Armbruster DA, Overcash DR, Reyes J. Clinical chemistry laboratory automation in the 21st century – Amat Victoria curam (Victory loves careful preparation). Clin Biochem Rev 2014;35:143–53.Google Scholar
Fernandes CM, Worster A, Eva K, Hill S, McCallum C. Pneumatic tube delivery system for blood samples reduces turnaround times without affecting sample quality. J Emerg Nurs 2006;32:139–43.Google Scholar
Lippi G, Plebani M, Favaloro EJ. Technological advances in the hemostasis laboratory. Semin Thromb Hemost 2014;40:178–85.Google Scholar
Al-Riyami AZ, Al-Khabori M, Al-Hadhrami RM, Al-Azwani IS, Davis HM, Al-Farsi KS, et al. The pneumatic tube system does not affect complete blood count results; a validation study at a tertiary care hospital. Int J Lab Hematol 2014;36:514–20.Google Scholar
Gossez M, Poitevin-Later F, Demaret J, Jallades L, Venet F, Malcus C, et al. Effect of pneumatic tube transport on T lymphocyte subsets analysis. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 2015;88:371–4.Google Scholar
Pragay DA, Edwards L, Toppin M, Palmer RR, Chilcote ME. Evaluation of an improved pneumatic-tube system suitable for transportation of blood specimens. Clin Chem 1974;20:57–60.Google Scholar
Ellis G. An episode of increased hemolysis due to a defective pneumatic air tube delivery system. Clin Biochem 2009;42:1265–9.Google Scholar
Strubi-Vuillaume I, Carlier V, Obeuf C, Vasseur F, Maury J-C, Maboudou P, et al. Gentle blood aspiration and tube cushioning reduce pneumatic tube system interference in lactate dehydrogenase assays. Ann Clin Biochem 2016;53(Pt 2):295–7.Google Scholar
Medical laboratories – Requirements for quality and competence (ISO 15189:2012, Corrected version 2014-08-15); German version EN ISO 15189:2012.Google Scholar
Revision of the “Guideline of the German Medical Association on Quality Assurance in Medical Laboratory Examinations – Rili-BAEK” (unauthorized translation). J Lab Med 2015;39:26–69.Google Scholar
Streichert T, Otto B, Schnabel C, Nordholt G, Haddad M, Maric M, et al. Determination of hemolysis thresholds by the use of data loggers in pneumatic tube systems. Clin Chem 2011;57:1390–7.Google Scholar
Mensel B, Wenzel U, Roser M, Ludemann J, Nauck M. Considerably reduced centrifugation time without increased hemolysis: evaluation of the new BD Vacutainer SSTTMII Advance. Clin Chem 2007;53:794–5.Google Scholar
Goswami B, Singh B, Chawla R, Gupta VK, Mallika V. Turn around time (TAT) as a benchmark of laboratory performance. Indian J Clin Biochem 2010;25:376–9.Google Scholar
Wenham PR, Hanson T, Ashby JP. Interference in spectrophotometric analysis of cerebrospinal fluid by haemolysis induced by transport through a pneumatic tube system. Ann Clin Biochem 2001;38(Pt 4):371–5.Google Scholar
Kratz A, Salem RO, van Cott EM. Effects of a pneumatic tube system on routine and novel hematology and coagulation parameters in healthy volunteers. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007;131:293–6.Google Scholar
Evliyaoglu O, Toprak G, Tekin A, Basarali MK, Kilinc C, Colpan L. Effect of pneumatic tube delivery system rate and distance on hemolysis of blood specimens. J Clin Lab Anal 2012;26:66–9.Google Scholar
Hansen Rohrpost. Available at: URL:http://www.hansen-rohrpost.de/rohrmaterial/pvc-rohrpostfahrrohr/. Accessed: 20 Mar 2015.
About the article
Published Online: 2016-06-30
Published in Print: 2017-02-01
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.