 2000, Volume 16, Number 4, Page 269
[3]
Darius J. Nazir, Stephen A. Hill, and Matthew J. McQueen
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 1999, Volume 37, Number 1
[4]
Fabrice Lef�vre and Philippe Gillery
Laboratory Robotics and Automation, 2000, Volume 12, Number 1, Page 23

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.