Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Payne, Deborah A. / Schlattmann, Peter / Tate, Jillian R.

12 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 3.432

CiteScore 2016: 2.21

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 1.000
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.112

Online
ISSN
1437-4331
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 49, Issue 6 (Jun 2011)

Issues

Modified phosphatidylserine-dependent antithrombin ELISA enables identification of patients negative for other antiphospholipid antibodies and also detects low avidity antibodies

Polona Žigon / Aleš Ambrožič / Saša Čučnik / Tanja Kveder / Blaž Rozman / Borut Božič
  • Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Faculty of Pharmacy, Chair for Clinical Biochemistry, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2011-05-17 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2011.162

Abstract

Background: Two approaches for detecting anti-prothrombin antibodies have been described. The first detects antibodies against prothrombin alone and the second, phos-phatidylserine-dependent antiprothrombin antibodies. The latter more often correlate with clinical manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome and with lupus anticoagulant activity.

Methods: In order to increase the capacity of antibody binding, we modified the previously described phosphatidylser-ine-dependent antiprothrombin ELISA and determined their avidity. We examined 203 patients with systemic autoimmune diseases and 222 blood donors.

Results: Our modification resulted in a greater intensity of antibody binding to prothrombin on phosphatidylserine-coated plate surfaces compared to the previously described method. By changing ELISA conditions, we were able to detect with one assay the two, presumably different, populations of antiprothrombin antibodies. Diagnostic specificities of both ELISAs for antiphospholipid syndrome were similar (92.5% vs. 93.1%), while the sensitivity of the modified phosphatidylserine-dependent antiprothrombin ELISA was significantly higher than the anti-prothrombin alone ELISA (59% vs. 25%). Low avidity antiprothrombin antibodies were only detected in the modified phosphatidylserine-dependent antiprothrombin ELISA. Four percent of patients with positive phosphatidylserine-dependent antiprothrombin antibodies, showing clinical manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome, were negative for all other antiphospholipid antibodies. The risk for antiphospholipid syndrome increased with the number of antiphospholipid antibody positivity.

Conclusions: We conclude that antibodies detected with a modified phosphatidylserine-dependent antiprothrombin ELISA could improve the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome by offering additional information on the risk for thrombosis, especially in patients negative for other antiphospholipid antibodies.

Keywords: antiphospholipid antibody; antiphospholipid syndrome; antiprothrombin antibodies; enzyme immunoassay; phosphatidylserine-dependent antiprothrombin antibodies

About the article

Corresponding author: Polona Žigon, MSc, Immunology Laboratory, Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Vodnikova 62, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia Phone: +386 1 522 54 79, Fax: +386 1 519 53 38


Received: 2010-12-17

Accepted: 2011-01-10

Published Online: 2011-05-17

Published in Print: 2011-06-01


Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, ISSN (Online) 1437-4331, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2011.162.

Export Citation

©2011 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Shruti Chaturvedi and Keith R. McCrae
Current Rheumatology Reports, 2017, Volume 19, Number 7
[2]
Polona Žigon, Saša Čučnik, Aleš Ambrožič, Tanja Kveder, Snežna Sodin Šemrl, Blaž Rozman, and Borut Božič
Clinical and Developmental Immunology, 2013, Volume 2013, Page 1
[3]
Karin Malíčková, Dana Ďuricová, Martin Bortlík, Ivana Janatková, Tomáš Zima, and Milan Lukáš
Autoimmunity Highlights, 2013, Volume 4, Number 1, Page 27

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in