Nwachukwu BU, Hamid KS, Bozic KJ. Measuring value in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2013;1:1–9.Google Scholar
Naessens JM, Van Such MB, Nesse RE, Dilling JA, Swensen SJ, Thompson KM, et al. Looking under the streetlight? a framework for differentiating performance measures by level of care in a value-based payment environment. Acad Med 2017;92:943–50.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement. https://www.ichom.org/standard-sets/#about-standard-sets. Accessed: 19 Nov 2018. To date, ICHOM published 26 Standard Sets, covering different conditions and specific-patient populations.
D’Ambrosi R, Banfi G, Usuelli FG. Total ankle arthroplasties and national registers: what is the impact on scientific production? Foot Ankle Surg 2018 Mar 6. pii: S1268-7731(18)30046-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2018.02.016. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
Dui LG, Cabitza F, Berjano P. Minimal important difference in outcome of disc degenerative disease treatment: the patient’s perspective. Stud Health Technol Inform 2018;247:321–5.Google Scholar
Christalle E, Zeh S, Hahwleg P, Kriston L, Harter M, Scholl I. Assessment of patient centredness through patient-reporter experience measures (ASPIRES): protocol of a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open 2018;8:e025896.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Male L, Noble A, Atkinson J, Marson T. Measuring patient experience: a systematic review to evaluate psychometric properties of patient reported experience measures (PREMs) for emergency care service provision. Int J Qual Health Care 2017;29:314–26.PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Bozic KJ, Ward L. A strategy for successful implementation of bundled payments in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2014;2:e2.Google Scholar
Crawford JM, Shotorbani K, Sharma G, Crossey M, Kothari T, Lorey TS, et al. Improving american healthcare through “Clinical Lab 2.0”: A Project Santa Fe Report. Acad Pathol 2017;4:1–8.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Risin SA, Chang BN, Welsh KJ, Kidd LR, Moreno V, Chen L, et al. Exploring new ways to deliver value to healthcare organizations: algorithmic testing, data integrating, and diagnostic e-consult service. Ann Clinc Lab Sci 2015;45:239–47.Google Scholar
Brunetti M, Shemilt I, Pregno S, Vale L, Oxman AD, Lord J, et al. GRADE guidleines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66:140–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Summers SM, Long B, April MD, Koyfman A, Hunter CJ. High sensitivity troponin: the Sisyphean pursuit of zero percent miss rate for acute coronary syndrome in ED. Am J Emerg Med 2018;36:1088–97.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar
Rubinstein M, Hirsch R, Bandyopadhyay K, Madison B, Taylor T, Ranne A, et al. Effectiveness of practices to support appropriate laboratory tests utilizations: a laboratory medicine best practices systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Pathol 2018;149:197–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hudon C, Fortin M, Haggerty J, Loignon C, Lambert M, Poitras ME. Patient-centered care in chronic disease management: A thematic analysis of the literature in family medicine. Patient Educ Couns 2012;88:170–6.PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Epstein RM, Franks P, Fiscella K, Shields CG, Meldrum SC, Kravitz RL, et al. Measuring patient-centered communication in Patient-Physician consultations: theoretical and practical issues. Soc Sci Med 2005;61:1516–28.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Chaitoff A, Rothberg MB, Windover AK, Calabrese L, Misra-Hebert AD, Martinez KA. Physician empathy is not associated with laboratory outcomes in diabetes: a cross-sectional study. J Gen Intern Med 2019;34:75–81. PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Horvath AR, Lord SJ, St John A, Sandberg S, Cobbaert CM, Lorenz S, et al. Test Evaluation Working Group of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chim Acta 2014;427:49–57.Google Scholar
About the article
Published Online: 2019-02-09
Published in Print: 2019-05-27
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.