Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Greaves, Ronda / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Payne, Deborah A. / Schlattmann, Peter

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 3.638

CiteScore 2018: 2.44

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 1.191
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.205

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 56, Issue 11


Analytical performance of the single well titer function of NOVA View®: good enough to omit ANA IIF titer analysis?

Lieve Van Hoovels
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Laboratory Medicine, OLV Hospital Aalst, Moorselbaan 164, 9300 Aalst, Belgium, Phone: +32 (0)53/72 42 91, Fax: +32 (0)53/72 45 88
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Sofie Schouwers / Stefanie Van den Bremt / Laura Bogaert / Nathalie Vandeputte / Martine Vercammen / Xavier Bossuyt
Published Online: 2018-05-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-0338


  • 1.

    Solomon DH, Kavanaugh AJ, Schur PH, American College of Rheumatology Ad Hoc Committee on Immunologic Testing Guidelines. Evidence-based guidelines for the use of immunologic tests: antinuclear antibody testing. Arthritis Rheumatol 2002;47:434–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 2.

    Meroni PL, Schur PH. ANA screening: an old test with new recommendations. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:1420–2.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 3.

    Agmon-Levin N, Damoiseaux J, Kallenberg C, Sack U, Witte T, Herold M, et al. International recommendations for the assessment of autoantibodies to cellular antigens referred to as anti-nuclear antibodies. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:17–23.Web of ScienceCrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 4.

    Chan EK, Damoiseaux J, de Melo Cruvinel W, Carballo OG, Conrad K, Francescantonio PL, et al. Report on the second International Consensus on ANA Pattern (ICAP) workshop in Dresden 2015. Lupus 2016;25:797–804.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 5.

    Bizzaro N, Antico A, Platzgummer S, Tonutti E, Bassetti D, Pesente F, et al. Automated antinuclear immunofluorescence antibody screening: a comparative study of six computer-aided diagnostic systems. Autoimmun Rev 2014;13:292–8.PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 6.

    Van den Bremt S, Schouwers S, Van Blerk M, Van Hoovels L. ANA IIF automation: moving towards harmonization? Results of a multicenter study. J Immunol Res 2017;2017:6038137.PubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 7.

    Schouwers S, Bonnet M, Verschueren P, Westhovens R, Blockmans D, Mariën G, et al. Value-added reporting of antinuclear antibody testing by automated indirect immunofluorescence analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:547–51.PubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 8.

    Oyaert M, Bossuyt X, Ravelingien I, Van Hoovels L. Added value of indirect immunofluorescence intensity of automated antinuclear antibody testing in a secondary hospital setting. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:e63–6.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 9.

    Bossuyt X, Cooreman S, De Baere H, Verschueren P, Westhovens R, Blockmans D, et al. Detection of antinuclear antibodies by automated indirect immunofluorescence analysis. Clin Chim Acta 2013;415:101–6.Web of SciencePubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-04-02

Accepted: 2018-04-23

Published Online: 2018-05-28

Published in Print: 2018-10-25

Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

Research funding: None declared.

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: None declared.

Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), Volume 56, Issue 11, Pages 258–261, ISSN (Online) 1437-4331, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-0338.

Export Citation

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Supplementary Article Materials

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in