Plebani M, Sciacovelli L, Marinova M, Marcuccitti J, Chiozza ML. Quality indicators in laboratory medicine: a fundamental tool for quality and patient safety. Clin Biochem 2013;46: 1170–74.PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Kirchner MJ, Funes VA, Adzet CB, Clar MV, Escuer MI, Girona JM, et al. Quality indicators and specifications for key processes in clinical laboratories: a preliminary experience. Clin Chem Lab Med 2007;45:672–7.PubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
ISO 15189:2012. Medical laboratories – requirements for quality and competence. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 2012.Google Scholar
Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI). Development and use of quality indicators for process improvement and monitoring of laboratory quality. Approved guideline. QMS12A. Wayne, PA: CLSI, 2010.Google Scholar
Howanitz PJ, Perrotta PL, Bashleben CP, Meier FA, Ramsey GE, Massie LW, et al. Twenty-five years of accomplishments of the College of American Pathologists Q-probes program for clinical pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2014;138:1141–9.Web of SciencePubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plebani M, Astion ML, Barth JH, Chen W, de Oliveira Galoro CA, Escuer MI, et al. Harmonization of quality indicators in laboratory medicine. A preliminary consensus. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:951–8.Web of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar
Sciacovelli L, Panteghini M, Lippi G, Sumarac Z, Cadamuro J, Galoro CA, et al. Defining a roadmap for harmonizing quality indicators in Laboratory Medicine: a consensus statement on behalf of the IFCC Working Group “Laboratory Error and Patient Safety” and EFLM Task and Finish Group “Performance specifications for the extra-analytical phases”. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:1478–88.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Westgard JO. Six sigma quality, design and control. Madison, WI: Westgard QC, 2006.Google Scholar
Burnett D. A practical guide to ISO 15189 in laboratory medicine. London: Association for Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 2013.Google Scholar
National Research Council (US) Committee on A Framework for Developing a New Taxonomy of Disease. Toward precision medicine: building a knowledge network for biomedical research and a new taxonomy of disease. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US), 2011:1–8.Google Scholar
Chiu RW, Chan KC, Gao Y, Lau VY, Zheng W, Leung TY, et al. Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy by massively parallel genomic sequencing of DNA in maternal plasma. Proc Nat Acad Sci 2008;105:20458–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jennings LJ, Arcila ME, Corless C, Kamel-Reid S, Lubin IM, Pfeifer J, et al. Guidelines for Validation of next-generation sequencing-based oncology panels: a joint consensus recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology and College of American Pathologists. J Mol Diagn 2017;19:341–65.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Rossen JW, Friedrich AW, Moran-Gilad J, ESCMID Study Group for Genomic and Molecular Diagnostics (ESGMD). Practical issues in implementing whole-genome-sequencing in routine diagnostic microbiology. Clin Microbiol Infect 2018;24:355–60.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar
Treff NR, Fedick A, Tao X, Devkota B, Taylor D, Scott RT Jr. Evaluation of targeted next-generation sequencing–based preimplantation genetic diagnosis of monogenic disease. Fertil Steril 2013;99:1377–84.PubMedWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 2015;17:405–24.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar
Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI). Molecular methods for clinical genetics and oncology testing. MM01-A3. Wayne, PA: CLSI, 2012.Google Scholar
Dorschner MO, Amendola LM, Shirts BH, Kiedrowski L, Salama J, Gordon AS, et al. Refining the structure and content of clinical genomic reports. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2014;166C:85–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Chandrananda D, Thorne NP, Bahlo M. High-resolution characterization of sequence signatures due to non-random cleavage of cell-free DNA. BMC Med Genomics 2015;8:29.Web of ScienceCrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Li WH, Qiu T, Guo L, Ying JM. Major challenges related to tumor biological characteristics in accurate mutation detection of colorectal cancer by next-generation sequencing. Cancer Lett 2017;410:92–9.PubMedWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gargis AS, Kalman L, Berry MW, Bick DP, Dimmock DP, Hambuch T, et al. Assuring the quality of next-generation sequencing in clinical laboratory practice. Nat Biotechnol 2012;30:1033–6.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar
Qin BM, Chen X, Zhu JD, Pei DQ. Identification of EGFR kinase domain mutations among lung cancer patients in China: implication for targeted cancer therapy. Cell Res 2005;15:212–7.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boch C, Kollmeier J, Roth A, Stephan-Falkenau S, Misch D, Grüning W, et al. The frequency of EGFR and KRAS mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): routine screening data for central Europe from a cohort study. BMJ Open 2013;3:e002560.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar
Kallner A, McQueen M, Heuck C. The Stockholm consensus conference on quality specifications in laboratory medicine, 25–26 April 1999. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1999;59:475–6.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg S, Fraser CG, Horvath AR, Jansen R, Jones G, Oosterhuis W, et al. Defining analytical performance specifications: Consensus Statement from the 1st Strategic Conference of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:833–5.Web of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar
Lippi G, Blanckaert N, Bonini P, Green S, Kitchen S, Palicka V, et al. Haemolysis: an overview of the leading cause of unsuitable specimens in clinical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:764–72.PubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Zaninotto M, Tognon C, Venturini R, Betterle C, Plebani M. Interference in thyroid hormones with Roche immunoassays: an unfinished story. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:e269–70.Web of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar
Piva E, Pelloso M, Penello L, Plebani M. Laboratory critical values: automated notification supports effective clinical decision making. Clin Biochem 2014;47:1163–8.PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Pareja F, Marchiò C, Reis-Filho JS. Molecular diagnostics in breast cancer. Diagnostic Histopathol 2018;24:71-82.Google Scholar
About the article
Published Online: 2018-12-14
Published in Print: 2019-05-27
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: Investigation on the quality control and the study on countermeasures of continuous improvement of municipal hospitals: the Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals. The establishment and evaluation on the standardization method of point-of care HbA1c testing and on the method of HbA1c molecular typing by mass spectrometry at different level laboratories: the National Clinical Key Specialty Construction P. The establishment of reference measurement system based on ID-LC/MS for glycated albumin and research about application in diagnosis of DM: the National Natural Science Foundation of China.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.