1.
Hallworth MJ. The ‘70% claim’: what is the evidence base? Ann Clin Biochem 2011;48:487–8.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
2.
Bonini P, Plebani M, Ceriotti F, Rubboli F. Errors in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem 2002;48:691–8.Google Scholar
3.
Kroll MH, Elin RJ. Interference with clinical laboratory analyses. Clin Chem 1994;40:1996–2005.Google Scholar
4.
Agarwal S, Vargas G, Nordsrtom C, Tam E, Buffone GJ, Devaraj S. Effect of interference from hemolysis. Icterus and lipemia on routine pediatric clinical chemistry assays. Clin Chim Acta 2015;438:241–5.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
5.
Ji JZ, Meng QH. Evaluation of the interference of haemoglobin, bilirubin, and lipids on Roche Cobas 6000 assays. Clin Chim Acta 2011;412:1550–3.Google Scholar
6.
Simundic AM, Nikolac N, Vukasovic I, Vrkic N. The prevalence of preanalytical errors in Croatian ISO 15189 accredited laboratory. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:1009–14.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
7.
Simundic AM, Topic E, Nikolac N, Lippi G. Hemolysis detection and management of hemolyzed specimens. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2010;20:154–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
8.
Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Blanckaert N, Giavarina D, Green S, Kitchen S, et al. Multicenter evaluation of the hemolysis index in automated clinical chemistry systems. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:934–9.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
9.
Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Interference testing in clinical chemistry; approved guideline. CLSI EP7-A2 document. Wayne, PA: Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, 2005.Google Scholar
10.
Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia/turbidity indices as indicators of interference in clinical laboratory analysis; approved guideline. CLSI C56-A document. Wayne, PA: Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, 2012.Google Scholar
11.
Čvorišćec D. [Hemoliza]. Available from: http://www.hkmb.hr/povjerenstva/strucna-pitanja.html#11. Accessed: 10 Jun, 2015. [In Croatian].
12.
Dukić L, Simundić AM. Institutional practices and policies in acid-base testing: a self reported Croatian survey study on behalf of the Croatian society of medical biochemistry and laboratory medicine Working Group for acid-base balance. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2014;24:281–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
13.
Biljak VR, Honović L, Matica J, Knežević B, Vojak SŠ. Laboratory diagnostics of chronic kidney disease in Croatia: state of the art. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2015;25:73–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
14.
Simundic AM, Church S, Cornes MP, Grankvist K, Lippi G, Nybo M, et al. Compliance of blood sampling procedures with CLSI H3-A6 standard for the collection of diagnostic blood specimens by venipuncture and risk assessment analysis: an observational study by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) working group for the preanalytical phase (WG-PRE). Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:1321–31.Google Scholar
15.
Plebani M, Sciacovelli L, Aita A, Chiozza ML. Harmonization of pre-analytical quality indicators. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2014;24:105–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
16.
Plebani M, Astion ML, Barth JH, Chen W, de Oliveira Galoro CA, Escuer MI, et al. Harmonization of quality indicators in laboratory medicine. A preliminary consensus. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:951–8.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
17.
Simundic AM, Cornes M, Grankvist K, Lippi G, Nybo M, Kovalevskaya S, et al. Survey of national guidelines, education and training on phlebotomy in 28 European countries: an original report by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) working group for the preanalytical phase (WG-PA). Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:1585–93.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
18.
Zima T. Accreditation in clinical laboratories. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2010;20:215–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
19.
Ho B, Ho E. The most common nonconformities encountered during the assessments of medical laboratories in Hong Kong using ISO 15189 as accreditation criteria. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2012;22:247–57.Google Scholar
20.
Simundic AM, Nikolac N, Ivankovic V, Ferenec-Ruzic D, Magdic B, Kvaternik M, et al. Comparison of visual versus automated detection of lipemic, icteric and hemolyzed specimens: can we rely on a human eye? Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:1361–5.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
21.
Lippi G, Avanzini P, Campioli D, Da Rin G, Dipalo M, Aloe R, et al. Systematical assessment of serum indices does not impair efficiency of clinical chemistry testing: a multicenter testing. Clin Biochem 2013;46:1281–4.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
22.
Kocak FE, Meral A, Kocak H. Assessment of serum indices implementation on Roche Cobas 6000 analyzer. Eur J Med Sci 2014;1:43–52.Google Scholar
23.
Dolci A, Panteghini M. Harmonization of automated hemolysis index assessment and use: Is it possible? Clin Chim Acta 2014;432:38–43.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
24.
Fliser E, Jerkovic K, Vidovic T, Gorenjak M. Investigation of unusual high serum indices for lipemia in clear serum samples on siemens analysers dimension. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2012;22:352–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
25.
Fernandez P, Llopis MA, Perich C, Alsina MJ, Alvarez V, Biosca C, et al. Harmonization in hemolysis detection and prevention. A working group of the Catalonian Health Institute (ICS) experience. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:1557–68.Google Scholar
26.
Nikolac N, Simundic AM, Miksa M, Lima-Oliveira G, Salvagno GL, Caruso B, et al. Heterogeneity of manufacturers’ declarations for lipemia interference – An urgent call for standardization. Clin Chim Acta 2013;426:33–40.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
27.
Nikolac N. Lipemia: causes, interference mechanisms, detection and management. Biochem Med 2014;24:57–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
28.
Dimeski G. Interference testing. Clin Biochem Rev 2008;29(Suppl 1):S43–8.Google Scholar
29.
Sandberg S, Fraser CG, Horvath AR, Jansen R, Jones G, Oosterhuis W, et al. Defining analytical performance specifications: Consensus Statement from the 1st Strategic Conference of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:833–5.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
30.
Szoke D, Braga F, Valente C, Panteghini M. Hemoglobin, bilirubin, and lipid interference on Roche Cobas 6000 assays. Clin Chim Acta 2012;413:339–41; author reply 342–3.Google Scholar
31.
Plebani M, Sciacovelli L, Aita A, Pelloso M, Chiozza ML. Performance criteria and quality indicators for the pre-analytical phase. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:943–8.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
32.
Allen LC. Role of a quality management system in improving patient safety – laboratory aspects. Clin Biochem 2013;46:1187–93.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
33.
Lippi G, Chance JJ, Church S, Dazzi P, Fontana R, Giavarina D, et al. Preanalytical quality improvement: from dream to reality. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:1113–26.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
34.
ISO 15189:2012. Medical laboratories – Requirements for quality and competence. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 2012.Google Scholar
Comments (0)