Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Greaves, Ronda / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Payne, Deborah A. / Schlattmann, Peter

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 3.556

CiteScore 2017: 2.34

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 1.114
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.188

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 44, Issue 6


Clinical Governance and evidence-based laboratory medicine

Tommaso Trenti
  • Patologia Clinica, Tossicologia e Diagnostica Avanzata, Ospedale Nuovo Sant'Agostino Estense, Dipartimento di Patologia Clinica, Modena, Italy
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Claudia Canali
  • Patologia Clinica, Tossicologia e Diagnostica Avanzata, Ospedale Nuovo Sant'Agostino Estense, Dipartimento di Patologia Clinica, Modena, Italy
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Annamaria Scognamiglio
  • Patologia Clinica, Tossicologia e Diagnostica Avanzata, Ospedale Nuovo Sant'Agostino Estense, Dipartimento di Patologia Clinica, Modena, Italy
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2006-05-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2006.130


Background: Clinical Governance is described as “a framework through which the NHS organisations are accountable to continue to improve the quality of the service and safeguarding high standards of care by creating an environment in which excellence in clinical care would flourish”; it is aimed to ensure continuous improvement in the overall standard of clinical care, ensuring that clinical decisions are based on the most up-to-date evidence in terms of effectiveness.

Methods: If Clinical Governance is a framework through which NHS organisations are accountable to continuously improve the quality of their services and safeguarding high standards of care, Clinical Effectiveness is a vital part of Clinical Governance. Clinical Effectiveness is a term that refers to measuring and monitoring the quality of care, and comprises various activities, including: Evidence-Based Practice, Research and Development, Clinical Audit, Clinical Guidelines, Integrated Care Pathways, and Total Quality Management.

Results: The application of evidence-based medicine (EBM) in laboratory medicine or evidence-based laboratory medicine (EBLM) aims to advance clinical diagnosis by researching and spreading new knowledge, combining methods from clinical epidemiology, statistics and social science with the traditional pathophysiological molecular approach. EBLM, by evaluating the role of diagnostic investigations in the clinical decision-making process, can help in translating the results of good quality research into everyday practice.

Conclusions: If Clinical Governance is a framework through which organisations are accountable to improve the quality of care, health professionals should identify high quality standards, and systematically and rigorously monitor against them the process and outcomes that represent the diagnostic process. Within such a policy framework, practice guidelines are expected to play a major role, providing the basis to access the quality of care and guidance where clinical practice is found not in line with professional standards.

Keywords: clinical audit; Clinical Governance; clinical guidelines; evidence-based laboratory medicine; quality of evidence


  • 1.

    Department of Health. The new NHS: modern, dependable. London: Stationery Office, 1997.Google Scholar

  • 2.

    World Health Organization. The principles of quality assurance (report on a WHO meeting) WHO, 1983.Google Scholar

  • 3.

    Department of Health. A first class service: quality in the new NHS. London: Stationery Office, 1998.Google Scholar

  • 4.

    Donaldson EJ, Gray JA. Clinical Governance – a quality duty for health organizations. Qual Health Care 1998; 7(Suppl):S37–44.Google Scholar

  • 5.

    Grilli R, Donatini A, Taroni F. Healthcare reform and disease management in Italy. Promoting the effectiveness and appropriateness of health service use. Dis Manage Health Outcomes 2001; 9:441–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 6.

    Swage T. Clinical governance in health care practice, 1st ed. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann, 2000.Google Scholar

  • 7.

    Freedman BD. Clinical Governance: the experience in the UK. In: Plebani M, Trenti T, editors. Praticare il Governo Clinico: qualità, efficacia e professionalità in medicina. Torino: Centro Scientifico Editore, 2002:255–72.Google Scholar

  • 8.

    Guyatt G, Cook D, Haynes B. Evidence based medicine has come a long way. Br Med J 2004; 329:990–1.Google Scholar

  • 9.

    Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, Rosemberg W, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone, 2000.Google Scholar

  • 10.

