Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Greaves, Ronda / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Payne, Deborah A. / Schlattmann, Peter


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 3.556

CiteScore 2017: 2.34

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 1.114
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.188

Online
ISSN
1437-4331
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 39, Issue 3

Issues

Analytical Performance of a Direct Assay for LDL-Cholesterol

Eva M.L. Smets / Nathalie C.V. Péquériaux / Victor Blaton / Henk M.J. Goldschmidt
Published Online: 2005-06-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2001.042

Abstract

We evaluated a direct assay for the determination of LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) L-Type assay, Wako Pure Chemicals in two laboratories. This assay is applicable to most random access clinical chemistry analyzers, allowing full automation.

Between-run coefficient of variation (NCCLS EP5) varied between 1.29 % and 3.13 % and thus met the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) goal. The assay was considered linear over a physiologically relevant range of LDL-C, 2.22 to 7.04 mmol/l (NCCLS EP6).

Method comparison yielded identical results at both evaluation sites for LDL-C when assayed with the direct method. LDL-C results obtained with the homogeneous method under investigation (y) differed significantly from values from density-gradient ultracentrifugation (x) according to Chung (y = 0.87x + 0.43 mmol/l, syx = 0.38 mmol/l, r = 0.91). With the latter method as a reference method, mean bias was 3.16 % meeting the NCEP criteria. Diagnostic performance was excellent at a clinically relevant cut-off level of 3.37 mmol/l. Results of the direct method (y) and the commonly used Friedewald formula (x) were highly correlated (syx = 0.22 mmol/l, r = 0.97), but both slope and intercept differed significantly from one and zero respectively (y = 0.90x + 0.37 mmol/l).

Bilirubin, hemolysis and ascorbate did not interfere; triglycerides did not cause clinically relevant interference below 11.3 mmol/l.

The direct method we investigated is user-friendly and provides an improvement in the determination of LDL-C in routine laboratories.

About the article

Published Online: 2005-06-01

Published in Print: 2001-04-09


Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages 270–280, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2001.042.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Teri L Hernandez, Julie P Sutherland, Pamela Wolfe, Marybeth Allian-Sauer, Warren H Capell, Natalie D Talley, Holly R Wyatt, Gary D Foster, James O Hill, and Robert H Eckel
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2010, Volume 91, Number 3, Page 578
[2]
Eleni T. Bairaktari, Konstantin I. Seferiadis, and Moses S. Elisaf
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2005, Volume 10, Number 1, Page 45
[3]
So-Young Lee, Sang-Keun Hahm, Jin-A Park, Sung-Kyu Choi, Ji-Young Yoon, Seon-Hee Choi, and Kyoung-So Jeon
Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 2015, Volume 36, Number 4, Page 168

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in