Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Greaves, Ronda / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Payne, Deborah A. / Schlattmann, Peter


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 3.638

CiteScore 2018: 2.44

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 1.191
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.205

Online
ISSN
1437-4331
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 38, Issue 3

Issues

Determination of Reticulocytes: Three Methods Compared

Rüdiger Siekmeier / Alexa Bierlich / Werner Jaroß
Published Online: 2005-06-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2000.036

Abstract

Determination of reticulocytes in peripheral blood is a valuable tool for getting information about erythropoiesis of an individual. For many years, reticulocyte numbers were quantified manually by means of a microscope after staining with supravital dyes. However, this method is tedious and shows low reproducibility. Therefore, several methods for the automated determination of reticulocytes have been established in laboratory routine within the last years. The aim of this study was to compare three of these automated methods for reticulocyte analysis. Reticulocytes were determined in 130 subsequent routine samples by means of an ABX Pentra 120 Retic haematological analyser, a Coulter EPICS XL MCL flow cytometer and a Coulter STKS haematology system, using the fluorescent dye thiazole orange or the supravital dye new methylene blue for reticulocyte staining, respectively. The reticulocyte concentrations were slightly lower for the Coulter STKS haematology system (mean ± SD 1.89 ± 1.32%) when compared with the Coulter EPICS XL MCL flow cytometer or the ABX Pentra 120 Retic haematological analyser (2.11 ± 1.25% and 2.12 ± 1.15%, respectively). The correlations between all methods were significant (rs ≥ 0.843, p < 0.001). Small intercepts were, however, observed in the correlation plots between the values obtained by means of the Coulter STKS haematology system and those obtained by the other two methods. Within-batch coefficients of variation were 6.0%, 6.9% and 7.8% for the ABX Pentra 120 Retic haematological analyser, the Coulter STKS haematology system and the Coulter EPICS XL MCL flow cytometer, respectively. The corresponding between-batch coefficient of variation values were 6.8%, 4.9% and 5.3% as well as 14.1%, 7.6% and 6.1% for the low, medium and high control levels determined by means of the ABX Pentra 120 Retic haematological analyser and the Coulter STKS haematology system, respectively. These data suggest that all three methods allow the efficient and reliable determination of reticulocyte counts under clinical routine conditions. However, although the obtained data are very similar, differences exist which should be taken into account for the normal values of the different methods.

About the article

Published Online: 2005-06-01

Published in Print: 2000-03-25


Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages 245–249, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2000.036.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Elisa Piva, Carlo Brugnara, Federica Spolaore, and Mario Plebani
Clinics in Laboratory Medicine, 2015, Volume 35, Number 1, Page 133
[2]
Joseph M. Rifkind and Enika Nagababu
Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, 2013, Volume 18, Number 17, Page 2274
[3]
Ana Rodrigues, Carlos Ortega, Luís Santos, Alexandre Teixeira, Maria Joáo Dinis, Iponina Vasconcelos, Jorge Lacerda, and Elisa Fonseca
Laboratory Hematology, 2007, Volume 13, Number 3, Page 85
[4]
[5]
Elisa Piva, Carlo Brugnara, Lino Chiandetti, and Mario Plebani
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 2010, Volume 48, Number 10
[6]
David P. Steensma, Julie C. Porcher, Curtis A. Hanson, Cynthia L. Lathrop, James D. Hoyer, Terra A. Lasho, Ayalew Tefferi, and Douglas R. Higgs
British Journal of Haematology, 2007, Volume 139, Number 3, Page 439
[7]
Satoko KAKIUCHI, Mitsuru KOBAYSHI, Yoshihide SATOMI, Daishiro MIURA, Yoshinori KASAHARA, and Shiro KONDO
The Journal of Toxicological Sciences, 2006, Volume 31, Number 2, Page 111
[8]
K. IVORY, B. SARRIA, S. J. FAIRWEATHER-TAIT, and D. A. HUGHES
International Journal of Laboratory Hematology, 2007, Volume 29, Number 5, Page 352
[9]
Andrey Skripchenko, Stephen J. Wagner, Dedeene Thompson-Montgomery, and Helen Awatefe
Transfusion, 2006, Volume 46, Number 2, Page 213
[11]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, 2006, Volume 49, Number 8, Page 833
[12]
J. Van Den Bossche, K. Devreese, R. Malfait, M. Van De Vyvere, and P. De Schouwer
Clinical and Laboratory Haematology, 2001, Volume 23, Number 6, Page 355

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in