Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Greaves, Ronda / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Payne, Deborah A. / Schlattmann, Peter


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 3.638

CiteScore 2018: 2.44

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 1.191
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.205

Online
ISSN
1437-4331
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 54, Issue 3

Issues

Long-term stability of glucose: 96-h study using Terumo Glycaemia tubes

Theresa Winter
  • Corresponding author
  • Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Anne Greiser
  • Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Matthias Nauck
  • Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Astrid Petersmann
  • Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-08-19 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2015-0548

Abstract

Background: Long transportation times of samples can occur due to centralization of laboratories, and also in, for instance epidemiological multicenter studies with one core laboratory. Unsatisfactory glycolysis inhibition is known to threaten the correct measurements of glucose concentration in patient samples. In former studies Terumo Glycaemia tubes proved to be superior to other anticoagulant systems for time periods of up to 24 h. We investigated long-term stability of glucose concentration in Terumo Glycaemia tubes for up to 96 h at room temperature and imitated transport conditions by continuous sample shaking.

Methods: Human venous blood samples were collected from 40 healthy blood donors using Terumo Glycaemia tubes. Immediately after sampling, tubes were mixed according to the manufactures recommendations. To simulate transportation conditions samples were placed on a shaker for the entire study period and maintained at room temperature. Samples were (re)centrifuged at 0, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 h prior to measuring glucose concentration. The glucose concentration at 0 h was used as baseline for evaluation of long-term stability.

Results: The recovery of glucose was 100% throughout the study, including the 96-h measurements. Deviations of single glucose measurements were within the imprecision of the measurement procedure.

Conclusions: Terumo Glycaemia tubes can effectively stabilize glucose in whole blood samples kept at room temperature on a shaker during a 96-h time period. Therefore, we consider Terumo Glycaemia tubes as a suitable glucose stabilizing tube for long intervals between sample collection and glucose quantification.

Keywords: glucose; glycolysis inhibition; plasma; sample transportation; stability

References

  • 1.

    Bruns DE, Knowler WC. Stabilization of glucose in blood samples: why it matters. Clin Chem 2009;55:850–2.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 2.

    Gambino R. Sodium fluoride: an ineffective inhibitor of glycolysis. Ann Clin Biochem 2013;50:3–5.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 3.

    Gambino R, Piscitelli J, Ackattupathil TA, Theriault JL, Andrin RD, Sanfilippo ML, et al. Acidification of blood is superior to sodium fluoride alone as an inhibitor of glycolysis. Clin Chem 2009;55:1019–21.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 4.

    Peake MJ, Bruns DE, Sacks DB, Horvath AR. It’s time for a better blood collection tube to improve the reliability of glucose results. Diabetes Care 2013;36:e2.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 5.

    Sacks DB, Bruns DE, Goldstein DE, Maclaren NK, McDonald JM, Parrott M. Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. Clin Chem 2002;48:436–72.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 6.

    Fobker M. Stability of glucose in plasma with different anticoagulants. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:1057–60.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 7.

    Uchida K, Matuse R, Toyoda E, Okuda S, Tomita S. A new method of inhibiting glycolysis in blood samples. Clin Chim Acta 1988;172:101–8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 8.

    Bowen RA, Remaley AT. Interferences from blood collection tube components on clinical chemistry assays. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2014;24:31–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 9.

    Turchiano M, Nguyen C, Fierman A, Lifshitz M, Convit A. Impact of blood sample collection and processing methods on glucose levels in community outreach studies. J Environ Public Health 2013;2013:256151.Google Scholar

  • 10.

    Li G, Cabanero M, Wang Z, Wang H, Huang T, Alexis H, et al. Comparison of glucose determinations on blood samples collected in three types of tubes. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2013;43:278–84.Google Scholar

  • 11.

    Stahl M, Jorgensen LG, Hyltoft Petersen P, Brandslund I, de Fine Olivarius N, Borch-Johnsen K. Optimization of preanalytical conditions and analysis of plasma glucose. 1. Impact of the new WHO and ADA recommendations on diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2001;61:169–79.Google Scholar

  • 12.

    Revision of the “Guideline of the German Medical Association on Quality Assurance in Medical Laboratory Examinations – Rili-BAEK”. J Lab Med 2015;39:26–69.Google Scholar

  • 13.

    Institute CaLS. Expression of measurement uncertainty in laboratory medicine; approved guideline. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), 2012.Google Scholar

  • 14.

    van den Berg SA, Thelen MH, Salden LP, van Thiel SW, Boonen KJ. It takes acid, rather than ice, to freeze glucose. Sci Rep 2015;5:8875.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Corresponding author: Dr. rer. nat. Theresa Winter, Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Str., 17475 Greifswald, Germany, Phone: +49 3834 865541, Fax: +49 3834 865502, E-mail:


Received: 2015-06-11

Accepted: 2015-07-22

Published Online: 2015-08-19

Published in Print: 2016-03-01


Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), Volume 54, Issue 3, Pages 407–410, ISSN (Online) 1437-4331, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2015-0548.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Helmut Kleinwechter
Info Diabetologie, 2018, Volume 12, Number 6, Page 24
[2]
Graziella Bonetti, Mariarosa Carta, Annunziata Lapolla, Roberto Miccoli, Roberto Testa, and Andrea Mosca
La Rivista Italiana della Medicina di Laboratorio - Italian Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 2018
[3]
Theresa Winter, Anke Hannemann, Juliane Suchsland, Matthias Nauck, and Astrid Petersmann
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 2018, Volume 0, Number 0
[5]
Vincenzo Roccaforte, Massimo Daves, Stefan Platzgummer, and Giuseppe Lippi
Clinical Biochemistry, 2016, Volume 49, Number 18, Page 1412
[6]
Rebekah Carey, Helen Lunt, Helen F. Heenan, Christopher M.A. Frampton, and Christopher M. Florkowski
Clinical Biochemistry, 2016, Volume 49, Number 18, Page 1406

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in