Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Greaves, Ronda / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Payne, Deborah A. / Schlattmann, Peter

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 3.638

CiteScore 2018: 2.44

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 1.191
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.205

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 48, Issue 3


The underestimated problem of using serum magnesium measurements to exclude magnesium deficiency in adults; a health warning is needed for “normal” results

Yasmin Ismail / Abbas A. Ismail / Adel A.A. Ismail


Background: A major use of serum magnesium measurements in clinical practice is to identify patients with deficiency. However, numerous studies have shown that magnesium deficiency is common and may be present in over 10% of hospitalized patients, as well as in the general population. An important cause for under diagnosis of deficiency is that serum magnesium, the most commonly used test, can be normal despite negative body stores. This article focuses on the limitations of “normal” magnesium results and highlights the importance of lifestyle or “modus vivendi” as a pragmatic means of identifying those individuals potentially at risk for negative body magnesium stores.

Methods: Researched peer reviewed articles on magnesium published between 1990 and 2008 in MEDLINE and EMBASE, using database keywords “magnesium, deficiency, diagnosis, treatment and hypomagnesaemia”. Bibliographies of retrieved articles have been searched and followed. We have also performed a manual search of each individual issue in which most of these reports have appeared.

Results: In 183 peer reviewed studies published from 1990 to 2008, magnesium deficiency was associated with increased prevalence and risk in 11 major conditions. Similarly, in 68 studies performed over the same period, magnesium deficiency was found to predict adverse events and a decreased risk of pathology was noted when supplementation or treatment was instituted.

Conclusions: The perception that “normal” serum magnesium excludes deficiency is common among clinicians. This perception is probably enforced by the common laboratory practice of highlighting only abnormal results. A health warning is therefore warranted regarding potential misuse of “normal” serum magnesium because restoration of magnesium stores in deficient patients is simple, tolerable, inexpensive and can be clinically beneficial.

Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:323–7.

Keywords: deficiency; diagnosis; life-style; limitation; magnesium

About the article

Corresponding author: Adel A.A. Ismail, BPharm, PhD, FRCPath, Retired Consultant in Clinical Biochemistry and Chemical Endocrinology, Wakefield, West Yorkshire, UK Phone/Fax: +44-1924-254359,

Received: 2009-09-09

Accepted: 2009-11-11

Published in Print: 2010-03-01

Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Volume 48, Issue 3, Pages 323–327, ISSN (Online) 1437-4331, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2010.077.

Export Citation

©2010 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Bianca Cristina Antunes Alves Marques, Márcia Regina Simas Torres Klein, Michelle Rabello da Cunha, Samanta de Souza Mattos, Lívia de Paula Nogueira, Tainah de Paula, Flávia Miranda Corrêa, Wille Oigman, and Mario Fritsch Neves
High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention, 2019
Emily K. Tarleton, Amanda G. Kennedy, Gail L. Rose, Abigail Crocker, and Benjamin Littenberg
Nutrients, 2019, Volume 11, Number 7, Page 1475
Saša Kenig, Ana Petelin, Tamara Poklar Vatovec, Nina Mohorko, and Zala Jenko-Pražnikar
Nutrition, 2019, Volume 67-68, Page 110522
Roland Stegmann
Journal für Gynäkologische Endokrinologie/Schweiz, 2019, Volume 22, Number 2, Page 71
Jürgen Vormann and Tanja Werner
Journal für Mineralstoffwechsel & Muskuloskelettale Erkrankungen, 2019, Volume 26, Number 2, Page 38
Anna Kirkland, Gabrielle Sarlo, and Kathleen Holton
Nutrients, 2018, Volume 10, Number 6, Page 730
Maria Bullarbo, Helena Mattson, Anna-Karin Broman, Natalia Ödman, and Thorkild F. Nielsen
Journal of Pregnancy, 2018, Volume 2018, Page 1
Adel A.A. Ismail, Yasmin Ismail, and Abbas A. Ismail
Diagnosis, 2014, Volume 1, Number 4
Lynne M. Dalton, Deirdre M. Ní Fhloinn, Gergana T. Gaydadzhieva, Ola M. Mazurkiewicz, Heather Leeson, and Ciara P. Wright
Nutrition Reviews, 2016, Volume 74, Number 9, Page 549
Jui-Hua Huang, Yi-Fa Lu, Fu-Chou Cheng, John Ning-Yuean Lee, and Leih-Ching Tsai
Nutrition Journal, 2012, Volume 11, Number 1
Uwe Gröber, Joachim Schmidt, and Klaus Kisters
Nutrients, 2015, Volume 7, Number 9, Page 8199
Katie E. Osborn, R. Douglas Shytle, Alfred T. Frontera, Jason R. Soble, and Mike R. Schoenberg
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2016, Volume 56, Number 3, Page 260
Vincent Crosby, Ronald J. Elin, Robert Twycross, Mary Mihalyo, and Andrew Wilcock
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2013, Volume 45, Number 1, Page 137
Jakob Hedberg and Arvo Haenni
Obesity Surgery, 2012, Volume 22, Number 11, Page 1708
S. S. Christodoulides, E. G. Neal, G. Fitzsimmons, H. M. Chaffe, Y. M. Jeanes, H. Aitkenhead, and J. H. Cross
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 2012, Volume 25, Number 1, Page 16
Asghar Ghasemi, Leila Syedmoradi, Saleh Zahediasl, and Fereidoun Azizi
Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 2010, Volume 70, Number 6, Page 415

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in