Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)
Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario
Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Greaves, Ronda / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Payne, Deborah A. / Schlattmann, Peter
IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 3.638
CiteScore 2018: 2.44
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 1.191
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.205
Clinical Experiences with a New Semi-Quantitative Solid Phase Immunoassay for Rapid Measurement of Procalcitonin
A self-developing solid-phase immunoassay (B.R.A.H.M.S. PCT-Q, B.R.A.H.M.S.-Diagnostica GmbH, Hennigsdorf, Germany) has recently become available for the semi-quantitative and rapid measurement of procalcitonin (PCT). In this study we examined the validity of this assay at daily clinical routine conditions at five different hospitals in a prospective study.
After development of the assay (200 μl plasma, 30 minutes incubation), PCT levels were categorized into four groups (< 0.5 μg/l; ≥ 0.5−< 2 μg/l; ≥ 2−< 10 μg/l; ≥ 10 μg/l) according to the provided reference scale. Samples from patients with suspected elevation of PCT of different etiology (n=237) were read by various analyzers and compared with the results of the Lumitest® PCT (B.R.A.H.M.S.-Diagnostica GmbH, Hennigsdorf, Germany).
A total of 74.7% of measurements were categorized according to the results of the Lumitest®PCT, 24.5% were read within the next lower or higher category. Using a ± 10% range at the reference concentrations (20% at 0.5 μg/l), 82.7% of samples were correctly categorized and 16.4% within the next categories. Using a cut-off value of 2.0 μg/l, 92.0% (94.1% for ± 10%) of the results were correctly categorized.
The semi-quantitative solid phase immunoassay allows a rapid, simple and semi-quantitative measurement of plasma PCT. The validity of the test results and its ease of use are sufficient to support acute diagnostic decisions. However, for the follow-up of PCT concentrations and routine daily measurements, the quantitative luminometric assay should be preferred, when available.
Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.