Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Payne, Deborah A. / Schlattmann, Peter / Tate, Jillian R.

IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 3.017
Rank 5 out of 30 in category Medical Laboratory Technology in the 2014 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.873
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.982
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 2.238

See all formats and pricing


Select Volume and Issue


Detection and quantification of M-proteinemia: comparison of various methods for serum protein electrophoresis

1 / Coby Elderman-van der Werf1 / Tjallie van Abbema1

1Department of Clinical Chemistry, Klinisch Chemisch Laboratorium, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands

Corresponding author: Andries J. Bakker, PhD, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Klinisch Chemisch Laboratorium, P.O. Box 850, 8901 BR Leeuwarden, The Netherlands Phone: +31-582888444, Fax: +31-582882227

Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Volume 50, Issue 1, Pages 77–80, ISSN (Online) 1437-4331, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2011.723, September 2011

Publication History

Published Online:


Background: Detection and quantification of monoclonal proteins is hampered when the monoclonal peak coincides with one of the regular bands in serum proteinelectrophoresis. The objective of this study was to evaluate four procedures for serum proteinelectrophoresis with respect to detection and quantification of monoclonal proteins.

Methods: For 466 patient samples with a monoclonal protein, three variants of agarose gel electrophoresis (5-band, split-β and high resolution) and one variant of capillary electrophoresis were compared with the results of the routinely used agarose gel electrophoresis followed by immunofixation analysis using specific or pentavalent antisera.

Results: In total, 310 patient samples were analyzed by the four methods, consisting of 295 samples with a monoclonal protein, seven with oligoclonal bands and eight without any bands. Suspicion of a monoclonal protein was raised in 295/256/256/232/265 of the samples using the reference/5-band/split-β/high resolution/capillary procedure. In 152/147/135/142/126 of the samples the concentration of monoclonal protein was >1.0 g/L and in 51/33/53/33/67 of the cases, the monoclonal protein was not separated from one of the normal protein zones.

Conclusions: In high resolution agarose gel electrophoresis, monoclonal bands of low concentration often remain undetected. In split-β agarose gel electrophoresis as well as capillary electrophoresis monoclonal bands more often were not separated from the regular protein bands.

Keywords: agarose gel electrophoresis (AGE) variants; capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE); monoclonal gammo­pathy; M-proteinemia; serum protein electrophoresis (SPE)

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.