Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter June 1, 2005

Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes, Polymorphisms and Interindividual Response to Environmental Toxicants

  • Daniel W. Nebert

Abstract

Individual risk of toxicity or cancer reflects the amount of exposure to environmental agents, combined with one's underlying genetic predisposition. More than six dozen human ecogenetic polymorphisms have been described; whereas some of these have been demonstrated to be associated with altered risks of toxicity or cancer, others presently remain equivocal and require further study. Thus, genetic differences in the regulation, expression and activity of “environmental susceptibility genes” can be decisive in defining susceptibility to toxicity or cancer.

“Drug-metabolizing enzymes” (DMEs) are regarded as one class of environmental susceptibility genes. DME genes have actually existed on this planet for more than 2.5 billion years, and might more appropriately be named “effector-metabolizing enzymes.” Receptors controlling DME levels have been called “DME receptors.” DMEs have functioned in many critical life processes in prokaryotes and, more recently, in countless basic functions in plants and animals—events that evolved long before the existence of pharmaceutical companies and apothecaries. DME genes exist in every eukaryotic cell and probably in all prokaryotes. Virtually all environmental agents act as either agonists or antagonists—in competing with endogenous ligands that bind to DME receptors and/or competing as substrates for the DMEs. Over the past decade it has become clear that each of us has our own “individual fingerprint” of unique alleles coding for DMEs. The underlying genetic predisposition of each patient will reflect combinations of poor- and extensive-metabolizer phenotypes; if these enzymes cooperate in the same metabolic pathway for any given drug or environmental agent, such ecogenetic variability might be synergistic and lead to as much as 30- or >40-fold differences in activation or degradation. The end result can be large interindividual differences in risk of environmentally caused toxicity or cancer.

:
Published Online: 2005-06-01
Published in Print: 2000-09-18

Copyright © 2000 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG

Downloaded on 28.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.2000.124/html
Scroll to top button