Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Greaves, Ronda / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Payne, Deborah A. / Schlattmann, Peter

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 3.638

CiteScore 2018: 2.44

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 1.191
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.205

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 50, Issue 6


Prenatal screening for trisomy 21: recent advances and guidelines

Jacob Canick
  • Division of Medical Screening and Special Testing, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Women and Infants Hospital, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2011-07-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2011.671


The performance of prenatal screening tests for the identification of trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) has markedly improved since the 1970s and early 1980s when maternal age was the sole mode of screening the general pregnant population. With the discovery of second trimester serum markers in the 1980s and 1990s and implementation of double, triple, and quad marker testing; the discovery of first trimester serum and ultrasound markers in the 1990s and implementation of the combined test; and the development of the integrated test and sequential screening strategies over the past decade, the performance of screening has improved to a detection rate of 90%–95% at a false positive rate of 2%–5%. In this review, I will describe the advances in prenatal screening for trisomy 21, present current screening strategies, and discuss guidelines published by professional societies and regulatory bodies, with a focus on current prenatal screening practice in the USA.

Keywords: Down syndrome; multiple markers; prenatal screening; trisomy 21

About the article

Corresponding author: Dr. Jacob Canick, Division of Medical Screening and Special Testing, 70 Elm Street, Providence, RI 02903, USA Phone: +1-401-453-7654, Fax: +1-401-276-7882

Received: 2011-04-22

Accepted: 2011-06-20

Published Online: 2011-07-27

Published in Print: 2012-06-01

Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages 1003–1008, ISSN (Online) 1437-4331, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2011.671.

Export Citation

©2012 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Zheng-You Miao, Xia Liu, Tong-Kun Shi, Ying Xu, Qin-Hao Song, and Shao-Hua Tang
Journal of Medical Screening, 2012, Volume 19, Number 2, Page 68
Lucas Hixson, Srishti Goel, Paul Schuber, Vanessa Faltas, Jessica Lee, Anjali Narayakkadan, Ho Leung, and Jim Osborne
Journal of Laboratory Automation, 2015, Volume 20, Number 5, Page 562
S Tu, M Rosenthal, D Wang, J Huang, and Y Chen
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2016, Volume 123, Page 12
J. Han, L. Zhen, M. Pan, X. Yang, Y.-M. Ou, C. Liao, and D.-Z. Li
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2015, Volume 195, Page 100
J. Han, M. Pan, L. Zhen, X. Yang, Y-M. Ou, C. Liao, and D-Z. Li
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2014, Volume 34, Number 8, Page 669
S. Brun, M.C. Leguy, A. Bruneel, T. Fournier, O. Anselem, and J. Guibourdenche
Placenta, 2014, Volume 35, Number 6, Page 425

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in