Li X, Li TQ, Andreasen N, Wiberg MK, Westman E, Wahlund LO. The association between biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid and structural changes in the brain in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J Intern Med 2014;275:418–27.PubMedWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neselius S, Brisby H, Theodorsson A, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Marcusson J. CSF-biomarkers in Olympic boxing: diagnosis and effects of repetitive head trauma. PLoS One 2012;7:e33606.Web of ScienceCrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Shahim P, Gren M, Liman V, Andreasson U, Norgren N, Tegner Y, et al. Serum neurofilament light protein predicts clinical outcome in traumatic brain injury. Sci Rep 2016;6:36791.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Ost M, Nylen K, Csajbok L, Ohrfelt AO, Tullberg M, Wikkelso C, et al. Initial CSF total tau correlates with 1-year outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury. Neurology 2006;67:1600–4.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Zemlan FP, Jauch EC, Mulchahey JJ, Gabbita SP, Rosenberg WS, Speciale SG, et al. C-tau biomarker of neuronal damage in severe brain injured patients: association with elevated intracranial pressure and clinical outcome. Brain Res 2002;947:131–9.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Franz G, Beer R, Kampfl A, Engelhardt K, Schmutzhard E, Ulmer H, et al. Amyloid beta 1-42 and tau in cerebrospinal fluid after severe traumatic brain injury. Neurology 2003;60:1457–61.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goyal A, Failla MD, Niyonkuru C, Amin K, Fabio A, Berger RP, et al. S100b as a prognostic biomarker in outcome prediction for patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2013;30:946–57.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Berger RP, Pierce MC, Wisniewski SR, Adelson PD, Clark RS, Ruppel RA, et al. Neuron-specific enolase and S100B in cerebrospinal fluid after severe traumatic brain injury in infants and children. Pediatrics 2002;109:E31.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Czeiter E, Mondello S, Kovacs N, Sandor J, Gabrielli A, Schmid K, et al. Brain injury biomarkers may improve the predictive power of the IMPACT outcome calculator. J Neurotrauma 2012;29:1770–8.Web of ScienceCrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Huang XJ, Glushakova O, Mondello S, Van K, Hayes RL, Lyeth BG. Acute temporal profiles of serum levels of UCH-L1 and GFAP and relationships to neuronal and astroglial pathology following traumatic brain injury in rats. J Neurotrauma 2015;32:1179–89.PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Raponi E, Agenes F, Delphin C, Assard N, Baudier J, Legraverend C, et al. S100B expression defines a state in which GFAP-expressing cells lose their neural stem cell potential and acquire a more mature developmental stage. Glia 2007;55:165–77.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Vos PE, Jacobs B, Andriessen TM, Lamers KJ, Borm GF, Beems T, et al. GFAP and S100B are biomarkers of traumatic brain injury: an observational cohort study. Neurology 2010;75:1786–93.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Thelin EP, Jeppsson E, Frostell A, Svensson M, Mondello S, Bellander BM, et al. Utility of neuron-specific enolase in traumatic brain injury; relations to S100B levels, outcome, and extracranial injury severity. Crit Care 2016;20:285.Web of ScienceCrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Al Nimer F, Thelin E, Nystrom H, Dring AM, Svenningsson A, Piehl F, et al. Comparative assessment of the prognostic value of biomarkers in traumatic brain injury reveals an independent role for serum levels of neurofilament light. PLoS One 2015;10:e0132177.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization. WHO International Programme on Chemical Safety Biomarkers in Risk Assessment: Validity and Validation 2001. Available at: http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc222.htm. Accessed: 26 Oct 2018.