    Haynes RB. Where's the meat in clinical journals? ACP J Club 1993; 119:A23–4.Google Scholar

  • 11.

    Munro J, Booth A, Nicholl J. Routine preoperative testing; a systematic review of evidence. Health Technol Assess 1997; 1(12):i–iv,1–62.Google Scholar

  • 12.

    Gabby J, Walley T. Introducing new health intervention. Br Med J 2006; 332:64–5.Google Scholar

  • 13.

    Gluud C, Gluud LL. Evidence based diagnostics. Br Med J 2005; 330:724–6.Google Scholar

  • 14.

    Barth JH, Seth J, Howlett TA, Freedman DB. A survey of endocrine function testing by clinical biochemistry laboratories in the UK. Ann Clin Biochem 1995; 32:442–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 15.

    van Warlraven C, Naylor CD. Do we know what inappropriate laboratory utilization is? A systematic review of laboratory clinical audits. J Am Med Assoc 1998; 280:550–8.Google Scholar

  • 16.

    Bareford D, Hayling A. Inappropriate use of laboratory service: long-term combined approach to modify request patterns. Br Med J 1990; 301:1305–7.Google Scholar

  • 17.

    Winkens R, Dinant GJ. Evidence base of clinical diagnosis. Rational, cost effective use of investigations in clinical practice. Br Med J 2002; 324:783–5.Google Scholar

  • 18.

    Lundberg GD. How clinicians should use the diagnostic laboratory in changing medical world. Clin Chim Acta 1995; 41:775–80.Google Scholar

  • 19.

    Lundberg GD. The need for an outcomes research agenda for clinical laboratory testing. J Am Med Assoc 1998; 280:565–6.Google Scholar

  • 20.

    Price CP. Evidence-based laboratory medicine: supporting decision making. Clin Chem 2000; 46:1041–50.Google Scholar

  • 21.

    McQueen MJ. Overview of evidence based medicine: challenges for evidence-based laboratory medicine. Clin Chem 2001; 47:1536–46.Google Scholar

  • 22.

    Sackett DL, Rosember WM, Gray JA, Hayes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. Br Med J 1996; 312:71–2.Google Scholar

  • 23.

    http://www.ifcc.org/divisions/emd/c-eblm/definitions.asp (accessed January 2006).Google Scholar

  • 24.

    Berti E, Grilli R. Practice guidelines and clinical governance: do the means match with the ends? A quality appraisal of local practice guidelines. Clin Governance 2003; 8:312–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 25.

    Hurwitz B. Legal and political considerations of clinical practice guidelines. Br Med J 1999; 318:661–4.Google Scholar

  • 26.

    Watine J. Are laboratory investigations recommended in current medical practice guidelines supported by available evidence? Clin Chem Lab Med 2002; 40:252–5.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 27.

    Bruns DE, Oosterhuis WP. From evidence to guidelines. In: Price CP, Christenson RH, editors. Evidence-based laboratory medicine. Washington, DC: AACC Press, 2003:187–208.Google Scholar

  • 28.

    Grimshaw J, Russell I. Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines. I. Developing scientifically valid guidelines. Qual Health Care 1993; 2:243–8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 29.

    Williams JG. Guidelines for clinical guidelines should distinguish between national and local production. Br Med J 1999; 318:942.Google Scholar

  • 30.

    Read MC, Lachs MS, Feinstein AR. Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research: getting better but still not good. J Am Med Assoc 1995; 274:645–51.Google Scholar

  • 31.

    Whiting P, Rujes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3:25 (http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/3/25, accessed January 2006).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 32.

    Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwing LM, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Clin Chem 2003; 49:1–6.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 33.

    van Wijk MA, van der Lei J, Mosseveld M, Bohnen AM, van Bemmel JH. Compliance of general practitioners with a guideline-based decision support system for ordering blood tests. Clin Chem 2002; 48:55–60.Google Scholar

  • 34.

