Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Greaves, Ronda / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Payne, Deborah A. / Schlattmann, Peter


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 3.638

CiteScore 2018: 2.44

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 1.191
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.205

Online
ISSN
1437-4331
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 54, Issue 2

Issues

Added value of indirect immunofluorescence intensity of automated antinuclear antibody testing in a secondary hospital setting

Matthijs Oyaert / Xavier Bossuyt
  • Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Department of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Isabelle Ravelingien / Lieve Van Hoovels
Published Online: 2015-11-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2015-0887

References

  • 1.

    Meroni PL, Schur PH. ANA screening: an old test with new recommendations. Ann Rheum 2010;69:1420–2.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 2.

    Tozzoli R, Bonaguri C, Melgari A, Antico A, Bassetti D, Bizzaro N. Current state of diagnostic technologies in the auto immunology laboratory. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:129–38.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 3.

    Krause C, Ens K, Fechner K, Voigt J, Fraune J, Rohwäder A, et al. EUROPattern Suite technology for computer-aided immunofluorescence microscopy in autoantibody diagnostics. Lupus 2015;24:516–25.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 4.

    Forslid J, Heigl Z, Jonsson J, Scheynius A. The prevalence of anti-nuclear antibodies in healthy young persons and adults, comparing rat liver tissue sections with HEp-2 as antigen substrate. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1994;12:137–41.Google Scholar

  • 5.

    Abeles AM, Abeles M. The clinical utility of a positive antinuclear antibody test result. Am J Med 2013;126:342–8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 6.

    Schouwers S, Bonnet M, Verschueren P, Westhovens R, Blockmans D, Mariên G, et al. Value-added reporting of antinuclear antibody testing by automated indirect immunofluorescence analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:547–51.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 7.

    Ramos-Casals M, Roberto-Perez-Alvarez, Diaz-lagares C, Soria N, Galiana D, Bertolaccini L, et al. Autoimmune diseases induced by biological agents: a double edged sword? Autoimmun Rev 2010;9:188–93.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 8.

    Perez-Alvarez R, Pérez-de-lis M, Ramos-Casals M. Biologics-induced auto-immune diseases. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2013;25:56–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 9.

    Vitali C, Bombardieri S, Jonsson R, Moutsopoulos HM, Alexander EL, Carsons SE. European study group on classification criteria for Sjögren’s syndrome. Classification criteria for Sjögren’s syndrome: a revised version of the European criteria proposed by the American-European consensus group. Ann Rheum Dis 2002;61:554–8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 10.

    Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1997;40:1725.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 11.

    Preliminary criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Subcommittee for scleroderma criteria of the American Rheumatism Association Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum 1980;23:581–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 12.

    Bohan A, Peter JB, Bowman RL, Pearson CM. Computer-assisted analysis of 153 patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Medicine (Baltimore) 1977;56:255–86.Google Scholar

  • 13.

    Alarcon-Segovia D, Cardiel MH. Comparison between 3 diagnostic criteria for mixed connective tissue disease. Study of 593 patients. J Rheumatol 1989;16:328–34.Google Scholar

  • 14.

    Vermeersch P, Bossuyt X. Comparative analysis of different approaches to report diagnostic accuracy. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:734–5.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Corresponding author: Lieve Van Hoovels, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital Aalst, Moorselbaan 164, 9300 Aalst, Belgium, Phone: +32 (0)53/72 42 91, Fax: +32 (0)53/72 45 88, E-mail:


Received: 2015-09-11

Accepted: 2015-10-09

Published Online: 2015-11-12

Published in Print: 2016-02-01


Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages e63–e66, ISSN (Online) 1437-4331, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2015-0887.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Jolien Claessens, Thibaut Belmondo, Ellen De Langhe, Rene Westhovens, Koen Poesen, Sophie Hüe, Daniel Blockmans, Michael Mahler, Marvin J. Fritzler, and Xavier Bossuyt
Autoimmunity Reviews, 2018

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in