Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Payne, Deborah A. / Schlattmann, Peter / Tate, Jillian R.


IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 3.017
Rank 5 out of 30 in category Medical Laboratory Technology in the 2014 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.873
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.982
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 2.238

249,00 € / $374.00 / £187.00*

Online
ISSN
1437-4331
See all formats and pricing

 


Select Volume and Issue

Issues

30,00 € / $42.00 / £23.00

Get Access to Full Text

Assay Using Succinyldithiocholine as Substrate: The Method of Choice for the Measurement of Cholinesterase Catalytic Activity in Serum to Diagnose Succinyldicholine Sensitivity

Andrea Mosca / Roberto Bonora / Ferruccio Ceriotti / Carlo Franzini / Giuliana Lando / Maria Cristina Patrosso / Martina Zaninotto / Mauro Panteghini

Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages 317–322, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2003.051, June 2005

Publication History

Published Online:
2005-06-01

Abstract

No comparative information is available concerning the ability of various cholinesterase (ChE) methods to identify succinyldicholine-sensitive patients, purely on the basis of the enzyme activity recorded in serum. Here, we evaluated six different methods for the measurement of ChE activity; 131 subjects were subdivided according to ChE phenotype and, therefore, to succinyldicholine sensitivity. ChE phenotype was determined by measuring dibucaine and fluoride numbers. DNA analysis was also performed to confirm correlation between the phenotype classification used in the study and the ChE genotype. The tested methods were significantly different in their ability to discriminate between the subjects with and without succinyldicholine-sensitive phenotypes. The succinyldithiocholine/5,5′-dithio-bis(2-nitrobenzoate) (DTNB) method showed the highest accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve 0.97) followed by the propionylthiocholine/DTNB method (area under the ROC curve 0.94). On the other hand, the two methods using butyrylthiocholine as substrate and that employing benzoylcholine showed limited clinical utility in discriminating subjects at risk of prolonged apnea (area under the ROC curve ≤ 0.9). Using the succinyldithiocholine method, a value ≤ 23 U/l was approximately five times as likely to occur in a sensitive individual as in a normal one.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Linus T.-H. Kao and Miklós Gratzl
Analytical Biochemistry, 2009, Volume 389, Number 2, Page 93
[2]
Bo-Chuan Hsieh, Hsien-Yi Hsiao, Tzong-Jih Cheng, and Richie L.C. Chen
Analytica Chimica Acta, 2008, Volume 623, Number 2, Page 157
[3]
Andrea Mosca, Ferruccio Ceriotti, Carlo Franzini, and Mauro Panteghini
Clinical Chemical Laboratory Medicine, 2005, Volume 43, Number 2

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.