McCaughey EJ, Vecellio E, Lake R, Li L, Burnett L, Chesher D, et al. Current methods of haemolysis detection and reporting as a source of risk to patient safety: a narrative review. Clin Biochem Rev 2016;37:143–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Simundic AM, Nikolac N, Ivankovic V, Ferenec-Ruzic D, Magdic B, Kvaternik M, et al. Comparison of visual versus automated detection of lipemic, icteric and hemolyzed specimens: can we rely on a human eye? Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:1361–5.Google Scholar
Lippi G, Avanzini P, Campioli D, Da Rin G, Dipalo M, Aloe R, et al. Systematical assessment of serum indices does not impair efficiency of clinical chemistry testing: a multicenter study. Clin Biochem 2013;46:1281–4.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia/turbidity indices as indicators of interference in clinical laboratory analysis; approved guideline. CLSI document C56-A. Wayne, PE, USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2012.Google Scholar
Boyd JM, Krause R, Waite G, Hui W, Yazdi E, Wilmink D, et al. Developing optimized automated rule sets for reporting hemolysis, icterus and lipemia based on a priori outcomes analysis. Clin Chim Acta 2015;450:31–8.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shin DH, Kim J, Uh Y, Lee SI, Seo DM, Kim KS, et al. Development of an integrated reporting system for verifying hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia in clinical chemistry results. Ann Lab Med 2014;34:307–12.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative measurement Methods; Approved Guideline, Second edition; EP5-A2. Wayne, PA, USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2004.Google Scholar
Nikolac N, Celap I, Filipi P, Hemar M, Kocijancic M, Miler M, et al. Croatian laboratories have a good knowledge of the proper detection and management of hemolyzed, icteric and lipemic samples. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:419–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Lippi G, Luca Salvagno G, Blanckaert N, Giavarina D, Green S, Kitchen S, et al. Multicenter evaluation of the hemolysis index in automated clinical chemistry systems. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:934–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Reference and Selected Procedures for the Quantitative Determination of Hemoglobin in Blood; Approved Standard, Third Edition. CLSI document H15A3. Wayne, PE, USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2000.Google Scholar
Fernandez P, Llopis MA, Perich C, Alsina MJ, Alvarez V, Biosca C, et al. Harmonization in hemolysis detection and prevention. A working group of the Catalonian Health Institute (ICS) experience. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:1557–68.Google Scholar
Kroll MH, McCudden CR. Endogenous interferences in clinical laboratory tests. Icteric, lipemic and turbid samples. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2013.Google Scholar
Alvarez F, Whalen K, Scott MG. Conjugated, but not unconjugated, bilirubin negatively interferes in Hitachi 747 assay of inorganic phosphorus. Clin Chem USA 1993;39:2345–6.Google Scholar
Salinas M, López-Garrigós M, Lugo J, Gutiérrez M, Flors L, Leiva-Salinas C. Diagnostic accuracy of icteric index to detect abnormal total bilirubin values. J Clin Pathol 2012;65: 928–33.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Nicolay A, Lorec AM, Gomez G, Portugal H. Icteric human samples: icterus index and method of estimating an interference-free value for 16 biochemical analyses. J Clin Lab Anal 2017. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22229. [Epub ahead of print].PubMedGoogle Scholar
Nikolac N, Simundic AM, Miksa M, Lima-Oliveira G, Salvagno GL, Caruso B, et al. Heterogeneity of manufacturers’ declarations for lipemia interference – urgent call for standardization. Clin Chim Acta 2013;426:33–40.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Grunbaum AM, Gilfix BM, Hoffman RS, Lavergne V, Morris M, Miller-Nesbitt A, et al. Review of the effect of intravenous lipid emulsion on laboratory analyses. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2016;54:92–102.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lippi G, Giavarina D, Gelati M, Salvagno GL. Reference range of hemolysis index in serum and lithium-heparin plasma measured with two analytical platforms in a population of unselected outpatients. Clin Chim Acta 2014;429:143–6.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petrova DT, Cocisiu GA, Eberle C, Rhode KH, Brandhorst G, Walson PD, et al. Can the Roche hemolysis index be used for automated determination of cell-free hemoglobin? A comparison to photometric assays. Clin Biochem 2013;46:1298–301.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
About the article
Published Online: 2018-01-09
Published in Print: 2018-04-25
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.