Huddy JR, Ni MZ, Markar SR, Hanna GB. Point-of-care testing in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal cancers: current technology and future directions. World J Gastroenterol 2015;21:4111–20.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Global Point-of-Care Diagnostics Market Outlook. 2018. http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/2848147/global-point-of-care-diagnostics-market-outlook. Accessed: 24 Apr 2015.
Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:189–202.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
NIHR Medtech and In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operatives (MICs). https://www.nihr.ac.uk/about-us/how-we-are-managed/our-structure/infrastructure/Documents/medtech-and-in-vitro-diagnostic-co-operatives.htm. Accessed: 11 Sep 2018.
European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group: Test Evaluation. https://www.eflm.eu/site/page/a/1158. Accessed: 11 Sep 2018.
Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, et al. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement. Br Med J 2013;346:f1049.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
International Organization for Standardization. IEC 62366-1:2015 Medical devices – application of usability engineering to medical devices. https://www.iso.org/standard/63179.html. Accessed: 11 Sep 2018.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Diagnostics Assessment Programme manual. 2011.Google Scholar
Huddy JR, Ni M, Mavroveli S, Barlow J, Williams D-A, Hanna GB. A research protocol for developing a Point-of-Care Key Evidence Tool ‘POCKET’: a checklist for multidimensional evidence reporting on point-of-care in vitro diagnostics. BMJ Open 2015;5.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:349–57.Web of ScienceCrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9241-11. Ergonomics of human-system interaction. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-11:ed-2:v1:en. Accessed: 11 Sept 2018.
About the article
Published Online: 2018-11-09
Published in Print: 2019-05-27
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Transparency statement: The lead author affirms that this article is an honest, accurate and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned (and, if relevant, registered) have been explained.
Research funding: This research was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Diagnostic Evidence Co-operative London at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and St Mary’s Hospital, South Wharf Road, London, W2 1NY, UK.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years, no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. The funding organisation(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.