Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Payne, Deborah A. / Schlattmann, Peter / Tate, Jillian R.

IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 3.017
Rank 5 out of 30 in category Medical Laboratory Technology in the 2014 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.873
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.982
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 2.238

249,00 € / $374.00 / £187.00*

See all formats and pricing


Select Volume and Issue


Evaluating laboratory diagnostic tests and translational research

Mario Plebani1, 2

1Department of Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy

2Leonardo Foundation, Abano Terme, Padova, Italy

Corresponding author: Mario Plebani, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova, Via Giustiniani, 2, 35128 Padova, Italy Phone: +39 049 8212792, Fax: +39 049 663240,

Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Volume 48, Issue 7, Pages 983–988, ISSN (Online) 1437-4331, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2010.188, April 2010

Publication History

Published Online:


In laboratory medicine, the evaluation of an assay is reasonably straightforward and allows broad applicable standards to be established. In contrast, the evaluation of a test is more complex and inherently less susceptible to standardization. The term “test” refers to the use of an assay in the context of a particular disease, in a particular population, and for a particular purpose. Therefore, the true evaluation is to demonstrate its effectiveness in helping a clinician achieve a correct diagnosis or improve patient clinical outcomes. The debate on the current weak framework used for evaluating laboratory tests has been stimulated by recent technological developments, in particular “omics” tests. Currently, consensus has been achieved concerning the proposal to use a model based on at least four steps to be investigated. These are analytical and clinical validity, clinical usefulness and, finally, any ethical, social and legal implications, including economic implications. As the pace of technological advancements in laboratory medicine accelerates, it is time to discuss the role of laboratory testing, and the related role of clinical laboratories. In particular, we should consider whether they should evolve as focused factories of numbers and results, or as knowledge services with an emphasis on improving appropriateness in test requesting, and the interpretation and utilization of laboratory information.

Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:983–8.

Keywords: assay; clinical outcomes; effectiveness; laboratory testing; test evaluation; translational medicine

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Matthias Orth
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 2015, Volume 53, Number 6
New England Journal of Medicine, 2011, Volume 364, Number 21, Page 2074
G. Lippi, E. J Favaloro, and M. Plebani
International Journal of Clinical Practice, 2011, Volume 65, Number 12, Page 1221
Mario Plebani and Giuseppe Lippi
Clinical Biochemistry, 2010, Volume 43, Number 12, Page 939
Mario Plebani and Giuseppe Lippi
Clinical Biochemistry, 2010, Volume 43, Number 18, Page 1484
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 2011, Volume 49, Number 10
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 2011, Volume 49, Number s1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.