Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)
Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario
Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Payne, Deborah A. / Schlattmann, Peter / Tate, Jillian R.
IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 3.017
Rank 5 out of 30 in category Medical Laboratory Technology in the 2014 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.873
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.982
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 2.238
Performance of a fully automated quantitative neopterin measurement assay in a routine voluntary blood donation setting
1Central Institute of Blood Transfusion and Immunology, University Hospital, Innsbruck, Austria
2Division of Biological Chemistry, Biocenter, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Volume 48, Issue 3, Pages 373–377, ISSN (Online) 1437-4331, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2010.072, December 2009
- Published Online:
Background: Acute virus infections are indicated by increased serum neopterin concentrations. Testing of blood donations for increased neopterin was introduced in the Austrian Tyrol in 1986 and throughout Austria in 1994 to improve the safety of blood transfusions. Radioimmunoassay (RIA) was the first available test, and the 98th percentile for neopterin concentrations from 76,500 donations was defined as the cut-off threshold, excluding donations with neopterin ≥10 nmol/L. When ELISAs were introduced on fully automated test systems to measure neopterin concentrations, results were generally higher and the cut-off was adjusted up to 12 nmol/L.
Methods: In early 2006, new equipment (Hamilton Microlab Star® pipettor+Dade Behring ELISA Processor III, BEP III®) became available which monitors sample and reagent volumes for each uptake and dispense, and takes the viscosity of the fluids into account. Using this system, the performance of neopterin determinations was evaluated over 21 months and compared to earlier data.
Results: When the new apparatuses were introduced, an immediate decrease in mean neopterin concentrations and the percentage of samples with neopterin concentrations ≥10 nmol/L was observed. The 55,516 measurements performed in 2007 showed a mean value of 5.5 nmol/L. Neopterin in 680 donations (1.23%) were ≥10 nmol/L.
Conclusions: The new Hamilton diluter increased the accuracy of the neopterin test procedure. Results are now identical with those of RIA and ELISA when run in a semi-automated manner. Differences in pipetting performance of standards and samples are considered as one possible explanation for the earlier discrepancies seen with the automated apparatus.
Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:373–7.
Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.