Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Payne, Deborah A. / Schlattmann, Peter / Tate, Jillian R.

12 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 3.432

CiteScore 2016: 2.21

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.873
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.982

Online
ISSN
1437-4331
See all formats and pricing
In This Section
Volume 50, Issue 1 (Jan 2012)

Issues

Enzyme-linked immunoassay for plasma-free metanephrines in the biochemical diagnosis of phaeochromocytoma in adults is not ideal

Fiona Mullins
  • Department of Chemical Pathology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
  • Email:
/ Paula O’Shea
  • Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
/ Roland FitzGerald
  • Department of Chemical Pathology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
/ William Tormey
  • Department of Chemical Pathology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
  • School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine, Northern Ireland
Published Online: 2011-10-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2011.742

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to define the analytical and diagnostic performance of the Labor Diagnostica Nord (LDN) 2-Met plasma ELISA assay for fractionated plasma metanephrines in the biochemical diagnosis of phaeochromocytoma.

Methods: The stated manufacturer’s performance characteristics were assessed. Clinical utility was evaluated against liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) using bias, sensitivity and specificity outcomes. Samples (n=73) were collected from patients in whom phaeochromocytoma had been excluded (n=60) based on low probability of disease, repeat negative testing for urinary fractionated catecholamines and metanephrines, lack of radiological and histological evidence of a tumour and from a group (n=13) in whom the tumour had been histologically confirmed. Blood collected into k2EDTA tubes was processed within 30 min. Separated plasma was aliquoted (×2) and frozen at –40°C prior to analyses. One aliquot was analysed for plasma metanephrines using the LDN 2-Met ELISA and the other by LC-MS/MS.

Results: The mean bias of –32% for normetanephrine (ELISA) when compared to the reference method (LC-MS/MS) makes under-diagnosis of phaeochromocytoma likely. The sensitivity of the assay (100%) was equal to the reference method, but specificity (88.3%) lower than the reference method (95%), making it less than optimum for the biochemical diagnosis of phaeochromocytoma.

Conclusions: Plasma-free metanephrines as measured by Labor Diagnostica Nord (LDN) 2-Met ELISA do not display test characteristics that would support their introduction or continuation as part of a screening protocol for the biochemical detection of phaeochromocytoma unless the calibration problem identified is corrected and other more accurate and analytically specific methods remain unavailable.

Keywords: bias; fractionated plasma metanephrines; immunoassay; mass spectrometry; phaeo­chromocytoma; sensitivity; specificity

About the article

Corresponding author: Fiona Mullins, Department of Chemical Pathology, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont Road, Dublin 9, Ireland Phone: +353 1 8092668, Fax: +353 1 8092435


Received: 2011-07-07

Accepted: 2011-09-20

Published Online: 2011-10-08

Published in Print: 2012-01-01



Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, ISSN (Online) 1437-4331, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2011.742. Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
D. Weismann, M. Peitzsch, A. Raida, A. Prejbisz, M. Gosk, A. Riester, H. S. Willenberg, R. Klemm, G. Manz, T. Deutschbein, M. Kroiss, R. Darr, M. Bidlingmaier, A. Januszewicz, G. Eisenhofer, and M. Fassnacht
European Journal of Endocrinology, 2015, Volume 172, Number 3, Page 251

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in