Jansen R, Jassam N, Thomas A, Perich C, Fernandez-Calle P, Faria AP, et al. A category 1 EQA scheme for comparison of laboratory performance and method performance: an international pilot study in the framework of the Calibration 2000 project. Clin Chim Acta 2014;432:90–8.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Sandberg S, Fraser C, Horvath A, Jansen R, Jones G, Oosterhuis W, et al. Defining analytical performance specifications: consensus Statement from the 1st Strategic Conference of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:833–5.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Sciacovelli L, O’Kane M, Skaik YA, Caciagli P, Pellegrini C, Da Rin G, et al. Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: From theory to practice: Preliminary data from the IFCC Working Group Project “laboratory Errors and Patient Safety”. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:835–44.Google Scholar
Weykamp C, Franck P, Klein Gunnewiek J, de Jonge R, Kuypers A, van Loon D, et al. Harmonisation of seven common enzyme results through EQA. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:1549–55.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Drion I, Cobbaert C, Groenier KH, Weykamp C, Bilo H, Wetzels J, et al. Clinical evaluation of analytical variations in serum creatinine measurements: why laboratories should abandon Jaffe techniques. BMC Nephrol 2012;13:133.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Cobbaert C, Weykamp C, Franck P, de Jonge R, Kuypers A, Steigstra H, et al. Systematic monitoring of standardization and harmonization status with commutable EQA-samples-Five year experience from the Netherlands. Clin Chim Acta 2012;414:234–40.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Perich C, Ricós C, Alvarez V, Biosca C, Boned B, Cava F, et al. External quality assurance programs as a tool for verifying standardization of measurement procedures: pilot collaboration in Europe. Clin Chim Acta 2014;432:82–9.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Fraser C. General strategies to set quality specifications for reliability performance characteristics. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1999;59:487–90.Google Scholar
Minchinela J, Ricós C, Perich C, Fernández-Calle P, Alvarez V, Domenech M, et al. Biological variation database, and quality specifications for imprecision, bias and total error (desirable and minimum). The 2014 update http://www.westgard.com/biodatabase1.htm biodatabase-2014-update. Accessed 14 Feb 2016.
Petersen P, Jørgensen L, Brandslund I, De Fine Olivarius N, Stahl M. Consequences of bias and imprecision in measurements of glucose and Hba1c for the diagnosis and prognosis of diabetes mellitus. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 2005;240:51–60.Google Scholar
Westgard J. Advanced quality management/six SIGMA Translating Method Validation Data into Sigma Metrics. https://www.westgard.com/lesson78.htm. Accessed 14 Feb 2016.
About the article
Published Online: 2017-02-09
Published in Print: 2017-08-28
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.