Sciacovelli L, Aita A, Padoan A, Pelloso M, Antonelli G, Piva E, et al. Performance criteria and quality indicators for the post-analytical phase. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:1169–76.Web of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar
ISO 15189:2012. Medical laboratories-requirements for quality and competence. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 2012.Google Scholar
Zarbo RJ, Jones BA, Friedberg RC, Valenstein PN, Renner SW, Schifman RB, et al. Q-tracks: a College of American Pathologists program of continuous laboratory monitoring and longitudinal tracking. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2002;126:1036–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Sciacovelli L, O’Kane M, Skaik YA, Caciagli P, Pellegrini C, Da Rin G, et al. Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: from theory to practice. Preliminary data from the IFCC Working Group Project “Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety”. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:835–44.Google Scholar
International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine. http://184.108.40.206/MqiWeb/Page_QualityIndicators.jsf. Accessed: 15 Dec 2017.
National Health and Family Planning Commission. Notification about the publishing of quality control indicators. http://www.nhfpc.gov.cn/zhuz/index.shtml. Accessed: 10 Apr 2015.
Plebani M, Astion ML, Barth JH, Chen W, de Oliveira Galoro CA, Escuer MI, et al. Harmonization of quality indicators in laboratory medicine. A preliminary consensus. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:951–8.Web of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar
Kulkarni S, Ramesh R, Srinivasan AR, Silvia CR. Evaluation of preanalytical quality indicators by Six Sigma and Pareto’s Principle. Indian J Clin Biochem 2018;33:102–7.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Sciacovelli L, Panteghini M, Lippi G, Sumarac Z, Cadamuro J, Galoro CA, et al. Defining a roadmap for harmonizing quality indicators in Laboratory Medicine: a consensus statement on behalf of the IFCC Working Group “Laboratory Error and Patient Safety” and EFLM Task and Finish Group “Performance specifications for the extra-analytical phases”. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:1478–88.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Westgard JO. Six sigma quality, design and control. Madison, WI: Westgard QC, 2006.Google Scholar
Westgard JO. The Six Sigma calculators. https://www.westgard.com/six-sigma-calculators.htm. Accessed: 30 Jan 2018.
Sciacovelli L, Lippi G, Sumarac Z, West J, Garcia Del Pino Castro I, Furtado Vieira K, et al. Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: the status of the progress of IFCC Working Group “Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety” project. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:348–57.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Fei Y, Kang F, Wang W, Zhao H, He F, Zhong K, et al. Preliminary probe of quality indicators and quality specification in total testing process in 5753 laboratories in China. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:1337–45.PubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
CLSI. CLSI document M47-A. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2007. Principles and procedures for blood cultures; Approved guideline.Google Scholar
Self WH, Mickanin J, Grijalva CG, Grant FH, Henderson MC, Corley G, et al. Reducing blood culture contamination in community hospital emergency departments: a multicenter evaluation of a quality improvement intervention. Acad Emerg Med 2014;21:274–82.PubMedWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg S, Fraser CG, Horvath AR, Jansen R, Jones G, Oosterhuis W, et al. Defining analytical performance specifications: consensus statement from the 1st Strategic Conference of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:833–5.PubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Lippi G, Sciacovelli L, Simundic AM, Plebani M. Innovative software for recording preanalytical errors in accord with the IFCC quality indicators. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017; 55:e51–3.PubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
About the article
Published Online: 2018-07-17
Published in Print: 2018-12-19
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: The organization of national survey on 15 QIs was supported by the National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, and the data management and statistics analysis was supported by the National Center for Clinical Laboratories. There was no funding source involved in this study.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.