ISO 15189: Medical laboratories – particular requirements for quality and competence. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2012.Google Scholar
JCGM 200:2012. International Vocabulary of Metrology – Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms (VIM 3rd edition). Available at: www.bipm.org. Accessed: Nov 2016.
Oosterhuis WP, Theodorsson E. Total error vs. measurement uncertainty: revolution or evolution? Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:235–9.Google Scholar
Sandberg S, Fraser CG, Horvath AR, Jansen R, Jones G, Oosterhuis W, et al. Defining analytical performance specifications: consensus statement from the 1st strategic conference of the European federation of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:833–5.PubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
JCGM 100:2008. Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, with minor corrections (GUM). Available at: www.bipm.org. Accessed: Sept 2016.
Matar G, Poggi B, Meley R, Bon C, Chardon L, Chikh K, et al. Uncertainty in measurement for 43 biochemistry, immunoassay, and hemostasis routine analytes evaluated by a method using only external quality assessment data. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:1725–36.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Nordic Innovation. Handbook for calculation of measurement uncertainty in environmental laboratories. NT TR 537 – Edition 3.1, 2012. Available at: www.nordtest.info. Accessed: Sept 2016.
Guide to the evaluation of measurement uncertainty for quantitative test results. Technical Committee for Quality Assurance in Testing (TCQA). EUROLAB Technical Report No. 1/2006.Google Scholar
Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical measurement. Eurachem/CITAC Guide CG 4, 3rd ed. Available at: www.eurachem.org. Accessed: Nov 2016.
ISO 13528:2015 Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparison. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2012.Google Scholar
Tran MT, Hoang K, Greaves RF. Practical application of biological variation and Sigma metrics quality models to evaluate 20 chemistry analytes on the Beckman Coulter AU680. Clin Biochem 2016;49:1259–66.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar
About the article
Published Online: 2017-02-28
Published in Print: 2017-10-26
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.