Oosterhuis WP, Ulenkate HJ, Goldschmidt HM. Evaluation of lab respond, a new automated validation system for clinical laboratory test results. Clin Chem 2000;46:1811–7.Google Scholar
Duca DJ. Autovalidation in a laboratory information system. Lab Med 2012;1:21–5.Google Scholar
Guidi GC, Poli G, Bassi A, Giobelli L, Benetollo PP, Lippi G. Development and implementation of an automatic system for verification, validation and delivery of laboratory test results. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:1355–60.Web of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar
Martinez-Nieto O, Lozano-Gaitán A, Beltrán-Diaz P, Mojica-Figueroa IL, Morales-Reyes OL, Isaza-Ruget MA. Autovalidation of the automated blood cell counter (CBC) in a reference laboratory in Bogota, Colombia. J Bras Patol Med Lab 2015;51:369–75.Google Scholar
Croatian Chamber of Medical Biochemists. Recommendation for critical results reporting. Available at: http://www.hkmb.hr/dokumenti/povjerenstva/HKMB%20PPSP%208.pdf. Accessed: 30 May 2017.
Barnes PW, McFadden SL, Machin SJ, Simson E. The international consensus group for hematology review. Suggested criteria for action following automated CBC and WBC differential analysis. Lab Hematol 2005;11:83–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ricos C, Alvarez V, Cava F, Garcia-Lario JV, Hernandez A, Jimenez CV, et al. Current databases on biologic variation: pros, cons and progress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1999;59: 491–500.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Froom P, Saffuri-Elias E, Barak M. Autovalidation rates in an outpatient coagulation laboratory. Int J Lab Hem 2015;37:380–5.Google Scholar
Onelöv L, Gustafsson E, Grönlund E, Andersson H, Hellberg G, Järnberg I, et al. Autoverification of routine coagulation assays in a multi-center laboratory. Scand J Clin Lab 2016;76:500–2.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
About the article
Published Online: 2017-09-23
Published in Print: 2018-02-23
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.