Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Payne, Deborah A. / Schlattmann, Peter / Tate, Jillian R.

12 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 3.432

CiteScore 2016: 2.21

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 1.000
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.112

Online
ISSN
1437-4331
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 50, Issue 3 (Mar 2012)

Issues

Canine olfactory detection of cancer versus laboratory testing: myth or opportunity?

Giuseppe Lippi / Gianfranco Cervellin
  • U.O. Pronto Soccorso e Medicina d’Urgenza, Dipartimento di Emergenza-Urgenza, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2011-07-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2011.672

Abstract

According to the most recent global cancer statistics, the burden of malignancies continues to increase worldwide, so that there is a compelling need to reinforce the screening strategies and implement novel diagnostic approaches for early detection. Canines are widely used by police forces and civilian services for detecting explosives and drugs due to their superior olfactive apparatus, which is characterized by a detection threshold as low as parts per trillion. There is mounting evidence that dogs might be effectively trained to detect patients with various form of cancers due to the presence of a characteristic “odor signature”. In particular, preliminary studies reported that appropriately trained dogs exhibit an extraordinary ability to detect melanoma as well as prostate, breast, ovary and lung cancers by recognizing a characteristic “odor signature” in body, urines, sweat, breath and even blood. The most problematic issue that has emerged so far is the large heterogeneity of performance across the different studies as well as within the same study, which might be dependent upon genetic characteristics or training methodology. This article is aimed to provide an overview of the available data on cancer sniffer dogs, highlighting the appealing perspectives and the potential drawbacks.

Keywords: cancer; dogs; olfactory detection; screening

About the article

Corresponding author: Prof. Giuseppe Lippi, U.O. Diagnostica Ematochimica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Via Gramsci, 14 43100-Parma, Italy Phone: +39-0521-703050, Fax: +39-0521-703197


Received: 2011-06-22

Accepted: 2011-06-28

Published Online: 2011-07-27

Published in Print: 2012-03-01


Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, ISSN (Online) 1437-4331, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2011.672.

Export Citation

©2012 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Concetta Panebianco, Edgar Kelman, Kristel Vene, Domenica Gioffreda, Francesca Tavano, Raivo Vilu, Fulvia Terracciano, Illar Pata, Kaarel Adamberg, Angelo Andriulli, and Valerio Pazienza
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 2017, Volume 0, Number 0
[2]
Timothy L. Edwards, Clare M. Browne, Adee Schoon, Christophe Cox, and Alan Poling
Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 2017, Volume 20, Page 59
[3]
Federica Pirrone and Mariangela Albertini
Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 2017, Volume 19, Page 105
[4]
M. Koivusalo, C. Vermeiren, J. Yuen, C. Reeve, S. Gadbois, and K. Katz
Journal of Hospital Infection, 2017, Volume 96, Number 1, Page 93
[6]
K.R. Elliker and H.C. Williams
British Journal of Dermatology, 2016, Volume 175, Number 5, Page 851
[7]
Ana Pérez Antón, Miguel del Nogal Sánchez, Ángel Pedro Crisolino Pozas, José Luis Pérez Pavón, and Bernardo Moreno Cordero
Talanta, 2016, Volume 160, Page 21
[8]
M. Yang, G.-J. Geng, W. Zhang, L. Cui, H.-X. Zhang, and J.-L. Zheng
Animal Genetics, 2016, Volume 47, Number 2, Page 240
[9]
Tadeusz Jezierski, Marta Walczak, Tomasz Ligor, Joanna Rudnicka, and Bogusław Buszewski
Journal of Breath Research, 2015, Volume 9, Number 2, Page 027001
[10]
Alan Pomerantz, Ruben Blachman-Braun, Javier Andrés Galnares-Olalde, Roberto Berebichez-Fridman, and Marino Capurso-García
Medical Hypotheses, 2015, Volume 85, Number 2, Page 160
[11]
Gianluigi Taverna, Lorenzo Tidu, Fabio Grizzi, Valter Torri, Alberto Mandressi, Paolo Sardella, Giuseppe La Torre, Giampiero Cocciolone, Mauro Seveso, Guido Giusti, Rodolfo Hurle, Armando Santoro, and Pierpaolo Graziotti
The Journal of Urology, 2015, Volume 193, Number 4, Page 1382
[12]
E. Westenbrink, R.P. Arasaradnam, N. O'Connell, C. Bailey, C. Nwokolo, K.D. Bardhan, and J.A. Covington
Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2015, Volume 67, Page 733
[13]
Hiroyuki Kataoka, Keita Saito, Hisato Kato, and Kazufumi Masuda
Bioanalysis, 2013, Volume 5, Number 11, Page 1443

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in