    West S, King V, Carey TS, Lohr KN, McKoy N, Sutton SE, et al. System to rate the strength of scientific evidence. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 47. AHRQ Publication No. 02E016. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2002 (http://ahrq.gov, accessed January 2006).Google Scholar

  • 35.

    AGREE Collaborative Group. Guideline development in Europe: an international comparison. Int J Technol Assess Health Care2000;16:1039–49.Google Scholar

  • 36.

    Oosterhuis WP, Bruns DE, Watine J, Sandberg S, Horvath AR. Evidence-based guidelines in laboratory medicine: principles and methods. Clin Chem 2004; 50:806–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 37.

    www.pnlg.it (accessed January 2006).Google Scholar

  • 38.

    Jefferson T. Criteria for the assessment of evidence on the accuracy of diagnostic and prognostic test [abstract]. Clin Chem Lab Med 2005; 43:A132.Google Scholar

  • 39.

    Granata AV, Hillman AL. Competing practice guidelines: using cost-effectiveness analysis to make optimal decision. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128:56–53.Google Scholar

  • 40.

    McQueen MJ. Evidence based medicine: its application to laboratory medicine. Ther Drug Monit 2000; 22:1–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 41.

    Davies DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Evidence for the effectiveness of CME. A review of 50 randomized controlled trials. J Am Med Assoc 1992; 268:1111–7.Google Scholar

  • 42.

    Burgers JS. Guideline quality and guideline content: are they related? Clin Chem 2006; 52:3–4.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 43.

    Watine J, Freidberg B, Nagy E, Onody R, Oosterhuis W, Bunting PS, et al. Conflict between guidelines methodologic quality and recommendation validity: a potential problem for practitioners. Clin Chem 2006; 52:65–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 44.

    Barth JH. The role of clinical audit. In: Price CP, Christenson RH, editors. Evidence-based laboratory medicine. Washington, DC: AACC Press, 2003:209–24.Google Scholar

  • 45.

    Trenti T. Evidence based laboratory medicine as a tool for continuous professional improvement. Clin Chim Acta 2003; 333:155–67.Google Scholar

  • 46.

    Plebani M. Appropriateness in program for continuous quality improvement in clinical laboratories. Clin Chim Acta 2003; 333:131–9.Google Scholar

  • 47.

    Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshow JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD, Thomson MA. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. Br Med J 1998; 317:465–8.Google Scholar

About the article

Corresponding author: Tommaso Trenti, Patologia Clinica, Tossicologia e Diagnostica Avanzata, Ospedale Nuovo Sant'Agostino Estense, Dipartimento di Patologia Clinica, Ausl di Modena, 41100, Modena, Italy Phone: +39-059-3961467, Fax: +39-0536-29278

Published Online: 2006-05-29

Published in Print: 2006-06-01

Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages 724–732, ISSN (Online) 1437-4331, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2006.130.

Export Citation

©2006 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Mario Plebani
Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences, 2016, Volume 53, Number 3, Page 184
Tommaso Trenti, Holger J. Schünemann, and Mario Plebani
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 2016, Volume 54, Number 4
Nicola Bizzaro, Renato Tozzoli, and Danilo Villalta
Immunologic Research, 2015, Volume 61, Number 1-2, Page 126
Elaheh Hooshmand, Sogand Tourani, Hamid Ravaghi, and Hossein Ibrahimipour
Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 2014, Volume 16, Number 4
Mark R. Wick and Alberto M. Marchevsky
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 2011, Volume 135, Number 11, Page 1398
Giuseppe Lippi, Roberto Fostini, and Gian Cesare Guidi
Clinics in Laboratory Medicine, 2008, Volume 28, Number 2, Page 285
Massimo Brunetti, Silvia Pregno, Holger Schünemann, Mario Plebani, and Tommaso Trenti
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 2011, Volume 49, Number 4
María Concepción Alonso-Cerezo, José Simón Martín, Miguel Angel García Montes, and Verónica Marcos de la Iglesia
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 2009, Volume 47, Number 12

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in