Carulli D, Rhodes KE, Brown DJ, Bonnert TP, Pollack SJ, Oliver K, et al. Composition of perineuronal nets in the adult rat cerebellum and the cellular origin of their components. J Comp Neurol 2006;494:559–77.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhang Y, Anderson PN, Campbell G, Mohajeri H, Schachner M, Lieberman AR. Tenascin-C expression by neurons and glial cells in the rat spinal cord: changes during postnatal development and after dorsal root or sciatic nerve injury. J Neurocytol 1995;24:585–601.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Grumet M, Friedlander DR, Sakurai T. Functions of brain chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans during developments: interactions with adhesion molecules. Perspect Dev Neurobiol 1996;3:319–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Cui H, Freeman C, Jacobson GA, Small DH. Proteoglycans in the central nervous system: role in development, neural repair, and Alzheimer’s disease. IUBMB Life 2013;65:108–20.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Camand E, Morel MP, Faissner A, Sotelo C, Dusart I. Long-term changes in the molecular composition of the glial scar and progressive increase of serotoninergic fibre sprouting after hemisection of the mouse spinal cord. Eur J Neurosci 2004;20:1161–76.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Schafer R, Dehn D, Burbach GJ, Deller T. Differential regulation of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan mRNAs in the denervated rat fascia dentata after unilateral entorhinal cortex lesion. Neurosci Lett 2008;439:61–5.Web of SciencePubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beggah AT, Dours-Zimmermann MT, Barras FM, Brosius A, Zimmermann DR, Zurn AD. Lesion-induced differential expression and cell association of Neurocan, Brevican, Versican V1 and V2 in the mouse dorsal root entry zone. Neuroscience 2005;133:749–62.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Becker T, Anliker B, Becker CG, Taylor J, Schachner M, Meyer RL, et al. Tenascin-R inhibits regrowth of optic fibers in vitro and persists in the optic nerve of mice after injury. Glia 2000;29:330–46.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Jones LL, Margolis RU, Tuszynski MH. The chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans neurocan, brevican, phosphacan, and versican are differentially regulated following spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol 2003;182:399–411.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Tang X, Davies JE, Davies SJ. Changes in distribution, cell associations, and protein expression levels of NG2, neurocan, phosphacan, brevican, versican V2, and tenascin-C during acute to chronic maturation of spinal cord scar tissue. J Neurosci Res 2003;71:427–44.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Asher RA, Morgenstern DA, Fidler PS, Adcock KH, Oohira A, Braistead JE, et al. Neurocan is upregulated in injured brain and in cytokine-treated astrocytes. J Neurosci 2000;20:2427–38.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Zhao YY, Lou L, Yang KC, Wang HB, Xu Y, Lu G, et al. Correlation of tenascin-C concentrations in serum with outcome of traumatic brain injury in humans. Clin Chim Acta 2017;472:46–50.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar
Suzuki H, Kanamaru K, Shiba M, Fujimoto M, Kawakita F, Imanaka-Yoshida K, et al. Tenascin-C is a possible mediator between initial brain injury and vasospasm-related and -unrelated delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2015;120:117–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Yamaguchi Y. Brevican: a major proteoglycan in adult brain. Perspect Dev Neurobiol 1996;3:307–17.Google Scholar
Kurazono S, Okamoto M, Sakiyama J, Mori S, Nakata Y, Fukuoka J, et al. Expression of brain specific chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans, neurocan and phosphacan, in the developing and adult hippocampus of Ihara’s epileptic rats. Brain Res 2001;898:36–48.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Probstmeier R, Braunewell K, Pesheva P. Involvement of chondroitin sulfates on brain-derived tenascin-R in carbohydrate-dependent interactions with fibronectin and tenascin-C. Brain Res 2000;863:42–51.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
von Holst A, Egbers U, Prochiantz A, Faissner A. Neural stem/progenitor cells express 20 tenascin C isoforms that are differentially regulated by Pax6. J Biol Chem 2007;282:9172–81.PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Sommer JB, Gaul C, Heckmann J, Neundorfer B, Erbguth FJ. Does lumbar cerebrospinal fluid reflect ventricular cerebrospinal fluid? A prospective study in patients with external ventricular drainage. Eur Neurol 2002;47:224–32.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
About the article
Published Online: 2019-04-15
Published in Print: 2019-09-25
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: The study was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council, the European Research Council, Swedish State Support for Clinical Research, the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, the Edit Jacobson Foundation and the Torsten Söderberg Foundation and Stiftelsen för Gamla Tjänarinnor. EPT is funded by grants from the Swedish Society for Medical Research.
Employment or leadership: In case of non-competing interests, unrelated to this work, KB has served as a consultant or at advisory boards for Alzheon, CogRx, Biogen, Novartis, and Roche Diagnostics, and is a co-founder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB, a GU Venture-based platform company at the University of Gothenburg. HZ has served on scientific advisory boards for Roche Diagnostics, Samumed, CogRx and Wave and is a co-founder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB, a GU Ventures-based platform company at the University of Gothenburg.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The authors report no competing financial interests. The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.