Vasikaran SD. Anatomy and history of an External Quality Assessment program for interpretative comments in clinical biochemistry. Clin Biochem 2015;48:467–71.PubMedWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vasikaran SD, Lai LC, Sethi S, Lopez JB, Sikaris KA. Quality of interpretative commenting on common clinical chemistry results in the Asia-Pacific region and Africa. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:963–70.PubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
International Organization for Standardization. Medical laboratories-requirements for quality and competence. International Organization for Standardization (ISO 15189:2012). Available at: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:15189:ed-3:v2:en. Accessed: 3 July 2018.
Wang F, Qi Z, Cui W. From laboratory to clinic: job responsibility of laboratory physician. Chin J Clin Lab Mgt 2016;4:73–7.Google Scholar
Lu X, Gu H. Exploration for a new model of training for laboratory physicians. Natl Med J China 2014;94:2481–4.Google Scholar
Wang P, Tai S, Shi Y, Jia L. The current situation of cultivation for laboratory physicians. Med Lab Sci Clin 2017;28:63–4.Google Scholar
Vasikaran S, Sikaris K, Kilpatrick E, French J, Badrick T, Osypiw J, et al. Assuring the quality of interpretative comments in clinical chemistry. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:1901–11.PubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
International Organization for Standardization. Conformity assessment – general requirements for proficiency testing (ISO 17043:2010). Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/29366.html. Accessed: 17 July 2018.
Challand G, Osypiw J. Interpretation in clinical biochemistry: an external quality assurance scheme. Available at: http://www.ifcc.org/ifccfiles/docs/150206200405.pdf. Accessed: 17 July 2018.
Sciacovelli L, Zardo L, Secchiero S, Zaninotto M, Plebani M. Interpretative comments and reference ranges in EQA programs as a tool for improving laboratory appropriateness and effectiveness. Clin Chim Acta 2003;333:209–19.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
UK NEQAS for Interpretative comment. http://www.ukneqasmicro.org.uk/new-participant-enquiries/interpretative-comments/interpretative-comments-information. Accessed: 17 July 2018.
Interpretative Comments Educational Programme 2011. http://www.apfcb.org/publications.html. Accessed: 17 July 2018.
Challand GS. Case for Comment, for education and for audit. Int Fed Clin Chem 1998;10:53–5.Google Scholar
Vasikaran SD, Penberthy L, Gill J, Scott S, Sikaris KA. Review of a pilot quality assessment program for interpretative commenting. Ann Clin Biochem 2002;39:261–72.Google Scholar
Sciacovelli L, Aita A, Padoan A, Pelloso M, Antonelli G, Piva E, et al. Performance criteria and quality indicators for the post-analytical phase. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:1169–76.PubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Working Group “Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety”. MQI-Support-Revision 1. Available at: http://www.ifccmqi.com/MqiWeb/resources/doc/Quality_Indicators_Support_Processes.pdf. Accessed: 3 July 2018.
Coulson C, Kelly AM. Interpretative comments scheme comes of age. ACB News 2011;576:23.Google Scholar
About the article
Published Online: 2018-10-17
Published in Print: 2019-05-27
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.