Agmon-Levin N, Damoiseaux J, Kallenberg C, Sack U, Witte T, Herold M, et al. International recommendations for the assessment of autoantibodies to cellular antigens referred to as anti-nuclear antibodies. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:17–23.Web of SciencePubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mahler M, Meroni PL, Bossuyt X, Fritzler MJ. Current concepts and future directions for the assessment of autoantibodies to cellular antigens referred to as anti-nuclear antibodies. J Immunol Res 2014;2014:315179.PubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Op de Beeck K, Vermeersch P, Verschueren P, Westhovens R, Mariën G, Blockmans D, et al. Detection of antinuclear antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence and by solid phase assay. Autoimmun Rev 2011;10:801–8.Web of ScienceCrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Op de Beeck K, Vermeersch P, Verschueren P, Westhovens R, Mariën G, Blockmans D, et al. Antinuclear antibody detection by automated multiplex immunoassay in untreated patients at the time of diagnosis. Autoimmun Rev 2012;12:137–43.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar
Robier C, Amouzadeh-Ghadikolai O, Stettin M, Reicht G. Comparison of the clinical utility of the Elia CTD Screen to indirect immunofluorescence on Hep-2 cells. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:1365–70.PubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Shiboski SC, Shiboski CH, Criswell L, Baer A, Challacombe S, Lanfranchi H, et al. American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for Sjögren’s syndrome: a data-driven, expert consensus approach in the Sjögren’s International Collaborative Clinical Alliance cohort. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012;64:475–87.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, Johnson SR, Baron M, Tyndall A, et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 2013;65:2737–47.PubMedWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deng X, Peters B, Ettore MW, Ashworth J, Brunelle LA, Crowson CS, et al. Utility of antinuclear antibody screening by various methods in a clinical laboratory patient cohort. J Appl Lab Med (JALM) 2016;1:36–46.Google Scholar
Parker JC, Bunn CC. Sensitivity of the Phadia EliA connective tissue disease screen for less common disease-specific autoantibodies. J Clin Pathol 2011;64:631–3.Web of ScienceCrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Hoffman IE, Peene I, Veys EM, De Keyser F. Detection of specific antinuclear reactivities in patients with negative anti-nuclear antibody immunofluorescence screening tests. Clin Chem 2002;48:2171–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Avery TY, van de Cruys M, Austen J, Stals F, Damoiseaux JG. Anti-nuclear antibodies in daily clinical practice: prevalence in primary, secondary, and tertiary care. J Immunol Res 2014;2014:401739.Web of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar
Ghillani P, André C, Toly C, Rouquette AM, Bengoufa D, Nicaise P, et al. Clinical significance of anti-Ro52 (TRIM21) antibodies non-associated with anti-SSA 60kDa antibodies: results of a multicentric study. Autoimmun Rev 2011;10: 509–13.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
About the article
Published Online: 2018-01-08
Published in Print: 2018-05-24
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: Part of the analyses (identification of specific CENP, RNA polymerase III, PM-Scl, fibrillarin, Mi-2, SSA-52, PCNA and Rib-P antibodies) were performed at Thermo Fisher, Freiburg, Germany. Xavier Bossuyt has received lecture fees from Thermo Fisher.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.