Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Greaves, Ronda / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Payne, Deborah A. / Schlattmann, Peter


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 3.638

CiteScore 2018: 2.44

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 1.191
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.205

Online
ISSN
1437-4331
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 47, Issue 11

Issues

The rate of manual peripheral blood smear reviews in outpatients

Paul Froom / Rosa Havis / Mira Barak
Published Online: 2009-09-25 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2009.308

Abstract

Background: The International Consensus Group for Hematology Review recommends manual blood smears for new findings from automated complete blood cell (CBC) tests. However, in outpatients, the rate of peripheral manual blood smear reviews is uncertain, as is the effect of historical results on this rate.

Methods: In a prospective cohort study of 687,955 members of a health maintenance organization, we extracted 39,759 consecutive automated CBC test results and determined the rate of manual peripheral smear reviews that were indicated using different triggering criteria, and historical results.

Results: Individual triggering values increased from 10.7% to 19.5% when comparing our criteria to those of the consensus criteria. The proportion of CBC test results with at least one triggering value was 7.2% using our criteria, compared to 13.9% with the inclusion of a mean corpuscular volume <75 and a plus one immature granulocyte flag according to the consensus committee. Availability of historical data decreased our peripheral smear review rate to 2.6%.

Conclusions: The peripheral smear review rate in outpatients using the consensus criteria was higher than with our less stringent criteria. If historical data are available and no clinical utility is demonstrated for the additional consensus criteria, an acceptable out-patient review rate might be as low as 2.6%.

Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:1401–5.

Keywords: manual; outpatient; peripheral; smear review; triggering values

About the article

Corresponding author: Professor P. Froom, MD, Head of the Hematology Laboratory, Central Laboratory of Haifa and Western Galilee, Clalit Health Services, Nesher, Israel Phone: +972-4-6394470, Fax: +972-4-6243302,


Received: 2009-05-17

Accepted: 2009-07-23

Published Online: 2009-09-25

Published in Print: 2009-11-01


Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Volume 47, Issue 11, Pages 1401–1405, ISSN (Online) 1437-4331, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2009.308.

Export Citation

©2009 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Xueling Wei, Wei Li, Mengmeng Zhang, and Qingli Li
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2019, Volume 68, Number 11, Page 4481
[2]
Busadee Pratumvinit, Preechaya Wongkrajang, Kanit Reesukumal, Cherdsak Klinbua, and Patama Niamjoy
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 2013, Volume 137, Number 3, Page 408
[3]
David Barth and David Good
International Journal of Laboratory Hematology, 2018
[4]
S. Pipitone, L. Germagnoli, G. Da Rin, A. Di Fabio, A. Fanelli, F. Fiorini, S. Francione, A. Marini, A. Papa, A. Benegiamo, T. Lari, F. Siviero, M. Lorubbio, M. Borin, M. Seghezzi, M. L. Ciardelli, F. Dima, M. Gioia, and S. Buoro
International Journal of Laboratory Hematology, 2017
[5]
Qian Wang, Jianbiao Wang, Mei Zhou, Qingli Li, and Yiting Wang
Biomedical Optics Express, 2017, Volume 8, Number 6, Page 3017
[6]
Sabrina Buoro, Tommaso Mecca, Michela Seghezzi, Barbara Manenti, Giovanna Azzarà, Cosimo Ottomano, and Giuseppe Lippi
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, 2017, Volume 31, Number 4, Page e22067
[7]
Olga Ciepiela, Iwona Kotuła, Szymon Kierat, Sandra Sieczkowska, Anna Podsiadłowska, Anna Jenczelewska, Karolina Księżarczyk, and Urszula Demkow
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, 2016, Volume 30, Number 6, Page 1128
[8]
Samuel Ricardo Comar, Mariester Malvezzi, and Ricardo Pasquini
Revista Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia, 2015, Volume 37, Number 1, Page 69
[9]
E. Rabizadeh, I. Pickholtz, M. Barak, E. Isakov, Y. Zimra, and P. Froom
International Journal of Laboratory Hematology, 2015, Volume 37, Number 1, Page 44
[10]
Paul Froom, Elada Isakov, and Mira Barak
Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 2014, Volume 74, Number 4, Page 366
[11]
Esther Rabizadeh, Itay Pickholtz, Mira Barak, and Paul Froom
Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2013, Volume 66, Number 8, Page 692
[12]
Diego Velasco-Rodríguez, Juan Manuel Alonso-Domínguez, Marta Jiménez-Rolando, Fernando Ataúlfo González-Fernández, Raquel Guillén, and Jesús Villarrubia Espinosa
Revista del Laboratorio Clínico, 2013, Volume 6, Number 3, Page 122
[13]
Qingli Li, Yiting Wang, Hongying Liu, Jianbiao Wang, and Fangmin Guo
Optics & Laser Technology, 2013, Volume 54, Page 225
[14]
Sue Jung Kim, Yoonjung Kim, Saeam Shin, Jaewoo Song, and Jong Rak Choi
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 2012, Volume 136, Number 11, Page 1408
[15]
Paul Froom and Mira Barak
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 2011, Volume 49, Number 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in