Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Payne, Deborah A. / Schlattmann, Peter / Tate, Jillian R.

12 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 3.017
Rank 5 out of 30 in category Medical Laboratory Technology in the 2014 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.873
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.982
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 2.238

See all formats and pricing
Volume 42, Issue 4 (Apr 2004)


Automated flagging influences the inconsistency and bias of band cell and atypical lymphocyte morphological differentials

Wim van der Meer / Colin Stephen Scott / MarinusH. de Keijzer
Published Online: 2005-06-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2004.066


This study evaluated inter- and intra-observer variabilities of band cell and atypical lymphocyte differentials and the influence of instrument flagging information on resulting microscopic differentials. Five stained slides with a range of band cell counts and five with variable numbers of atypical lymphocytes were sent for morphological review by 30 technicians. No supplementary full blood cell count information was provided. Two months later, the same slides were sent, together with their corresponding analyzer reports comprising the full blood cell count, automated differentials and flags, to the same technicians. The first and second appraisals of band cells and variant lymphocytes both showed poor levels of inter-observer consistency. Observed values for all slides were very wide and suggested a high inherent predisposition to erroneous reporting practices. Analysis of category trends showed that analyzer left shift or immature granulocytes flags had no influence on observer band cell assessments as downward vs. upward category revisions were evenly balanced. The findings for atypical lymphocytes were, however, somewhat different. Two slides with no flags both showed balanced category revisions, whereas two of the three slides with atypical lymphocyte flags showed clear evidence of upward category revision. The third slide with an atypical lymphocyte flag did not show any overall category trend, but six of the seven observers who in the first examination recorded atypical lymphocyte estimates of ≤30% revised their estimates upward when the slides were examined the second time. These results suggest that morphologist access to an analyzer report and flagging information is unlikely to affect the “randomness” of band cell determinations but it may induce observer bias in variant lymphocyte estimates.

About the article

Published Online: 2005-06-01

Published in Print: 2004-04-05

Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), ISSN (Online) 1437-4331, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2004.066. Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

E. Rabizadeh, I. Pickholtz, M. Barak, E. Isakov, Y. Zimra, and P. Froom
International Journal of Laboratory Hematology, 2015, Volume 37, Number 1, Page 44
Busadee Pratumvinit, Preechaya Wongkrajang, Kanit Reesukumal, Cherdsak Klinbua, and Patama Niamjoy
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 2013, Volume 137, Number 3, Page 408
Johannes J. M. L. Hoffmann
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 2004, Volume 42, Number 4
Maria Elena Gelain, Gabriele Rossi, Luca Giori, Stefano Comazzi, and Saverio Paltrinieri
Veterinary Clinical Pathology, 2010, Volume 39, Number 2, Page 169
Wim Meer, Warry Gelder, Ries Keijzer, and Hans Willems
European Journal of Haematology, 2006, Volume 76, Number 3, Page 251
Clinical and Laboratory Haematology, 2005, Volume 27, Number 4, Page 224

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in