Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)
Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario
Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Payne, Deborah A. / Schlattmann, Peter / Tate, Jillian R.
IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 3.017
Rank 5 out of 30 in category Medical Laboratory Technology in the 2014 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.873
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.982
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 2.238
Quality assessment in cytogenetic and molecular genetic testing: the experience of the Italian Project on Standardisation and Quality Assurance
Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Volume 42, Issue 8, Pages 915–921, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2004.148, June 2005
- February 12, 2004
- May 27, 2004
- Published Online:
The first Italian national trial of external quality assessment in genetic testing was organised within the framework of the “Italian National Project for Standardisation and Quality Assurance of Genetic Tests”. Sixty-eight Public Health Service laboratories volunteered for the trial, which involved molecular genetic tests (cystic fibrosis, β-thalassaemia, familial adenomatous polyposis coli and fragile-X syndrome) and cytogenetic tests (prenatal and postnatal, the latter included cancer cytogenetics). The response rate was high (88.2%). The level of analytical accuracy was good, i.e., the percentage of laboratories that correctly genotyped all samples was 89.3% for cystic fibrosis, 90.9% for β-thalassaemia, 100% for familial adenomatous polyposis coli (despite two laboratories did not complete the analysis because the amount of DNA was considered insufficient), and 90.5% for fragile-X syndrome. Written reports differed widely and were judged “inadequate” in over 50% of cases. Most laboratories from the present study already have experience in previous European external quality assessments for at least one genetic test; this can explain the higher analytical accuracy in the Italian external quality assessment with respect to quality control programmes in other countries. Collaborative networks are strongly suggested to improve the quality of the reports.
Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.