Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Greaves, Ronda / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Payne, Deborah A. / Schlattmann, Peter

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 3.556

CiteScore 2018: 2.44

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 1.191
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.205

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 46, Issue 6


Analytical performance evaluation of the Cobas 6000 analyzer – special emphasis on trueness verification

Adriaan J. van Gammeren / Nelly van Gool / Monique J.M. de Groot / Christa M. Cobbaert


Background: Consolidation of analyzers is an emerging issue in clinical chemistry. We evaluated the analytical performance of the Cobas 6000 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics), which is considered a candidate for replacement of current Hitachi 917 analyzers and for consolidation of chemistry and immunochemistry.

Methods: The precision, accuracy, linearity and correlation with current field methods were evaluated according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute protocols EP5, EP9 and EP10. A total of 31 routine chemistry assays and 18 immunoassays were studied. Accuracy and linearity were verified for 24 chemistry parameters using value-assigned trueness controls from the Dutch External Quality Assessment Scheme organizers. In addition, traceability to methods endorsed by the Joint Committee of Traceability in Laboratory Medicine was examined.

Results: All analytes met allowable precision criteria, apart from the low level for sodium and folate. Total coefficients of variation ranged between 0.6% and 4.4% for routine chemistry and between 0.8% and 5.8% for immunochemistry, apart from folate (12% at the low end). The correlation coefficients for comparison to current field methods were >0.975, except for magnesium and for six out of 18 immunochemistries. Recovery experiments indicated high recovery for most of the 24 routine chemistry assays.

Conclusions: Considering the excellent precision data and the result equivalence for most assays, it can be concluded that Cobas 6000 accommodates robust chemistry and immunochemistry, and has good potential for workstation consolidation in medium-sized laboratories.

Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:863–71.

Keywords: accuracy; Cobas 6000; consolidation; correlation; IVD directive; precision; traceability

About the article

Corresponding author: Adriaan J. van Gammeren, Department of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, Amphia Hospital, Langendijk 75, 4819 EV Breda, The Netherlands Phone: +31-76-5955259, Fax: +31-76-5952092,

Received: 2007-10-15

Accepted: 2008-01-03

Published in Print: 2008-06-01

Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages 863–871, ISSN (Online) 1437-4331, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2008.159.

Export Citation

©2008 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

The Journal of Rheumatology, 2011, Volume 38, Number 4, Page 606
P. Findeisen, I. Zahn, G.M. Fiedler, A.B. Leichtle, S. Wang, G. Soria, P. Johnson, J. Henzell, J.K. Hegel, C. Bendavid, N. Collet, M. McGovern, and K. Klopprogge
Clinical Biochemistry, 2018
Arnold von Eckardstein, Hans Jürgen Roth, Graham Jones, Sharon Preston, Thomas Szekeres, Roland Imdahl, Marc Conti, Norbert Blanckaert, Darren Jose, Joachim Thiery, Lisa Feldmann, Nicolas von Ahsen, Massimo Locatelli, Jenni Kremastinou, Albert Kunst, Arnulf Hubbuch, and Margaret McGovern
Journal of Laboratory Automation, 2013, Volume 18, Number 4, Page 306
A.G. Semb, E. Ikdahl, J. Hisdal, I.C. Olsen, and S. Rollefstad
International Journal of Cardiology, 2016, Volume 223, Page 331
Elvira Verduci, Carlotta Lassandro, Roberta Giacchero, Vito Miniello, Giuseppe Banderali, and Giovanni Radaelli
Nutrients, 2015, Volume 7, Number 12, Page 10089
S Rollefstad, E Ikdahl, J Hisdal, T K Kvien, T R Pedersen, I Holme, and A G Semb
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2015, Volume 74, Number 8, Page 1544
S Skovsø, J Damgaard, J J Fels, G S Olsen, X A Wolf, B Rolin, and J J Holst
International Journal of Obesity, 2015
Youqiang Li, Junhua Zhuang, Xianzhang Huang, Yunyan Zhang, Donglin Lin, Bin Huang, Pinghua Qu, Jianming Zeng, Xuan Zhang, Jianping Liu, Fuzhen Xia, and Cha Chen
Clinical Biochemistry, 2014, Volume 47, Number 12, Page 1078
Silvia Rollefstad, Tore K Kvien, Ingar Holme, Anne S Eirheim, Terje R Pedersen, and Anne Grete P Semb
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2013, Volume 72, Number 12, Page 1968
Alfonso López Rodríguez, Tom Rijsselaere, Josine Beek, Philip Vyt, Ann Van Soom, and Dominiek Maes
Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine, 2013, Volume 59, Number 1, Page 5
Jin-Hee Cho, Chul-Moon Lee, Chul Min Park, Hee-Won Moon, Mina Hur, Yeo-Min Yun, Woochang Lee, Sail Chun, and Won-Ki Min
Laboratory Medicine Online, 2012, Volume 2, Number 3, Page 131
Francisco A. Bernabeu Andreu, M.A. Corcho Robleda, Mauricio Redondo Fernández, Liliana Sivera Monzó, M. Carmen Coca Martín, and Ignacio Arribas Gómez
Revista del Laboratorio Clínico, 2010, Volume 3, Number 2, Page 58
Giampaolo Cattozzo, Chiara Albeni, Alessandra Calonaci, and Giancarlo De Luca
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 2011, Volume 49, Number 9
Bedrich Friedecky, Josef Kratochvila, and Marek Budina
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 2011, Volume 49, Number 4
Gunnar Brandhorst, Hilmar Luthe, Ingrid Domke, Christiane Knoke, Karl-Heinz Rhode, Heike Sauter, and Michael Oellerich
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 2009, Volume 47, Number 7

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in