Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Payne, Deborah A. / Schlattmann, Peter / Tate, Jillian R.

12 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 3.432

CiteScore 2016: 2.21

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.873
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.982

Online
ISSN
1437-4331
See all formats and pricing
In This Section
Volume 49, Issue 9 (Sep 2011)

Issues

Pre-analytical effects of different lithium heparin plasma separation tubes in the routine clinical chemistry laboratory

Gunnar Brandhorst
  • Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
  • Email:
/ Jutta Engelmayer
  • Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
/ Sandra Götze
  • Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
/ Michael Oellerich
  • Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
/ Nicolas von Ahsen
  • Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
Published Online: 2011-07-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2011.606

Abstract

Background: In this study the pre-analytical effects of sample storage on frequently used routine clinical chemistry assays were evaluated by comparing four different lithium heparin plasma separation tubes to a reference collection procedure.

Methods: Blood was collected from 20 healthy volunteers using plasma separation tubes from four different manufacturers together with manually separated plasma as reference. In total, 15 clinical chemistry parameters were determined at 0 h, 24 h, and 72 h. Samples were stored at 4°C. Statistical differences were evaluated using a generalized estimating equation regression model.

Results: Significant differences could be demonstrated for almost every parameter when comparing the separation tubes to the reference collection system. The estimated maximum allowable storage time in the primary tube was considerably reduced using separation tubes, e.g., for glucose the maximum storage time was reduced from >72 h to 7–15 h, and for potassium from 60 h to 10–13 h, respectively.

Conclusions: These data indicate that sample storage in the primary tube using plasma separation tubes is associated with clinically relevant changes for certain parameters. Therefore, storing samples for retesting should be avoided when using plasma separation tubes, in particular for parameters susceptible to interference by erythrocyte or platelet contamination.

Keywords: hemolysis; interference; plasma separation tubes; pre-analytical

About the article

Corresponding author: Gunnar Brandhorst, Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Medical Center, Goettingen 37075, Germany Phone: +49-551-39-8062, Fax: +49-551-39-12771


Received: 2011-02-07

Accepted: 2011-03-30

Published Online: 2011-07-27

Published in Print: 2011-09-01



Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, ISSN (Online) 1437-4331, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2011.606. Export Citation

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in